NickheadKCAU
03-24-2016, 03:51 AM
unless ownership as a whole (is guilty, accused of) should vote for discipline.
there needs to be a judge/jury type scenario with those whom are intimately involved.
a good example would be the chiefs docking of draft picks for maclin interference.
so if owners were to vote on reprimand (knowing full well they have done the same), they would have handed down a lighter sentence.
where as if a team/player did something out of the ordinary, 32 franchises have the ability to ban for life, so to speak.
its called democracy.
how is it that just because you are an athlete, you have to be a slave to the system.
there needs to be a judge/jury type scenario with those whom are intimately involved.
a good example would be the chiefs docking of draft picks for maclin interference.
so if owners were to vote on reprimand (knowing full well they have done the same), they would have handed down a lighter sentence.
where as if a team/player did something out of the ordinary, 32 franchises have the ability to ban for life, so to speak.
its called democracy.
how is it that just because you are an athlete, you have to be a slave to the system.