PDA

View Full Version : calling bwilliams out



slc chief
06-17-2010, 07:35 PM
i know the chiefs have improved alot this offseason.you tend to differ. so lets make it interesting.if the mods approve i will bet all of my arrowhead cash. (wich is not much i have a gambling problem)that the chiefs get at the very least 6 wins this year.if i lose i will donate my arrowcash to you.when you lose you do the same. or anyone else that wants to take the bet i am open.it is a friendly wager if you want to back up your opinions let me know

honda522
06-17-2010, 07:48 PM
:bananen_smilies046: I want in.

buffman316
06-17-2010, 08:11 PM
I will put what little Arrowhead Cash I have up too on the 6 game bet. (Blackjack Addiction)

People that are always so negative about the Chiefs makes me wonder about two things. If they are so down about it why do they even care to post or follow the team? Also, are they simply Donkey fans trying to rile up people on this forum? For every one negative article you find about the Chiefs, there are 10 positive ones out there. This includes the Sporting News, who has several positive articles about the Chiefs. Kansas City Chiefs - NFL Football - Sporting News (http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/team/chiefs)

Remember this game?
Last Game
Chiefs 7 3 17 17 44
Broncos 0 10 14 0 24

I could post other stories, but the TRUE Chiefs fans know what is going on at One Arrowhead Drive.

Canada
06-17-2010, 08:14 PM
I will put what little Arrowhead Cash I have up too on the 6 game bet. (Blackjack Addiction)

People that are always so negative about the Chiefs makes me wonder about two things. If they are so down about it why do they even care to post or follow the team? Also, are they simply Donkey fans trying to rile up people on this forum? For every one negative article you find about the Chiefs, there are 10 positive ones out there. This includes the Sporting News, who has several positive articles about the Chiefs. Kansas City Chiefs - NFL Football - Sporting News (http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/team/chiefs)

Remember this game?
Last Game
Chiefs 7 3 17 17 44
Broncos 0 10 14 0 24

I could post other stories, but the TRUE Chiefs fans know what is going on at One Arrowhead Drive.
Post of the year!! :bananen_smilies046:

yashi
06-17-2010, 08:53 PM
We've seen it a million times before. If the Chiefs suck next year, he'll be back to brag about how he called it all along. If the Chiefs are good, he'll disappear never to be seen again.

matthewschiefs
06-17-2010, 09:52 PM
I will put what little Arrowhead Cash I have up too on the 6 game bet. (Blackjack Addiction)

People that are always so negative about the Chiefs makes me wonder about two things. If they are so down about it why do they even care to post or follow the team? Also, are they simply Donkey fans trying to rile up people on this forum? For every one negative article you find about the Chiefs, there are 10 positive ones out there. This includes the Sporting News, who has several positive articles about the Chiefs. Kansas City Chiefs - NFL Football - Sporting News (http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/team/chiefs)

Remember this game?
Last Game
Chiefs 7 3 17 17 44
Broncos 0 10 14 0 24

I could post other stories, but the TRUE Chiefs fans know what is going on at One Arrowhead Drive.

Yes I still am on cloud 9 from that game LOVED IT!!!!!!!!! :chiefs:

bwilliams
06-17-2010, 10:48 PM
i know the chiefs have improved alot this offseason.you tend to differ. so lets make it interesting.if the mods approve i will bet all of my arrowhead cash. (wich is not much i have a gambling problem)that the chiefs get at the very least 6 wins this year.if i lose i will donate my arrowcash to you.when you lose you do the same. or anyone else that wants to take the bet i am open.it is a friendly wager if you want to back up your opinions let me know

I could see them winning 6. They won' t win 7. And we can bet whatever you're comfortable with.

honda522
06-17-2010, 10:57 PM
We've seen it a million times before. If the Chiefs suck next year, he'll be back to brag about how he called it all along. If the Chiefs are good, he'll disappear never to be seen again.
True that.

slc chief
06-17-2010, 11:00 PM
i will bet 7 if you want to confirm it we have a deal. i think they will win exactly that 7
week 1 s.d
2 cle
7jax
8buf
9oak
12 sea
13 den
15 stl
17oak
well that is more than 7 but they will definantly get 7 out of those 9 so keep posting so i get more arrowcash lol

texaschief
06-18-2010, 01:32 AM
i know the chiefs have improved alot this offseason.you tend to differ. so lets make it interesting.if the mods approve i will bet all of my arrowhead cash. (wich is not much i have a gambling problem)that the chiefs get at the very least 6 wins this year.if i lose i will donate my arrowcash to you.when you lose you do the same. or anyone else that wants to take the bet i am open.it is a friendly wager if you want to back up your opinions let me know

6 games?!! :lol:

I bet it's lonely out there on that limb. :lol: :lol:

tornadospotter
06-18-2010, 01:54 AM
I will bet a mil arrowcash that the Chiefs will win every game they do, and bet another mill that they will lose the games they lose.



:efpge::D

tornadospotter
06-18-2010, 01:59 AM
I believe that our Chiefs will win 6 plus games this next season.
But I still think we win every game, so add a 10 to the 6 plus.

matthewschiefs
06-18-2010, 02:15 AM
I believe that our Chiefs will win 6 plus games this next season.
But I still think we win every game, so add a 10 to the 6 plus.

I say 19-0 and a superbowl :chiefs: :chiefs3:

tenacious
06-18-2010, 02:19 AM
This bwilliams character is really becoming a tired act. If you don't like the chiefs then get out of here retard.

Connie Jo
06-18-2010, 02:53 AM
We've seen it a million times before. If the Chiefs suck next year, he'll be back to brag about how he called it all along. If the Chiefs are good, he'll disappear never to be seen again.

I've no doubt he'll be back to gloat if his negative prediction of what the Chiefs 2010 season will bring is right on.

I dunno about his never to be seen again though, lol. I might have thought that a while back, but since I've noticed bwilliams does admit at times when he's wrong, or admits over exaggeration. Besides, he enjoy's arguing/debating too much, lol.

I give him credit for being entertaining! Although many find him annoying, lol...his controversial opinions and negativity make for some interesting reading, as well as humorous! :D

:efpge: :lol:

Connie Jo
06-18-2010, 02:57 AM
I will bet a mil arrowcash that the Chiefs will win every game they do, and bet another mill that they will lose the games they lose.



:efpge::D


:lol:

chief31
06-18-2010, 03:21 AM
We've seen it a million times before. If the Chiefs suck next year, he'll be back to brag about how he called it all along. If the Chiefs are good, he'll disappear never to be seen again.

I have never seen the latter. I either see one eat crow and be happy about it, or just remain grumpy, pointing out that "They didn't win a championship, did they?".

In fact, I'm not sure I have seen the prior scenario either. At least not from anyone even claiming to be a Chiefs fan.

slc chief
06-18-2010, 08:21 PM
i am not going out on a limb this is team with better coaches,better players,and a grundle of players who are actually buying in this year. and the schedule is not really hard other than ind ,ten ,and maybe houston 6 games is not far fetched but we will have to wait and see i guess

jwill 747
06-18-2010, 09:26 PM
why does bwilliams even post when its all negative.

Coach
06-18-2010, 11:21 PM
This bwilliams character is really becoming a tired act. If you don't like the chiefs then get out of here retard.

No name calling.

///////////////////////////////////////////

Regarding the bets, put your money where your mouth is. The bet thread is listed below. Remember that bets will not pay out until January 3rd, 2011.

How many games will the Kansas City Chiefs win in 2010? (http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13634)

Chiefster
06-18-2010, 11:27 PM
No name calling.

Regarding the bet, I'm going to setup a sportsbook bet, so that all of you can bet.


A man who is wise beyond his years! :D

matthewschiefs
06-18-2010, 11:50 PM
why does bwilliams even post when its all negative.


While he and I dont agree on much It does lead to good conversation during the offseason I kind of like haveing him around :lol: Keeps football talk going.

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 12:11 AM
I opened the negative thread because I think everyone's gone crazy.

For three years, we had one of the worst NFL management duos to walk the face of this earth in Herm/Carl. They traded, released, or inexplicably benched our best players (JA, Mitchell, Huard), they drafted skill, scheme, or project players over big linemen/LBs, and they ran schemes for which they didn't have the personnel. It wasn't until our team bottomed out at 2-14 that most Chiefs fans were willing to admit that these guys weren't working.

In the past two offseasons, Pioli/Haley have traded, released, or inexplicably benched our best players (TG, Pollard, DJ), drafted skill, scheme, or project players over big linemen/LBs, and are running schemes for which they don't have the personnel.

Now both groups had disadvantages coming in. Herm/Carl faced a rapidly aging roster that lacked any young talent due to years of poor drafting. Pioli/Haley face the aftermath of Herm/Carl's "youth movement." But those excuses only go so far.

A blind man can see that we have massive holes on this team. That while we're improving our glamour spots (FS, KR/PR), our best guys (Chambers, Vrabel, Waters) keep getting older and older. That we're becoming the Royals of the NFL. We let our best players go or trade them to big markets while spending as little as we can to put a team on the field.

honda522
06-19-2010, 12:31 AM
I opened the negative thread because I think everyone's gone crazy.

For three years, we had one of the worst NFL management duos to walk the face of this earth in Herm/Carl. They traded, released, or inexplicably benched our best players (JA, Mitchell, Huard), they drafted skill, scheme, or project players over big linemen/LBs, and they ran schemes for which they didn't have the personnel. It wasn't until our team bottomed out at 2-14 that most Chiefs fans were willing to admit that these guys weren't working.

In the past two offseasons, Pioli/Haley have traded, released, or inexplicably benched our best players (TG, Pollard, DJ), drafted skill, scheme, or project players over big linemen/LBs, and are running schemes for which they don't have the personnel.

Now both groups had disadvantages coming in. Herm/Carl faced a rapidly aging roster that lacked any young talent due to years of poor drafting. Pioli/Haley face the aftermath of Herm/Carl's "youth movement." But those excuses only go so far.

A blind man can see that we have massive holes on this team. That while we're improving our glamour spots (FS, KR/PR), our best guys (Chambers, Vrabel, Waters) keep getting older and older. That we're becoming the Royals of the NFL. We let our best players go or trade them to big markets while spending as little as we can to put a team on the field.
Or maybe you have gone crazy.

Since when has Pollard been amongst our best players? Or Huard? You have to be kidding me. You call your self a Chiefs fan? Sure these guys came in a did their job, but best on the team?

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 12:43 AM
Or maybe you have gone crazy.

Since when has Pollard been amongst our best players? Or Huard? You have to be kidding me. You call your self a Chiefs fan? Sure these guys came in a did their job, but best on the team?

I know its a real, real long time ago. But do you remember Herm benching a red-hot Huard right before the playoffs in 2006? Remember how that turned out?

And I know it was a real, real long time ago, but do you remember Pollard leading our team in tackles? And did you happen to see him light it up on the Texans thiws season after (stupidly) being cut?

If I can give you some helpful advice - know what you're talking about before posting. You'll look less foolish that way.

slc chief
06-19-2010, 01:02 AM
that is awesome but i still want all of my arrowcash against bwilliams arrowcash as long as he agree's and can back his mouth up

Canada
06-19-2010, 01:04 AM
No name calling.

///////////////////////////////////////////

Regarding the bets, put your money where your mouth is. The bet thread is listed below. Remember that bets will not pay out until January 3rd, 2011.

How many games will the Kansas City Chiefs win in 2010? (http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13634)

Its not name calling if its true!! Im just sayin. :bananen_smilies046:

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 01:05 AM
that is awesome but i still want all of my arrowcash against bwilliams arrowcash as long as he agree's and can back his mouth up

I agree man. Unlike you, I am a degenerate gambler. Let's bet this thing!

And did you notice that Coach put the odds of the Chiefs only winning 4-6 games at even? Everything else was 4-1, 10-1, etc. Curious stuff.

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 01:07 AM
Its not name calling if its true!! Im just sayin. :bananen_smilies046:

A Canadian mocking someone else's intelligence? Now I've seen everything!

hometeam
06-19-2010, 01:21 AM
while most of this thread does not appeal to me.

i would like to say i still think pollard is the man~

Canada
06-19-2010, 01:24 AM
A Canadian mocking someone else's intelligence? Now I've seen everything!

I was actually mocking your lack of intelligence. Now go see and naked girl and then maybe you can say you have seen everything!! :sFl_canada2::bananen_smilies046:

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 01:38 AM
I was actually mocking your lack of intelligence. Now go see and naked girl and then maybe you can say you have seen everything!! :sFl_canada2::bananen_smilies046:

Don't worry. Your mom just took care of me. That count?

Canada
06-19-2010, 02:35 AM
Don't worry. Your mom just took care of me. That count?

Figured that would be about the smartest thing you could come up with. :pointlaugh:

matthewschiefs
06-19-2010, 03:03 AM
This thread got interesting :lol:

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 12:59 PM
Figured that would be about the smartest thing you could come up with. :pointlaugh:

I wasn't trying to be that smart. Just Canadian smart.

And you should be proud. Your mom is a very sexy lady. At least with a bag over her head she is.

Coach
06-19-2010, 01:53 PM
I wasn't trying to be that smart. Just Canadian smart.

And you should be proud. Your mom is a very sexy lady. At least with a bag over her head she is.

Don't go here if you'd like to stay a part of this forum.

bwilliams
06-19-2010, 02:04 PM
Don't go here if you'd like to stay a part of this forum.

Gee, you might have a talk with the ****** whose starting stuff too.

kckidd8870
06-19-2010, 02:44 PM
I really think the Chiefs will do good things this year and after the Bolts get a beat down in week one on MNF.I think that will crush them for the year.Chiefs make playoffs and win the Division 9-7.If that D-line does its job this year and Doninates.we will have a good year.I call San Diego 8-8 ,the Faiders 7-9 and the Donks 5-11.This is the Chiefs year to shine.If the Chiefs can win four games last ,as much of a shambles as the team was in With Haley trying to run everything by himself and bringing in and out new players all year long.We added depth this year,everyone has been together for awhile now.There working hard and I think they believe now.Also with are conditioning, I think we will dominate a few people in the fourth quarter.I know it's a long shot but we owe the Colts a butt whipping,If we beat the Colts ,it will be a 10- 6 years.One last thing Chiefs fans.We need to get real loud at are home games this year.Get back to are Arrowhead Pride fans.Lets make it one of the hardest stadiums to win in again.We have to be the 12th man.Do are part to.Go Chiefs

texaschief
06-20-2010, 09:40 PM
I wasn't trying to be that smart. Just Canadian smart.

And you should be proud. Your mom is a very sexy lady. At least with a bag over her head she is.

oh... wow

this is DEFINITELY an interesting comment. :lol:

I'm proud of BWill for not just rolling over and blindly following the blind, but let's not make this personal.

That being said, BWill is the only one who has posted any football related content while the majority of the rest of y'all are doing nothing but running him into the ground with nothing to show why YOU think your opinion is better.

It doesn't take some great football mind to point out all the mistakes this staff, the last staff, and the staff before it, have made. You can't pretend you know all the mistakes Herm/CP made without being able to acknowledge crap like firing the OC 1 week before the season starts, or releasing a Pro Bowl quality Safety, or not playing your best players, or not signing/drafting at NT, etc, etc.

If you can't acknowledge these mistakes, you really should quit posting because you know NOTHING about football. PERIOD.

bwilliams
06-20-2010, 10:37 PM
It doesn't take some great football mind to point out all the mistakes this staff, the last staff, and the staff before it, have made. You can't pretend you know all the mistakes Herm/CP made without being able to acknowledge crap like firing the OC 1 week before the season starts, or releasing a Pro Bowl quality Safety, or not playing your best players, or not signing/drafting at NT, etc, etc.

If you can't acknowledge these mistakes, you really should quit posting because you know NOTHING about football. PERIOD.

Here's the thing. I'm not trying to crush anyone's dreams here. I don't think you are either. And this blind unwaivering support wouldn't bother me so much if it were based on something. Anything.

Instead, people just keep saying that we've got to have faith in Pioli because he built the Pats SB teams (which isn't true, BTW) and because he hired good coordinators (maybe true, but who knows). And you'd have to be blind not to note some missteps (hiring/firing Gailey, cutting Pollard).

I was excited as anyone about Pioli becoming GM. I understood that we'd stink in 2009. We were in the 1st year of (another) rebuilding project. I even understood (even if I didn't like) our 2009 draft. We needed big bodies on the DL and some depth at skill positions, and that was our main focus. I would have gone differently in the exact personnel (Jackson over Raji is a massive head-scratcher to this day for me), but I got it. I even understood our starting the likes of Edwards, O'Callaghan, D. Williams, Mays, etc. We didn't have another choice and there's only so much you can do in one year.

But those excuses don't extend past two years. It's completely inexcusable that we're starting the worst NT, ILBs, and RT in the NFL after two offseasons of work.

I get, in a way, what we're trying to do. Pioli/Haley drafred the highest quality players they could find in terms of work ethic and conduct. That, more than talent, was their barometer. And as much as I hated the picks, guys ike Arenas, McCluster, Lewis, Moeaki, and Sheffield are great men with great work ethics. None are going to be caught taking plays off. None are going to be caught with DWI at 3:00 am on a gameday.

But those qualities don't win you SBs. Talent wins you SBs. Now talent can't be maximized if a player is constantly distracted by off-the-field troubles or if they lack a work ethic. But all the discipline and work ethic in the world won't stop a running game if the players are too small or too slow.

Do I want us to be the Bengals or the Raiders? Of course not. But neither do I want us to be a perennial 4-12 boy scout team. There's a happy medium. Good teams find it.

Connie Jo
06-20-2010, 11:30 PM
While he and I dont agree on much It does lead to good conversation during the offseason I kind of like haveing him around :lol: Keeps football talk going.

Yep, I agree! :D


I opened the negative thread because I think everyone's gone crazy.

For three years, we had one of the worst NFL management duos to walk the face of this earth in Herm/Carl. They traded, released, or inexplicably benched our best players (JA, Mitchell, Huard), they drafted skill, scheme, or project players over big linemen/LBs, and they ran schemes for which they didn't have the personnel. It wasn't until our team bottomed out at 2-14 that most Chiefs fans were willing to admit that these guys weren't working.

In the past two offseasons, Pioli/Haley have traded, released, or inexplicably benched our best players (TG, Pollard, DJ), drafted skill, scheme, or project players over big linemen/LBs, and are running schemes for which they don't have the personnel.

Now both groups had disadvantages coming in. Herm/Carl faced a rapidly aging roster that lacked any young talent due to years of poor drafting. Pioli/Haley face the aftermath of Herm/Carl's "youth movement." But those excuses only go so far.

A blind man can see that we have massive holes on this team. That while we're improving our glamour spots (FS, KR/PR), our best guys (Chambers, Vrabel, Waters) keep getting older and older. That we're becoming the Royals of the NFL. We let our best players go or trade them to big markets while spending as little as we can to put a team on the field.

No, not crazy, hahaha. It's simply a matter of finally having legitimate reasons to be positive, and focusing more on the positive than negative. I don't believe any one here believes the Chiefs are a perfect team. We all know where the holes remain, what still needs to be improved...but for now we're simply enjoying what we've been deprived of for several years...POSITIVE CHANGES. :D


Its not name calling if its true!! Im just sayin. :bananen_smilies046:

:lol:


Here's the thing. I'm not trying to crush anyone's dreams here. I don't think you are either. And this blind unwaivering support wouldn't bother me so much if it were based on something. Anything.

Instead, people just keep saying that we've got to have faith in Pioli because he built the Pats SB teams (which isn't true, BTW) and because he hired good coordinators (maybe true, but who knows). And you'd have to be blind not to note some missteps (hiring/firing Gailey, cutting Pollard).

I was excited as anyone about Pioli becoming GM. I understood that we'd stink in 2009. We were in the 1st year of (another) rebuilding project. I even understood (even if I didn't like) our 2009 draft. We needed big bodies on the DL and some depth at skill positions, and that was our main focus. I would have gone differently in the exact personnel (Jackson over Raji is a massive head-scratcher to this day for me), but I got it. I even understood our starting the likes of Edwards, O'Callaghan, D. Williams, Mays, etc. We didn't have another choice and there's only so much you can do in one year.

But those excuses don't extend past two years. It's completely inexcusable that we're starting the worst NT, ILBs, and RT in the NFL after two offseasons of work.

I get, in a way, what we're trying to do. Pioli/Haley drafred the highest quality players they could find in terms of work ethic and conduct. That, more than talent, was their barometer. And as much as I hated the picks, guys ike Arenas, McCluster, Lewis, Moeaki, and Sheffield are great men with great work ethics. None are going to be caught taking plays off. None are going to be caught with DWI at 3:00 am on a gameday.

But those qualities don't win you SBs. Talent wins you SBs. Now talent can't be maximized if a player is constantly distracted by off-the-field troubles or if they lack a work ethic. But all the discipline and work ethic in the world won't stop a running game if the players are too small or too slow.

Do I want us to be the Bengals or the Raiders? Of course not. But neither do I want us to be a perennial 4-12 boy scout team. There's a happy medium. Good teams find it.

I do agree, that at times the Chiefs organization has taken their "boy scout" criteria to an extreme. I think that may have been more the result of CP's personality clashing with bad boy personalities, however...such as was the case with Jared Allen.

Canada
06-21-2010, 07:17 PM
Gee, you might have a talk with the ****** whose starting stuff too.
:lol:Another internet tough guy!!

http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/images/imported/2010/06/11.jpg

bwilliams
06-21-2010, 08:52 PM
:lol:Another internet tough guy!!



You think I was acting tough? Really? You're a sissy, apparently.

Look, here's the thing. I have no idea whose knob your polishing to keep posting on here, and I really don't care. You're a fat alcholic drinking himself to death in the middle of nowhere. You never have any idea what you're talking about. You rely on your apparent friendship with the mods to attack other posters. And you don't even do a very clever job of it.

It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.

Canada
06-21-2010, 09:08 PM
Figured that would be about the smartest thing you could come up with. :pointlaugh:


I wasn't trying to be that smart. Just Canadian smart.

And you should be proud. Your mom is a very sexy lady. At least with a bag over her head she is.


You think I was acting tough? Really? You're a sissy, apparently.

Look, here's the thing. I have no idea whose knob your polishing to keep posting on here, and I really don't care. You're a fat alcholic drinking himself to death in the middle of nowhere. You never have any idea what you're talking about. You rely on your apparent friendship with the mods to attack other posters. And you don't even do a very clever job of it.

It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.
:lol::lol: so thats the clever stuff you are talking about!! Great original material ya got there. I guess this is you being a tough guy then? Its cute, keep calling names princess!! :bananen_smilies046:

bwilliams
06-21-2010, 09:11 PM
:lol::lol: so thats the clever stuff you are talking about!! Great original material ya got there. I guess this is you being a tough guy then? Its cute, keep calling names princess!! :bananen_smilies046:
Me calling names? Really? That's apparently all you do on here.

And what's the point? I'd love to keep pointing out to you how completely and totally pathetic you are, but I'm not telling you anything you don't know.

tornadospotter
06-21-2010, 09:41 PM
I Think this Thread has become interesting, but I would suggest that we tone down the garbage talk. Chill out, have a cold beverage, and agree that the Chiefs are the best team to be a Fan of!
:punk::chiefs:

Canada
06-21-2010, 09:54 PM
You think I was acting tough? Really? You're a sissy, apparently.

Look, here's the thing. I have no idea whose knob your polishing to keep posting on here, and I really don't care. You're a fat alcholic drinking himself to death in the middle of nowhere. You never have any idea what you're talking about. You rely on your apparent friendship with the mods to attack other posters. And you don't even do a very clever job of it.

It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.

Is that how you make friends?

What other posters have I attacked? I made a harmless joke out of someone else calling you a retard and you got all bent outta shape. Im not attacking any posters until they start calling me an as$hole.


Me calling names? Really? That's apparently all you do on here.

And what's the point? I'd love to keep pointing out to you how completely and totally pathetic you are, but I'm not telling you anything you don't know.

I know you would love to keep talking about me. I seem to be taking up a lot of your attention!! :bananen_smilies046:

bwilliams
06-21-2010, 10:00 PM
Is that how you make friends?

What other posters have I attacked? I made a harmless joke out of someone else calling you a retard and you got all bent outta shape. Im not attacking any posters until they start calling me an as.



I know you would love to keep talking about me. I seem to be taking up a lot of your attention!! :bananen_smilies046:
No, you were being an as$hole. Which is about all you ever seem to do.

And believe me, I have no interest in being friends with the likes of you.

Canada
06-21-2010, 10:02 PM
No, you were being an as. Which is about all you ever seem to do.

And believe me, I have no interest in being friends with the likes of you.


OH NO!! We arent gonna be friends?

bwilliams
06-21-2010, 10:04 PM
OH NO!! We arent gonna be friends?

I doubt you and anyone will ever be friends. Without the aforementioned knob-sucking that is.

Canada
06-21-2010, 10:05 PM
I doubt you and anyone will ever be friends. Without the aforementioned knob-sucking that is.

I told you in your pm and I will tell you here, Im not into that like you are now stop trolling!! :bananen_smilies046:

bwilliams
06-21-2010, 10:08 PM
I told you in your pm and I will tell you here, Im not into that like you are now stop trolling!! :bananen_smilies046:
I'll tell you what, stop stalking me around these boards like the loser you are, and I'll stop bringing up your private life.

Canada
06-21-2010, 10:16 PM
Whatever gets u to stop asking me out

bwilliams
06-21-2010, 10:19 PM
Whatever gets u to stop asking me out

I've got my hands full with your mom, thanks.

hometeam
06-21-2010, 10:30 PM
My Daddy Can Beat Up Your Daddy

matthewschiefs
06-21-2010, 10:32 PM
I like this thread LOL it is never boring

SIC J
06-22-2010, 03:35 AM
I'll tell you what, stop stalking me around these boards like the loser you are, and I'll stop bringing up your private life.

Just do what I do and put him on your ignore list. You won't be the first one to do it and I won't be the last.

stricken721
06-22-2010, 06:53 PM
YouTube- I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick *** and I'm all out of bubble gum.

:sign0087:

tornadospotter
06-22-2010, 09:55 PM
YouTube- I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick *** and I'm all out of bubble gum. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImKPh6N_Lw)

:sign0087:
:sFl_canada2::chiefs::whipping1:

Chiefster
06-22-2010, 11:04 PM
Sadly another one that's run it's course!