PDA

View Full Version : The upside ...(There is one belive it or not)



Argo
12-27-2009, 09:58 PM
We get to draft higher... so we are closer to Okung or Berry ... whoever is there when its our turn.

Nothing else

:lamende:

drstandley31
12-27-2009, 10:08 PM
And last year we were close to the guy we wanted, and for some reason didn't take him. No, no comfort in that.

honda522
12-27-2009, 10:44 PM
I don't want a draft pick that is higher. That means there will be a big hold out.

Stumplifter
12-28-2009, 12:34 AM
I don't want a draft pick that is higher. That means there will be a big hold out.

Quoted for truth

Argo
12-28-2009, 01:15 AM
I stand corrected.. no upside...

josh1971
12-28-2009, 01:29 AM
I stand corrected.. no upside...

Nah- maybe we'll trade a high draft pick for multiple other picks, or a Wiley veteran.

JB

yashi
12-28-2009, 01:34 AM
The upside is we were 14 point underdogs, and lost by 7 in a competitive game against the 3rd best team in the AFC in their field.

Argo
12-28-2009, 01:38 AM
The upside is we were 14 point underdogs, and lost by 7 in a competitive game against the 3rd best team in the AFC in their field.

Also true, but even as a hardcore fan of the chiefs for the las 17 years ... Im just sick of Losing. Thats all.

jason1981
12-28-2009, 01:42 AM
the other down side was the 2 int from Cassel were poor throws and poor decisions

chiefnut
12-28-2009, 10:24 AM
i am torn, on one side i have to root for us to crush the broncs no matter what... on the other if we should lose we may get the third or second pik which may be Sue. he would be a beast at NT and shore up our run D, or at least give us a run D. we don't need berrythe secondary ain't to bad when healthy...not great but not our weakest link. we need a LT so we can move Albert to guard or RT, or we need D line help so we can stop somebody's run game. otherwise we may need to shift from a 3-4 to a 9-2

Chiefster
12-28-2009, 11:26 AM
Well, in the third quarter yesterday our defense was unable to defend the pass, but they offset that by their inability to stop the run.

chiefnut
12-28-2009, 11:54 AM
i am torn, on one side i have to root for us to crush the broncs no matter what... on the other if we should lose we may get the third or second pik which may be Sue. he would be a beast at NT and shore up our run D, or at least give us a run D. we don't need berrythe secondary ain't to bad when healthy...not great but not our weakest link. we need a LT so we can move Albert to guard or RT, or we need D line help so we can stop somebody's run game. otherwise we may need to shift from a 3-4 to a 9-2

I read on one draft site that Sue was 6-5 324lbs, turns out he is only 300lbs, so in referance to my post "NEVERMIND!!"

matthewschiefs
12-28-2009, 11:55 AM
I am not one to think at least we get a higher draft pick. But that is a good thing i guess. Hopefuly they use that pick on the right player.

Connie Jo
12-28-2009, 01:41 PM
The upside is we were 14 point underdogs, and lost by 7 in a competitive game against the 3rd best team in the AFC in their field.

Ditto! :)

figcrostic
12-28-2009, 07:43 PM
And last year we were close to the guy we wanted, and for some reason didn't take him. No, no comfort in that.

I hear you and I wanted Orakpo and look whats he doing 11 sacks in his rookie year at LB.

Pro_Angler
12-29-2009, 12:22 AM
Yea I wanted Orakpo as well. I also want Sue given I am also a bias Husker fan...I honestly hope we lose and we end up with number 2 we might get a trade down for a number 1,2 and 4th round pick???

I honestly think well end up with 4th pick maybe 3rd but probably 4th pick and there isnt anything worth a 4th pick that will still be there..