Poll: Good D or Good O?

[LAChief]

My vote is a good offense will beat a good defense and I think thats the problem with Herm. He thinks you can win with a good D and no offense. You need to score to win, period.. He just doesn't have the no how on offense.

[hermhater]

Herm lost another one for us.

This is unbelievable.

[timsatt1]

you said poll, but i dont see the poll :)

but yeah, you have to have points to win.

BUT...if we had a field goal kicker, we MIGHT have won.

if payton didnt get first down on the qb sneak, we might have won. We were in it at least. I cant #$# about any of our players, just the coaches.

[anaeelbackwards]

just as much as i love OUR TENACIOUS D this season,

i really really miss our HIGH FLYIN OFFENSE we had....

at least we saw first down conversions and TD's and dammit, i miss that...

[chief31]

That depends. What do I get on the other side of the ball?

If I get an average opposite side of the ball, then I like a great defense.

If I am going to get a good opposite side, then I want a great defense.

But, if I get a poor opposite side, or a horrible opposite side, then give me a great offense.

[hermhater]

That depends. What do I get on the other side of the ball?

If I get an average opposite side of the ball, then I like a great defense.

If I am going to get a good opposite side, then I want a great defense.

But, if I get a poor opposite side, or a horrible opposite side, then give me a great offense.

Doesn't sound like it depends to me. You took a great defense no matter what.

I agree it is better to have a great defense, but there is still no reason to hamstring your O.

[Chiefster]

Herm lost another one for us.

This is unbelievable.

Actually for Herm, this is incredibly believable.

[chief31]

That depends. What do I get on the other side of the ball?

If I get an average opposite side of the ball, then I like a great defense.

If I am going to get a good opposite side, then I want a great defense.

But, if I get a poor opposite side, or a horrible opposite side, then give me a great offense.


Doesn't sound like it depends to me. You took a great defense no matter what.

I agree it is better to have a great defense, but there is still no reason to hamstring your O.

You should have read a little bit closer. I only prefer the offense, if you are going to give me a bad opposite side of the ball.

I feel that a great offense can cover for a poor defense, better than the reverse.

[chief31]

Here we go... This should add the poll to the thread.

[hermhater]

You should have read a little bit closer. I only prefer the offense, if you are going to give me a bad opposite side of the ball.

I feel that a great offense can cover for a poor defense, better than the reverse.

My bad.

:D

[Three7s]

The Chiefs did it quite well in the mid 2000s, REALLY bad defense, but we still won games with our offense. I agree with chief31.

[Canada]

We had 5 years of good offense. We need Balance.

[hermhater]

Great offense if much more entertaining, and I love to see it.

But I think we need to have balance on both sides for ANY kind of game plan to work.

[Canada]

Great offense if much more entertaining, and I love to see it.

But I think we need to have balance on both sides for ANY kind of game plan to work.

Great D is way more entertaining. I would rather see our Defense take heads off than watch the likes of Mrs Manning throw the ball.

[hermhater]

Great D is way more entertaining. I would rather see our Defense take heads off than watch the likes of Mrs Manning throw the ball.

I hate Manning now.

But...

If he defected from the Colts and said "I will only continue playing Football in the NFL is if I can play for the Kansas City Chiefs." then I would take the guy in a heartbeat.

:D

[Canada]

I hate Manning now.

But...

If he defected from the Colts and said "I will only continue playing Football in the NFL is if I can play for the Kansas City Chiefs." then I would take the guy in a heartbeat.

:D

Obviously, but I would choose to have Derrick Thomas on the team before Manning.