PDA

View Full Version : Broncos lose, is the West weak this year?



tperkins73
09-23-2007, 11:58 PM
:sign0104:
I think we have a chance for the playoffs based on how the other teams in our conference are playing, especially on defense. Feels good to get that first win.

Go Chiefs!!

Coach
09-24-2007, 12:00 AM
:sign0104:
I think we have a chance for the playoffs based on how the other teams in our conference are playing, especially on defense. Feels good to get that first win.

Go Chiefs!!

Welcome to the boards. I agree the West is definitely down this year. I knew SD would struggle early. I think people overlooked all of the changes that took place there. Denver has a young QB. It's anyone's division, but SD definitely has the most talent. Although, I like the way our defense is playing.

hermhater
09-24-2007, 12:01 AM
This is the most competitive division in the league.

Some strange stuff has been happening this year in the NFL.

Coach
09-24-2007, 12:02 AM
This is the most competitive division in the league.

Some strange stuff has been happening this year in the NFL.


Historically I would agree. But this year, the talent is way down IMO.

My ranking so far this year:
AFC North - Pitt, Cincy, Balt are all playoff contenders
AFC South - Houston looks improved, Indy, Jax and Tenn can beat good teams on any given week.
AFC East - NE is the best by a long shot.
AFC West - A bunch of mediocre unbalanced teams with SD having the most talent.

timsatt1
09-24-2007, 12:02 AM
Welcome to the boards. I agree the West is definitely down this year. I knew SD would struggle early. I think people overlooked all of the changes that took place there. Denver has a young QB. It's anyone's division, but SD definitely has the most talent. Although, I like the way our defense is playing.


3 games into it, everyone has a chance. The season just started.

Whether we still have a chance after...lets say week 8...is yet to be determined.

We could be 4-4 by then....or we could be 2-6 and already out of the playoffs...only time will tell....GET HERM THE #$%#$ out of KC!! *sigh*

but, yes, good observation, the west is not exactly the powerhouse of the AFC.

tperkins73
09-24-2007, 12:04 AM
:drunkhb:
I almost enjoy Broncos losses as much as Chiefs Wins. Oakland was close to leading the west on that Kick last week. The Division is def. up for grabs.

hermhater
09-24-2007, 12:05 AM
Historically I would agree. But this year, the talent is way down IMO.


There is more talent this year in the west than ever before.

It is not being utilized correctly by the coaches.

Oakland got lucky today.

Coach
09-24-2007, 12:08 AM
:drunkhb:
I almost enjoy Broncos losses as much as Chiefs Wins. Oakland was close to leading the west on that Kick last week. The Division is def. up for grabs.

Yes it is funny to think that if Oak didn't get shafted on that FG last week, that they would be winning the division.

tperkins73
09-24-2007, 12:10 AM
I hate to be negative about the chiefs, but I am concerned about Solari's play calling. We have the talent (except at right tackle, Turley the Turd) to score 21 points + every week, but we make it easy on the defense by our play calling.

Coach
09-24-2007, 12:14 AM
I hate to be negative about the chiefs, but I am concerned about Solari's play calling. We have the talent (except at right tackle, Turley the Turd) to score 21 points + every week, but we make it easy on the defense by our play calling.

Last year's playoff Loss to the Colts was the single worst display of playcalling I have ever seen in my short 33 years.

stlchief
09-24-2007, 01:37 AM
Let's be honest:

Broncos: They were SOOOOO over-rated it was sickening. They went with the QB that finished 2-3 (and insured them of missing the play-offs last year) -- and were said to be only a hair behind SD. They squeeze out a win in week one on a last second 50 yard field goal, then almost lose to Oakland at home in OT, AND ARE STILL IN THE POWER RANKINGS in the top 10. They will be fighting Oakland for 3rd in the AFC West.

SD: They replaced one of the winningest coaches in history with a career loser. Can it be ANY surprise they start 1-2 and look like they have not team definition? Who are these guys? If LT doesn't run, Philip Rivers sucks.... These are the guys the Chiefs are fighting for a play-off spot as division champs.

There is NO reason, the Chiefs don't end next week as tied for first in the AFC West. The defense has given up less than 13 points a game, less than 300 yrds of offense, and has turn-overs & sacks in every game so far.

Denver goes to Indy. Enough said...

Chiefs end next week in SD with a 2-2 record, tied for first in the AFC West and don't look back...

DrunkHillbilly
09-24-2007, 01:39 AM
There is more talent this year in the west than ever before.

It is not being utilized correctly by the coaches.

Oakland got lucky today.

Seriously....again with the coaches??? Are they all bad coaches in the AFC West?

hermhater
09-24-2007, 01:40 AM
Let's be honest:

Broncos: They were SOOOOO over-rated it was sickening. They went with the QB that finished 2-3 (and insured them of missing the play-offs last year) -- and were said to be only a hair behind SD. They squeeze out a win in week one on a last second 50 yard field goal, then almost lose to Oakland at home in OT, AND ARE STILL IN THE POWER RANKINGS in the top 10. They will be fighting Oakland for 3rd in the AFC West.

SD: They replaced one of the winningest coaches in history with a career loser. Can it be ANY surprise they start 1-2 and look like they have not team definition? Who are these guys? If LT doesn't run, Philip Rivers sucks.... These are the guys the Chiefs are fighting for a play-off spot as division champs.

There is NO reason, the Chiefs don't end next week as tied for first in the AFC West. The defense has given up less than 13 points a game, less than 300 yrds of offense, and has turn-overs & sacks in every game so far.

Denver goes to Indy. Enough said...

Chiefs end next week in SD with a 2-2 record, tied for first in the AFC West and don't look back...


Good call man!

timsatt1
09-24-2007, 01:42 AM
Let's be honest:

Broncos: They were SOOOOO over-rated it was sickening. They went with the QB that finished 2-3 (and insured them of missing the play-offs last year) -- and were said to be only a hair behind SD. They squeeze out a win in week one on a last second 50 yard field goal, then almost lose to Oakland at home in OT, AND ARE STILL IN THE POWER RANKINGS in the top 10. They will be fighting Oakland for 3rd in the AFC West.

SD: They replaced one of the winningest coaches in history with a career loser. Can it be ANY surprise they start 1-2 and look like they have not team definition? Who are these guys? If LT doesn't run, Philip Rivers sucks.... These are the guys the Chiefs are fighting for a play-off spot as division champs.

There is NO reason, the Chiefs don't end next week as tied for first in the AFC West. The defense has given up less than 13 points a game, less than 300 yrds of offense, and has turn-overs & sacks in every game so far.

Denver goes to Indy. Enough said...

Chiefs end next week in SD with a 2-2 record, tied for first in the AFC West and don't look back...

yes, next week's game is SO SO SO HUGE....for many reasons, but the biggest reason being momentum and taking care of the mentality of the players.

The difference from being 2-2 or 1-3 is ASTOUNDING.

Next week's game could determine our fate for the rest of the season.

No, it isn't quiet a must-win like today's game WAS...but it is very important.

rbedgood
09-24-2007, 01:48 AM
yes, next week's game is SO SO SO HUGE....for many reasons, but the biggest reason being momentum and taking care of the mentality of the players.

The difference from being 2-2 or 1-3 is ASTOUNDING.

Next week's game could determine our fate for the rest of the season.

No, it isn't quiet a must-win like today's game WAS...but it is very important.

In addition to getting to .500 (2-2), it would also be a road win in the division...that is HUGE.

DrunkHillbilly
09-24-2007, 01:49 AM
In addition to getting to .500 (2-2), it would also be a road win in the division...that is HUGE.

This is most definite!!!!

Three7s
09-24-2007, 03:01 AM
All of the coaches in this division SUCK! We all know how bad Herm is. Norv Turner isn't any better, he's a loser. Shannahan has the most success of any of the coaches in this division, but hasn't done ANYTHING since Elway retired, not to mention, he went for it on 4th down and 9 and inside the 10 and missed early in the 4th quarter and still in the game......who goes for that again? Raiders look much improved, we can't look past them anymore like we used to, but I can't say I'm devastatingly worried about them either.

hermhater
09-24-2007, 03:03 AM
All of the coaches in this division SUCK! We all know how bad Herm is. Norv Turner isn't any better, he's a loser. Shannahan has the most success of any of the coaches in this division, but hasn't done ANYTHING since Elway retired, not to mention, he went for it on 4th down and 9 and inside the 10 and missed early in the 4th quarter and still in the game......who goes for that again? Raiders look much improved, we can't look past them anymore like we used to, but I can't say I'm devastatingly worried about them either.


I saw that and laughed.

If these division rivals can keep stinkin' up the place we have a great chance for the playoffs.

Let's see if HERM can call some creative plays when that happens!

m0ef0e
09-24-2007, 05:26 PM
Let's be honest:

Broncos: They were SOOOOO over-rated it was sickening. They went with the QB that finished 2-3 (and insured them of missing the play-offs last year) -- and were said to be only a hair behind SD. They squeeze out a win in week one on a last second 50 yard field goal, then almost lose to Oakland at home in OT, AND ARE STILL IN THE POWER RANKINGS in the top 10. They will be fighting Oakland for 3rd in the AFC West.

SD: They replaced one of the winningest coaches in history with a career loser. Can it be ANY surprise they start 1-2 and look like they have not team definition? Who are these guys? If LT doesn't run, Philip Rivers sucks.... These are the guys the Chiefs are fighting for a play-off spot as division champs.

There is NO reason, the Chiefs don't end next week as tied for first in the AFC West. The defense has given up less than 13 points a game, less than 300 yrds of offense, and has turn-overs & sacks in every game so far.

Denver goes to Indy. Enough said...

Chiefs end next week in SD with a 2-2 record, tied for first in the AFC West and don't look back...

:sign0098: I like how you think. I agree about the Donkeys being totally overrated and Sandy Eggo's a total mess right now. How stupid were they to get rid of Marty and Cam at the same time?!?! I'm not complaining about it though! :D The Faders have improved but not enough to win the division. GO CHIEFS!!!

Chiefster
09-25-2007, 12:59 AM
:sign0098: I like how you think. I agree about the Donkeys being totally overrated and Sandy Eggo's a total mess right now. How stupid were they to get rid of Marty and Cam at the same time?!?! I'm not complaining about it though! :D The Faders have improved but not enough to win the division. GO CHIEFS!!!

I am grateful for this fact alone! :yahoo:

m0ebr0
09-25-2007, 02:14 PM
AFC West is not the toughest division this year. No Chemestry Nuff said about SD. Donkeys scraped by 2 not so good teams and lost to a decent team at home. Faders... the are no good. As long as we can get hte play calling good we can win the division.

m0ef0e
09-25-2007, 03:29 PM
AFC West is not the toughest division this year. No Chemestry Nuff said about SD. Donkeys scraped by 2 not so good teams and lost to a decent team at home. Faders... the are no good. As long as we can get hte play calling good we can win the division.

SD has probs on offense right now and our defense is awesome. Our offense will have to continue to improve and play the best they have all year in order to win next week but it's certainly possible. The win against the Vikings will boost confidence and the fact that the players are starting to get on the coaches about the playcalling may convince them to have some faith in the players to open up the playbook some and trust the guys to make some plays and put some points up.

The Donkeys play the Ponies next week and Ponies are the prettier animals by far. Literally, and in a football sense as well this year. Denver scraped past teams that are less than impressive the first two weeks and lost to Jacksonville-- the first truly decent team they have played this year. Indianapolis is playing at a higher level than most teams in the league right now. There is a huge mountain to climb for the Donkeys to win this game.

Oakland plays Miami so who knows there. Trent and the Faders are very familiar with each other and each team is honestly less than impressive. Tough call.

All that being said, there could be 3 teams in the AFC West after next week all sitting at 2-2. Hold on to your panties, this division could get really interesting this year.

Three7s
09-25-2007, 07:09 PM
From what I've seen, the Jaguars haven't looked great either. They had a lot of trouble just beating the Falcons in their place, whom aren't very good.

Coach
09-25-2007, 07:37 PM
SD has probs on offense right now and our defense is awesome. Our offense will have to continue to improve and play the best they have all year in order to win next week but it's certainly possible. The win against the Vikings will boost confidence and the fact that the players are starting to get on the coaches about the playcalling may convince them to have some faith in the players to open up the playbook some and trust the guys to make some plays and put some points up.

The Donkeys play the Ponies next week and Ponies are the prettier animals by far. Literally, and in a football sense as well this year. Denver scraped past teams that are less than impressive the first two weeks and lost to Jacksonville-- the first truly decent team they have played this year. Indianapolis is playing at a higher level than most teams in the league right now. There is a huge mountain to climb for the Donkeys to win this game.

Oakland plays Miami so who knows there. Trent and the Faders are very familiar with each other and each team is honestly less than impressive. Tough call.

All that being said, there could be 3 teams in the AFC West after next week all sitting at 2-2. Hold on to your panties, this division could get really interesting this year.

I agree on the call about the Donks and Faders. But the Chiefs are large underdogs against the Bolts IMO. Everything will have to go right or this will be a blowout. The Chiefs simply haven't scored enough points to keep up in the games they have played this year. I know the Chiefs defense is better, but the Bolts will still score 20-25. Can the Chiefs?

hermhater
09-25-2007, 07:41 PM
I agree on the call about the Donks and Faders. But the Chiefs are large underdogs against the Bolts IMO. Everything will have to go right or this will be a blowout. The Chiefs simply haven't scored enough points to keep up in the games they have played this year. I know the Chiefs defense is better, but the Bolts will still score 20-25. Can the Chiefs?


If we get too far behind this will be the week we see the Brody/Bowe combo light up the scoreboard!

rbedgood
09-25-2007, 08:13 PM
I agree on the call about the Donks and Faders. But the Chiefs are large underdogs against the Bolts IMO. Everything will have to go right or this will be a blowout. The Chiefs simply haven't scored enough points to keep up in the games they have played this year. I know the Chiefs defense is better, but the Bolts will still score 20-25. Can the Chiefs?

I'll take the under on 22.5...I'd guess this to be a 17-14 battle as both teams have had nearly impotent offenses to this point.

Canada
09-25-2007, 08:17 PM
I agree on the call about the Donks and Faders. But the Chiefs are large underdogs against the Bolts IMO. Everything will have to go right or this will be a blowout. The Chiefs simply haven't scored enough points to keep up in the games they have played this year. I know the Chiefs defense is better, but the Bolts will still score 20-25. Can the Chiefs?

No they won't!! Our D is getting better week be week and they will be up for the task on Sunday!

Coach
09-25-2007, 08:52 PM
No they won't!! Our D is getting better week be week and they will be up for the task on Sunday!

I hope you're right. And if it were in KC, I'd agree. But I guess time will tell. I would love to see the Chiefs hold the Bolts under 10 pts. They would get some well deserved respect.

stlchief
09-25-2007, 10:35 PM
I hope you're right. And if it were in KC, I'd agree. But I guess time will tell. I would love to see the Chiefs hold the Bolts under 10 pts. They would get some well deserved respect.

Chiefs get no respect. I saw the spread was 12 in SD's favor. The Chiefs D has held opponents to under 13 and SD is averaging less than 17, so what does that mean?

It means "it's the Chiefs - they have no chance" again to the national media.

Chiefs hold the Charges to 13 or less and score 20.

Put it in the book - it's a fact.

m0ef0e
09-25-2007, 10:44 PM
wow... all good posts startin with admin... it really comes down to which offense gets it going more. both defenses are really good.

Coach
09-25-2007, 10:53 PM
Chiefs get no respect. I saw the spread was 12 in SD's favor. The Chiefs D has held opponents to under 13 and SD is averaging less than 17, so what does that mean?

It means "it's the Chiefs - they have no chance" again to the national media.

Chiefs hold the Chargers to 13 or less and score 20.

Put it in the book - it's a fact.

This sounds like a job for Chief31 in the Fantasy Sportsbook (http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/vbookie.php?). I would take your bet, but I'm not willing to bet against my team. I don't bet on any Chiefs game.

Emotional Betting = Empty Bank A/C

m0ef0e
09-25-2007, 10:56 PM
:sign0104:
I think we have a chance for the playoffs based on how the other teams in our conference are playing, especially on defense. Feels good to get that first win.

Go Chiefs!!


there it is... write it down, cuz it's true! GO CHIEFS!!!

m0ebr0
09-26-2007, 12:34 AM
Chiefs get no respect. I saw the spread was 12 in SD's favor. The Chiefs D has held opponents to under 13 and SD is averaging less than 17, so what does that mean?

It means "it's the Chiefs - they have no chance" again to the national media.

Chiefs hold the Charges to 13 or less and score 20.

Put it in the book - it's a fact.

LT has been contained this year so far. Rivers isnt looking to good. They were arguing last week on the sideline. Seems like SD could be falling apart.

The main part is to contain LT like the other teams have. If he is not a threat then we can beat them with realitive ease I think.

timsatt1
09-26-2007, 12:37 AM
if you are so mad about the spread, GO PUT REAL MONEY ON THE CHIEFS BEATING THE SPREAD.

i think 12 is a fair spread, given what the nfl fans that are not biased for the chiefs have seen the chiefs do this year.

i think it is all up hill from here for the Chiefs...but that is cause there isnt much further down you can go.

i like the chiefs defense, but they got very lucky minnesota didnt add 11 more pts....from the overthrown pass to the WIDE OPEN MAN in the end zone that the safetys failed to pick up and also the dropped pass in the end zone where the ground caused him to drop it...and they settled for a fg.

what i am saying is the 12 pt spread is fair...chiefs SHOULD actually win...if one of us chiefscrowd were coaching the offense....but the ppl making the spread is thinking about the HERM FACTOR, which is what you should be thinking about as well. the HERM FACTOR. no one has any control over the herm factor.

m0ef0e
09-26-2007, 12:40 AM
LT has been contained this year so far. Rivers isnt looking to good. They were arguing last week on the sideline. Seems like SD could be falling apart.

The main part is to contain LT like the other teams have. If he is not a threat then we can beat them with realitive ease I think.

can't take Sandy Eggo for granted tho, they have a lot of talent there. They have the potential to win and that can never be underestimated. The Chiefs also have this and are coming off a big win at home.

P.S. - I'm not changin my sig til Tony breaks the record!

m0ebr0
09-26-2007, 12:44 AM
can't take Sandy Eggo for granted tho, they have a lot of talent there. They have the potential to win and that can never be underestimated. The Chiefs also have this and are coming off a big win at home.

P.S. - I'm not changin my sig til Tony breaks the record!

Very true that u cant count out SD. Thats what I dont like about ESPN right now. They all under estimate the Chiefs by saying that we have no chance with all the talent we have on O. Plus all the talent we have on an improved D from last year.

Chiefster
09-26-2007, 01:17 AM
This sounds like a job for Chief31 in the Fantasy Sportsbook (http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/vbookie.php?). I would take your bet, but I'm not willing to bet against my team. I don't bet on any Chiefs game.

Emotional Betting = Empty Bank A/C


True words of wisdom.:11:

chief31
09-26-2007, 07:04 AM
Here is a thought... If we can go to San Diego and find a way to win, while the Colts are handing Denver their second loss and dropping them to 2-2, the AFC would look like this...

K.C. 2-2

Den. 2-2

S.D. 1-3

Oak. 1-3 (probably.)

Just a thought.

Chiefster
09-26-2007, 11:02 AM
Here is a thought... If we can go to San Diego and find a way to win, while the Colts are handing Denver their second loss and dropping them to 2-2, the AFC would look like this...

K.C. 2-2

Den. 2-2

S.D. 1-3

Oak. 1-3 (probably.)

Just a thought.

And a nice one at that.

m0ef0e
09-26-2007, 02:01 PM
Here is a thought... If we can go to San Diego and find a way to win, while the Colts are handing Denver their second loss and dropping them to 2-2, the AFC would look like this...

K.C. 2-2

Den. 2-2

S.D. 1-3

Oak. 1-3 (probably.)

Just a thought.

I like the way you think.

Three7s
09-26-2007, 04:55 PM
I think the Raiders will beat Miami, even in Miami. The Fish look really bad. As for our chances against the Bolts, it really all depends on offense. Which one will break out of the slump first? Actually let me reword that, which RB will break out of the slump first? LJ or LT? Whichever one does will win the game, guaranteed.

m0ef0e
09-26-2007, 05:04 PM
I think the Raiders will beat Miami, even in Miami. The Fish look really bad. As for our chances against the Bolts, it really all depends on offense. Which one will break out of the slump first? Actually let me reword that, which RB will break out of the slump first? LJ or LT? Whichever one does will win the game, guaranteed.

I've been thinking the same thing about the RB's but the Chiefs can't come out in this game with one-dimensional playcalling. We really need to get the lead first in this game and hold it throughout the second half with good defense and ball control.

m0ebr0
09-26-2007, 11:36 PM
I've been thinking the same thing about the RB's but the Chiefs can't come out in this game with one-dimensional playcalling. We really need to get the lead first in this game and hold it throughout the second half with good defense and ball control.

Agreed. We cant afford to go down by a TD in SD with a weapon like LT. We need to try to take the lead early so SD has to play catch up againt our D who is playing very well so far.

Coach
09-27-2007, 12:30 AM
The Chiefs have to come out and establish the pass right off hte bat, otherwise I see another long day for LJ.

anaeelbackwards
09-27-2007, 01:24 AM
Agreed. We cant afford to go down by a TD in SD with a weapon like LT. We need to try to take the lead early so SD has to play catch up againt our D who is playing very well so far.

NO early 3 and outs. thats what we need to establish!

then hopefully get the passing game started early and often!

hermhater
09-27-2007, 01:32 AM
The Chiefs have to come out and establish the pass right off hte bat, otherwise I see another long day for LJ.


If we put in Brody and started off passing they would know exactly what we are doing...

If they put in Damon they wouldn't think we were going to pass, and would block the run and then Huard would miss an open receiver...


Hmmmm... my head is spinning...

Please HERM tell me what to do????

:lol:

chief31
09-29-2007, 07:10 PM
There is one advantage that the Chiefs have in this game, that seems to have been overlooked. While the turmoils of the Chargers offense has been well noted, around the league and on this board.

However, it seems to go unnoticed that the Chargers defense has been struggling as well. They currently rank tweny-third in points allowed, twenty-second in yards allowed, twenty-second in passing yards allowed and ninth in rushing yards allowed.

If the Chiefs choose to take advantage of the Chargers' deficiencies in pass defense, as I know we are all hoping they will, then we could further expose that defense.

I think that along with Marty Schottenhiemer and Cam Cameron, the Chargers may be missing Wade Phillips just as much.

hermhater
09-29-2007, 07:15 PM
If we put in Brody and started off passing they would know exactly what we are doing...

If they put in Damon they wouldn't think we were going to p**** and would block the run and then Huard would miss an open receiver...


Hmmmm... my head is spinning...

Please HERM tell me what to do????

:lol:

Who filtered the word "pass"?

Is that a swear word?

sling58
09-30-2007, 09:29 AM
There is one advantage that the Chiefs have in this game, that seems to have been overlooked. While the turmoils of the Chargers offense has been well noted, around the league and on this board.

However, it seems to go unnoticed that the Chargers defense has been struggling as well. They currently rank tweny-third in points allowed, twenty-second in yards allowed, twenty-second in passing yards allowed and ninth in rushing yards allowed.

If the Chiefs choose to take advantage of the Chargers' deficiencies in pass defense, as I know we are all hoping they will, then we could further expose that defense.

I think that along with Marty Schottenhiemer and Cam Cameron, the Chargers may be missing Wade Phillips just as much.

I hope Herm got the memo about this and lets the our Offense outshine their Defense.

tperkins73
09-30-2007, 10:39 PM
:sign0098: When Kennison returns our offense will get even better, but Bowe made their secondary look small and slow.




There is one advantage that the Chiefs have in this game, that seems to have been overlooked. While the turmoils of the Chargers offense has been well noted, around the league and on this board.

However, it seems to go unnoticed that the Chargers defense has been struggling as well. They currently rank tweny-third in points allowed, twenty-second in yards allowed, twenty-second in passing yards allowed and ninth in rushing yards allowed.

If the Chiefs choose to take advantage of the Chargers' deficiencies in pass defense, as I know we are all hoping they will, then we could further expose that defense.

I think that along with Marty Schottenhiemer and Cam Cameron, the Chargers may be missing Wade Phillips just as much.

Smed1065
09-30-2007, 10:41 PM
Sweet victory!

hermhater
09-30-2007, 10:42 PM
:sign0098: When Kennison returns our offense will get even better, but Bowe made their secondary look small and slow.

Exactly!!!!

chief31
09-30-2007, 10:43 PM
Sweet victory!


Yes sir. My crow is honey-soaked and tasting magnificent.

tperkins73
09-30-2007, 10:44 PM
Turley get injured or benched? anyone know... Terry did a little better, but I noticed tight end help on the right side for him.

McLovin
09-30-2007, 11:12 PM
turley was injured dont know the extent of it though

Chiefster
10-01-2007, 01:49 AM
Three way tie for fist place in the AFC West; when was the last time that happened?

hermhater
10-01-2007, 01:52 AM
Three way tie for fist place in the AFC West; when was the last time that happened?

We are in first place.

We have a division win!!!!!!

:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:: yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:

rbedgood
10-01-2007, 02:26 AM
We are in first place.

We have a division win!!!!!!

:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:: yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:

2-2 and first place is great, but almost more important is the 1-0 in the division.

sling58
10-01-2007, 09:07 AM
Hate to rub it in fellows but I said the Chiefs would win all along so I didn't have to eat Crow this week. lol

Canada
10-01-2007, 09:40 AM
2-2 and first place is great, but almost more important is the 1-0 in the division.

...and it was on the road!! Next time we get them in our backyard!! :yahoo:

sling58
10-01-2007, 09:41 AM
...and it was on the road!! Next time we get them in our backyard!! :yahoo:

It's hard for us to be beaten at home. I love ARROWHEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wolfpack
10-01-2007, 11:43 AM
the west so far. isnt that good this year. but the year is young still.

sling58
10-01-2007, 11:45 AM
the west so far. isnt that good this year. but the year is young still.

True I see things changing soon.

Canada
10-01-2007, 11:56 AM
the west so far. isnt that good this year. but the year is young still.

Three teams in the West suck!! Chiefs kick ***!! :bananen_smilies046:

m0ebr0
10-01-2007, 12:03 PM
The West is going to be really interesting. All 3 2-2 teams are looking atleast ok (Denver). Chiefs look great sencodn half of games. If we get get it together the first half no doubt we are the best team in the West. Suprisingly Chockeland is looking good so far as well. SD is almost out 1 more loss and I think they will be outta the race. It will be very interesting to see what happens.

The west may not be as competitive to other divisions but its vere competitive in the division thus far.

sling58
10-01-2007, 12:20 PM
Three teams in the West suck!! Chiefs kick ***!! :bananen_smilies046:

I like the way you think brother!