PDA

View Full Version : Should timsatt1 be banned?



luv
12-13-2007, 10:08 PM
Vote. You can state your reasoning below. This is ultimately up to Coach and the mods to decide, but let's see what the people have to say.

timsatt1
12-13-2007, 10:11 PM
here is a little secret....I am a liberal...

....if every single one of you regulars put me on ignore, then i'd be talking to myself!!!! :)

rbedgood
12-13-2007, 10:44 PM
I would suggest that a suspension would be a more appropriate measure than a ban. I vote "yes" on the premise that some of his posts shouldn't be accepted, but I do think a permanent ban is overboard.

timsatt1
12-13-2007, 10:47 PM
problem is, in the day of proxy servers, banning is impossible. But I love me a good caning.

anaeelbackwards
12-13-2007, 10:49 PM
IMO no one should ever be banned from a site unless they do something that is well-deserving of a ban. I think he has the right to his own opinion as do everyone else.

tammietailgator
12-13-2007, 11:29 PM
here is a little secret....and it works like a democratic process...

....if every single one of you regulars put me on ignore, then i'd be talking to myself!!!! :)
I think I already mentioned that. Not sure... you did say that you would tone it down.... how many times have you been warned?

stlchief
12-13-2007, 11:37 PM
Banning him is too conservative of a step. Liberals believe in free speech, even if people are saying what you don't like.

Not that I'm saying I'm a liberal (or that I'm not), but I say let the conservative stay because liberals say he should....

rbedgood
12-13-2007, 11:40 PM
Very diplomatic STLCHIEF. I would agree that banning is overboard. I do believe at the least a warning should be issued from the "powers that be" and at most some type of suspension. I've been on other sites that have the capability of suspending a user for a time.

chief31
12-13-2007, 11:46 PM
here is a little secret....I am a liberal...

....if every single one of you regulars put me on ignore, then i'd be talking to myself!!!! :)

That would be considered cruel punishment. I don't think that anyone should have to you. Not even you. J/K

:lol:


Very diplomatic STLCHIEF. I would agree that banning is overboard. I do believe at the least a warning should be issued from the "powers that be" and at most some type of suspension. I've been on other sites that have the capability of suspending a user for a time.

I'm not sure yet, what he may have done today, but he has been warned several times about cursing and personal insults. Including a few infractions.

hermhater
12-13-2007, 11:49 PM
Suspending someone is absurd, because they will just come back and cause more trouble.

The kid is annoying, obnoxious, and ignorant but I don't believe a suspension or banning is in order.

I don't think he was personally attacking prough because he has been saying stuff like this since before prough got back to the site.

Perhaps he will learn something from us.

If not he will at least have gotten something to think about.

rbedgood
12-13-2007, 11:51 PM
Actually I've found on other sites that suspensions (1-2 weeks typically) have curtailed the behavior of problem members.

Whether he personally insulted others or not in the past or not is somewhat irrelevant. If it is against the rules, it is against the rules. Whether he is right or wrong, discussing topics by the rules of the community would seem to be the kind and appropriate manner to conduct himself.

chief31
12-13-2007, 11:51 PM
Suspending someone is absurd, because they will just come back and cause more trouble.

The kid is annoying, obnoxious, and ignorant but I don't believe a suspension or banning is in order.

I don't think he was personally attacking prough because he has been saying stuff like this since before prough got back to the site.

Perhaps he will learn something from us.

If not he will at least have gotten something to think about.

I must have missed the attack on prough91. Can anyone guide me to it?

timsatt1
12-13-2007, 11:55 PM
whenever i made the hypothetical statement that i should not feel guilty that my dad worked hard while your dad fiddled around or whatever, and he thought i was talking about HIS dad. not "a" dad. so he personal messaged me and said it wouldnt be hard to find a tim satterfield in wichita kansas blah blah blah.

that is what he considers me attacking his family.

hermhater
12-13-2007, 11:56 PM
Actually I've found on other sites that suspensions (1-2 weeks typically) have curtailed the behavior of problem members.

Whether he personally insulted others or not in the past or not is somewhat irrelevant. If it is against the rules, it is against the rules. Whether he is right or wrong, discussing topics by the rules of the community would seem to be the kind and appropriate manner to conduct himself.


I must have missed the attack on prough91. Can anyone guide me to it?


I don't know about his infractions in the past, only that prough took timsatt talking about others parents personally, when timsatt was being insensitive to millions of people, not just prough.

I don't know that it was just one post in particular, but during an entire thread timsatt decided that the reason poor people are poor is because their parents did drugs, had premarital sex, and didn't care enough about their kids to have been born with money.

Typical timsatt insensitivity.

timsatt1
12-13-2007, 11:58 PM
I don't know about his infractions in the past, only that prough took timsatt talking about others parents personally, when timsatt was being insensitive to millions of people, not just prough.

I don't know that it was just one post in particular, but during an entire thread timsatt decided that the reason poor people are poor is because their parents did drugs, had premarital sex, and didn't care enough about their kids to have been born with money.

Typical timsatt insensitivity.

i gave a hypothetical about a person who did the right things at a young age and reaps the benefits and a person who screws off in life at a young age and suffers the consequence and that it isnt right or moral that the one who did wrong and is now reaping for it is owed by the government. that was a hypothetical about one case of poverty...not every case. i know i didnt clarify, that was my fault.

Guru
12-14-2007, 12:07 AM
i gave a hypothetical about a person who did the right things at a young age and reaps the benefits and a person who screws off in life at a young age and suffers the consequence and that it isnt right or moral that the one who did wrong and is now reaping for it is owed by the government. that was a hypothetical about one case of poverty...not every case. i know i didnt clarify, that was my fault.


:sign0153: Please. I have no doubt that you mean everything you say no matter how insensitive it is. Cut it out with your "holier than thou" crap and start talking some football.

chief31
12-14-2007, 12:10 AM
I didn't see anything personal in those statements. Maybe prough91 just needed to put timsatt1 on his 'ignore' list.

timsatt1, you can be a very irritating person, on here. But, I remember being in my early twenties, myself. Later, when you look back on yourself, you may be embarrassed for yourself. Maybe not. But I know I was more ****y and judgemental than I feel that I should have been.

But, I do not see any violation of the rules there. I generalize to make my point alot too. And if it isn't specifically insulting someone, then it isn't a violation of the rules. At least not in my opinion.

I voted yes on the poll, (Just for fun.) but I will not be banning him....YET. :D

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 12:19 AM
I didn't see anything personal in those statements. Maybe prough91 just needed to put timsatt1 on his 'ignore' list.

timsatt1, you can be a very irritating person, on here. But, I remember being in my early twenties, myself. Later, when you look back on yourself, you may be embarrassed for yourself. Maybe not. But I know I was more ****y and judgemental than I feel that I should have been.

But, I do not see any violation of the rules there. I generalize to make my point alot too. And if it isn't specifically insulting someone, then it isn't a violation of the rules. At least not in my opinion.

I voted yes on the poll, (Just for fun.) but I will not be banning him....YET. :D

i voted yes just for fun as well, so now i got to figure out who the 3rd person was...that took it seriously :(!!!

but anyways, i will never look back and be embarrased as i dont have a lot of pride anyways. i dont think i am above everyone or even anyone for that matter. i think we are all equally important as we are created by God...never tried to put anyone down, trying to teach them not to rely on government but learn to do what they got to do for themselves.

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 12:36 AM
Banning him is too conservative of a step. Liberals believe in free speech, even if people are saying what you don't like.

Not that I'm saying I'm a liberal (or that I'm not), but I say let the conservative stay because liberals say he should....

i cant speak for liberals...just the leaders of the liberal party aka the house and senate leaders and speaker of house.

first off....they believe in freedom of speach? is that why the actual leaders of the liberal agenda tried to stop a private citizen, rush limbaugh, for being able to use his freedom of speach on his private radio station.

second....bringing back the fairness doctrine on the radio waves? yes, this what the democrats in the senate tried to do...make it to where the radio waves are now monitored by government, and there has to be equal time for every side, democrat and republican.

so, there is your liberals and their "freedom of speach" aka "we truly want a socialist or communist country, whichever comes first."

hermhater
12-14-2007, 12:43 AM
i cant speak for liberals...just the leaders of the liberal party aka the house and senate leaders and speaker of house.

first off....they believe in freedom of speach? is that why the actual leaders of the liberal agenda tried to stop a private citizen, rush limbaugh, for being able to use his freedom of speach on his private radio station.

second....bringing back the fairness doctrine on the radio waves? yes, this what the democrats in the senate tried to do...make it to where the radio waves are now monitored by government, and there has to be equal time for every side, democrat and republican.

so, there is your liberals and their "freedom of speach" aka "we truly want a socialist or communist country, whichever comes first."

You are so lost man...

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 12:47 AM
You are so lost man...

ok mr HH. you are a nice guy. i like you...

...but how can you just make a general statement without actually debating.


take this post you just now responded to.

first of all, have you been informed yet that Mr. Harry Reed, that would be your senate leader, called Rush Limbaugh's boss and informed rush limbaughs boss that he was upset with some of the things rush had said.

then the next day he actually spoke out against rush on the senate floor during real government work hours!!! this is government attacking a private citizen for their freedom of speach....so where exactly am i lost on this? this is actually historic what happened. this is the first time ever that the senate attacked a person for their freedom of speech on the senate floor.



and then the second thing i brought up.....the democrats in the senate tried to bring back the fairness doctrine making it to where the government would literally monitor each radio station and make sure that if a republican got 30 seconds to talk about republican issues that a democrat got his turn to share his thoughts.

where at in this am i lost.

hermhater
12-14-2007, 01:23 AM
ok mr HH. you are a nice guy. i like you...

...but how can you just make a general statement without actually debating.


take this post you just now responded to.

first of all, have you been informed yet that Mr. Harry Reed, that would be your senate leader, called Rush Limbaugh's boss and informed rush limbaughs boss that he was upset with some of the things rush had said.

then the next day he actually spoke out against rush on the senate floor during real government work hours!!! this is government attacking a private citizen for their freedom of speach....so where exactly am i lost on this? this is actually historic what happened. this is the first time ever that the senate attacked a person for their freedom of speech on the senate floor.

No it's not.



and then the second thing i brought up.....the democrats in the senate tried to bring back the fairness doctrine making it to where the government would literally monitor each radio station and make sure that if a republican got 30 seconds to talk about republican issues that a democrat got his turn to share his thoughts.

That is because Murdoch wasn't going to allow the Democrats to advertise on Fox.

Kind of defeated your own point there guy.

where at in this am i lost.

That's where you're lost for starters.

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:25 AM
That's where you're lost for starters.


ok....why are you bringing up fox? it had nothing to do with tv, only radio.

and you can bring up another time that the senate actually called out a private citizen ON THE SENATE FLOOR for using their freedom of speach.

but please wait till you are sober to respond to this discussion anymore.

everything i said in these last few responses that i posted is fact about the fairness doctrine and also the senate government attacking a private citizen for their free speach.

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:27 AM
i dont know who murdock is....but he doesnt have to let a democrat advertise on his private station.

you cannot discriminate on certain things such as race, gender, etc....but you CAN discriminate on political side.

chief31
12-14-2007, 01:27 AM
i cant speak for liberals...just the leaders of the liberal party aka the house and senate leaders and speaker of house.

first off....they believe in freedom of speach? is that why the actual leaders of the liberal agenda tried to stop a private citizen, rush limbaugh, for being able to use his freedom of speach on his private radio station.

second....bringing back the fairness doctrine on the radio waves? yes, this what the democrats in the senate tried to do...make it to where the radio waves are now monitored by government, and there has to be equal time for every side, democrat and republican.

so, there is your liberals and their "freedom of speach" aka "we truly want a socialist or communist country, whichever comes first."

You know that there are examples of each side of the floor going against the consensus of what their side of the floor generally represents. It is no big miracle.

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:31 AM
You know that there are examples of each side of the floor going against the consensus of what their side of the floor generally represents. It is no big miracle.


yeah, to a degree there is, but the issues i am talking about is a very big deal...trying to stop a person's freedom of speach.

the democrats and the media are pretty much on the same page....but are you telling me that the actual people that are to the left are not in line with the media and political leaders? the ones that i know sure are.

hermhater
12-14-2007, 01:34 AM
i dont know who murdock is....but he doesnt have to let a democrat advertise on his private station.

you cannot discriminate on certain things such as race, gender, etc....but you CAN discriminate on political side.

Not to suppress the campaign of a political contender because of their politics.

The publication has the right to censor content (because of obscenity) but not to disallow advertising from any political party.

I thought you would have known that.

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:35 AM
Not to suppress the campaign of a political contender because of their politics.

The publication has the right to censor content (because of obscenity) but not to disallow advertising from any political party.

I thought you would have known that.

ok i think you are right on this one, i think i have heard that before....it is true that you cannot suppress a political contender...


...but this issue had nothing to do with when the senate brought up the fairness doctrine. they were specifically talking about "talk radio" and the imbalance of it....conservatives dominating the liberals.

chief31
12-14-2007, 01:40 AM
yeah, to a degree there is, but the issues i am talking about is a very big deal...trying to stop a person's freedom of speach.

the democrats and the media are pretty much on the same page....but are you telling me that the actual people that are to the left are not in line with the media and political leaders? the ones that i know sure are.

The media is the same as anything else. They have a "left side", and a "right side". And most people who are "on the left" don't consider themselves to be " on the left". They are considered to be so, by those who aren't.

Myself, and most people that I know, I consider myself to be neither, on the left, nor on the right. Because there are issues that I agree with one side, whereas I agree with the other side on other issues.

So, no. I don't agree with "people are in line with..." statement.

hermhater
12-14-2007, 01:40 AM
ok i think you are right on this one, i think i have heard that before....it is true that you cannot suppress a political contender...


...but this issue had nothing to do with when the senate brought up the fairness doctrine. they were specifically talking about "talk radio" and the imbalance of it....conservatives dominating the liberals.

This comment makes me assume you heard about this particular issues on talk radio, and that it was Rush, in particular.

If this is the case I assume there was a bias in his reporting, so I cannot comment on the issue at hand.

I will have to research the issue to inform you why you are wrong!

:D

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:42 AM
The media is the same as anything else. They have a "left side", and a "right side". And most people who are "on the left" don't consider themselves to be " on the left". They are considered to be so, by those who aren't.

Myself, and most people that I know, I consider myself to be neither, on the left, nor on the right. Because there are issues that I agree with one side, whereas I agree with the other side on other issues.

So, no. I don't agree with "people are in line with..." statement.


ok, ill agree that there are many independends out there that dont agree with mainstream media and some liberals that just arent as far left as the mainstream media.

so...there...i finally agreed with you. you get a lolipop!

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:43 AM
This comment makes me assume you heard about this particular issues on talk radio, and that it was Rush, in particular.

If this is the case I assume there was a bias in his reporting, so I cannot comment on the issue at hand.

I will have to research the issue to inform you why you are wrong!

:D

drudge report, rush limbaugh, fox news, then even went to the Clinton News Network, msnbc, NY times...i go through it all...but go ahead and do your research then u can enlighten me tomorrow aka later today.

Guru
12-14-2007, 01:48 AM
It is SPEECH not SPEACH.

You want to be accepted as intelligent and can't spell the damn word you feel so strongly about?

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:49 AM
It is SPEECH not SPEACH.

You want to be accepted as intelligent and can't spell the damn word you feel so strongly about?


yeah i was actually debating which spelling it was and kept changing it...then posted the wrong one. yes i realize there is a spell checker up there...too lazy to check it. you can accept me however you want to!!! :bananen_smilies046:


oh and by the way i have the freedom of speech and the freedom of type and if i want to spell it speach then i have that freedom too!!! until harry reed takes it away from me.

chief31
12-14-2007, 01:50 AM
yeah, to a degree there is, but the issues i am talking about is a very big deal...trying to stop a person's freedom of speach.

the democrats and the media are pretty much on the same page....but are you telling me that the actual people that are to the left are not in line with the media and political leaders? the ones that i know sure are.


ok, ill agree that there are many independends out there that dont agree with mainstream media and some liberals that just arent as far left as the mainstream media.

so...there...i finally agreed with you. you get a lolipop!

Great. I forgot that I said I was done with political discussions here and was done either way.

But... Just like you were ranting and calling everyone here libs, that is how people get classified as "left", or "right", in most cases that I have ever seen.

chief31
12-14-2007, 01:52 AM
you can accept me however you want to!!! :bananen_smilies046:





Or we can reject you altogether. :lol:

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 01:53 AM
Or we can reject you altogether. :lol:


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!

please dont. i do not take well to rejection.

hermhater
12-14-2007, 01:54 AM
yeah i was actually debating which spelling it was and kept changing it...then posted the wrong one. yes i realize there is a spell checker up there...too lazy to check it. you can accept me however you want to!!! :bananen_smilies046:


oh and by the way i have the freedom of speech and the freedom of type and if i want to spell it speach then i have that freedom too!!! until harry reed takes it away from me.

Thank God your parents weren't too lazy or you would have been born poor and addicted to drugs, and premarital sex!

Thank God they weren't lazy so you CAN be!

Guru
12-14-2007, 01:59 AM
I am feeling the need to kill this thread for the sake of sanity.

timsatt1
12-14-2007, 02:09 AM
Thank God your parents weren't too lazy or you would have been born poor and addicted to drugs, and premarital sex!

Thank God they weren't lazy so you CAN be!


haha...ok so even though this joke was directed at me....it was pretty funny. and i just got off the phone with chuch norris, and he said it is sometimes ok to laugh at yourself.

hermhater
12-14-2007, 02:13 AM
haha...ok so even though this joke was directed at me....it was pretty funny. and i just got off the phone with chuch norris, and he said it is sometimes ok to laugh at yourself.

Wow folks did you see that right there???

That's what we call having class.

:sign0098:

chief31
12-14-2007, 02:15 AM
Wow folks did you see that right there???

That's what we call having class.

:sign0098:

I believe that if it was done by timsatt1, it has to go by another name. :D

hermhater
12-14-2007, 02:45 AM
haha...ok so even though this joke was directed at me....it was pretty funny. and i just got off the phone with chuch norris, and he said it is sometimes ok to laugh at yourself.


Wow folks did you see that right there???

That's what we call not being such an ***.

:sign0098:


I believe that if it was done by timsatt1, it has to go by another name. :D

FMRFY!

(Fixed My Reply For You!)

:lol: :D

Chiefster
12-15-2007, 05:55 AM
As a mod I shall abstain.

sling58
12-15-2007, 07:16 AM
I just choose to ignore him.

Canada
12-15-2007, 07:36 AM
Wow folks did you see that right there???

That's what we call having class.

:sign0098:

That's our Tim....he put the *** in Class!! :bananen_smilies046:

rbedgood
12-15-2007, 11:55 AM
That's our Tim....he IS the *** in Class!! :bananen_smilies046:

Edited your reply...(it didn't need fixin' just another way to look at it)

IlovetheChiefs
12-15-2007, 12:25 PM
Say, these last 2 posts reminded me of another great name a baseball player had! But I'll post it in the appropriate thread.

timsatt1
12-15-2007, 12:32 PM
Say, these last 2 posts reminded me of another great name a baseball player had! But I'll post it in the appropriate thread.


i played little league with a guy named Blake Hurlbutt.

he just finished his last season with the Wichita State Shockers.

Hurlbutt is the weirdest last name i have heard.

IlovetheChiefs
12-15-2007, 12:35 PM
i played little league with a guy named Blake Hurlbutt.

he just finished his last season with the Wichita State Shockers.

Hurlbutt is the weirdest last name i have heard.

Well the guy I recalled was Brian Asselstine but Blake Hurlbutt just reminded me of Dave Butz on the Redskins!

McLovin
12-16-2007, 04:18 PM
I voted, but then put Timsatt on ignore his ignorance finally gets to ya. Well as far as banning him, I could care less I just banned him myself, I just hope he doesnt keep others from coming to this wonderful board. I am quite sure he has cost us some members already.

timsatt1
12-16-2007, 04:47 PM
I voted, but then put Timsatt on ignore his ignorance finally gets to ya. Well as far as banning him, I could care less I just banned him myself, I just hope he doesnt keep others from coming to this wonderful board. I am quite sure he has cost us some members already.


lol....

message too short. oh well, all i have to say is lol

luv
12-16-2007, 04:56 PM
lol....

message too short. oh well, all i have to say is lol
Hey genius, why are you responding to someone who has you on ignore?

McLovin
12-16-2007, 04:59 PM
That's our Tim....he put the *** in Class!! :bananen_smilies046:
And if it is a gay pride class he would take the class in his ***.

Chiefster
12-16-2007, 05:00 PM
Hey genius, why are you responding to someone who has you on ignore?

That's freakin hilarious!

timsatt1
12-16-2007, 09:07 PM
Hey genius, why are you responding to someone who has you on ignore?


because i am such the genius that i know bronxy cannot resist not knowing what i said, so he truly doesnt have me on ignore...

...plus, Ms. Genius, he DOESNT HAVE YOU ON IGNORE...so now that YOU responded to that message, using my quotes, he can now see what I typed :)

anaeelbackwards
12-16-2007, 09:20 PM
And if it is a gay pride class he would take the class in his ***.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: R-E-P.:sign0104:

YZILLA
12-16-2007, 11:17 PM
OK I broke the tie , I voted no because I believe he has a right to speak his mind as long as it isn't a personal attack . This is America after all and we have means to choose not to associate with him if want ! We are already becoming a country where we cant even say the pledge of allegiance to our flag because it might offend some kids parents. What happened to us? I remember saying the pledge to our country every day in school when I was young. The other day I thought to myself someones gonna flip out at a school board meeting because my sons first grade class had a song that said Jesus in it. This Timstat deal is so small compared to what we really should be focused on in life . I wont say anything personal to him again, If he chooses to do otherwise I will ignore ! God bless America and Canada ! and all of you !

tammietailgator
12-16-2007, 11:19 PM
Nice!!!!! Very good post especially during the holiday season. Bless you too!

Canada
12-17-2007, 08:24 AM
OK I broke the tie , I voted no because I believe he has a right to speak his mind as long as it isn't a personal attack . This is America after all and we have means to choose not to associate with him if want ! We are already becoming a country where we cant even say the pledge of allegiance to our flag because it might offend some kids parents. What happened to us? I remember saying the pledge to our country every day in school when I was young. The other day I thought to myself someones gonna flip out at a school board meeting because my sons first grade class had a song that said Jesus in it. This Timstat deal is so small compared to what we really should be focused on in life . I wont say anything personal to him again, If he chooses to do otherwise I will ignore ! God bless America and Canada ! and all of you !

I voted Yes....just for something to do!!



And thanx for the blessing man!! :bananen_smilies046:

prough91
12-17-2007, 08:45 AM
I voted Yes....just for something to do!!



And thanx for the blessing man!! :bananen_smilies046:

What gives? We all get lumped in together and you get your own special call out?

Canada
12-17-2007, 08:48 AM
What gives? We all get lumped in together and you get your own special call out?

Move to Canada man!! :bananen_smilies046:

rbedgood
12-19-2007, 05:41 AM
Ahhh...and the verdict is in...looks like TimSatt has earned himself some time in the clubhouse...

You're Fired

YouTube - Brian Mandelbaum Gets Fired

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 07:19 AM
Ahhh...and the verdict is in...looks like TimSatt has earned himself some time in the clubhouse...

You're Fired

YouTube - Brian Mandelbaum Gets Fired (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91VRDm3jv4E)

Not an overwhelming majority.

http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/1066/pollzp7.jpg

Canada
12-19-2007, 07:23 AM
Who said it had to be overwhelming??

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 07:25 AM
Who said it had to be overwhelming??

No one; just yet another one of my useless facts. :D

Canada
12-19-2007, 07:28 AM
No one; just yet another one of my useless facts. :D


awww....they aren't useless. You facts are all stored in the back of my mind and ready to pull out at any moment.

chief31
12-19-2007, 07:32 AM
awww....they aren't useless. You facts are all stored in the back of my mind and ready to pull out at any moment.

Uhhhhh...huuhhh-huuuhhh-huuuhhh. You said "pull out". :yahoo:

chief31
12-19-2007, 07:33 AM
Uhhhhh...huuhhh-huuuhhh-huuuhhh. You said "pull out". :yahoo:

Which reminds me... I have a t-shirt that says "Don't worry, I always pull-out."

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 07:40 AM
awww....they aren't useless. You facts are all stored in the back of my mind and ready to pull out at any moment.


Really? For me, once stated the useless fact is gone forever. :p

Canada
12-19-2007, 08:25 AM
Which reminds me... I have a t-shirt that says "Don't worry, I always pull-out."

:lol::bananen_smilies046:

Canada
12-19-2007, 08:25 AM
Really? For me, once stated the useless fact is gone forever. :p

I guess so at your age!! :11:

luv
12-19-2007, 10:55 AM
Which reminds me... I have a t-shirt that says "Don't worry, I always pull-out."
Oviously not soon enough. How many kids do you have? Might want to work on your timing. :p

luv
12-19-2007, 10:59 AM
Not an overwhelming majority.


15 people voted. Where was there room for the majority to be overwhelming? :p

Just a question, though. Was he?

rbedgood
12-19-2007, 11:52 AM
Not an overwhelming majority.

http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/

I wasn't referring to the numbers of the poll, more in the results. Tim's actually banning had more to do with his consistent behavior than anything we voted on, but it was an opportunity to invoke "The Donald". :yahoo:

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 12:32 PM
15 people voted. Where was there room for the majority to be overwhelming? :p

Just a question, though. Was he?

There wasn't really unless it was like 15-0 or 10-5 or something like that.

...And, not to my knowledge, but I will be happy to discuss the possibility with Coach and the other mods. However, admittedly I have not read all of his replies, but from what I've seen he has not actively engaged in rule violations and unfortunately being a nuisance is not one of them.


I wasn't referring to the numbers of the poll, more in the results. Tim's actually banning had more to do with his consistent behavior than anything we voted on, but it was an opportunity to invoke "The Donald". :yahoo:

HA! :lol:

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 12:34 PM
Now it's 8-8, my projected Chiefs record for this year; unfortunately I was waaaaaaaayyyyy off.

rbedgood
12-19-2007, 12:36 PM
Now it's 8-8, my projected Chiefs record for this year; unfortunately I was waaaaaaaayyyyy off.

Ahh...but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote...:lol:

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 12:51 PM
Ahh...but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote...:lol:

I guess it's a good thing that I haven't voted then or the majority would probably swing in the other direction.

:lol:

luv
12-19-2007, 01:01 PM
I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 01:11 PM
I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

Yup, chief31 did a fine job temporarily banning him for very good reasons.

anaeelbackwards
12-19-2007, 01:15 PM
I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

yeah i just saw that too.

so does that mean he doesn't post anymore?! and what about play cards?!

what happened? did he just really go overboard?

DTFan4life
12-19-2007, 01:42 PM
i voted yes just for fun as well, so now i got to figure out who the 3rd person was...that took it seriously :(!!!




There wasn't really unless it was like 15-0 or 10-5 or something like that.

...And, not to my knowledge, but I will be happy to discuss the possibility with Coach and the other mods. However, admittedly I have not read all of his replies, but from what I've seen he has not actively engaged in rule violations and unfortunately being a nuisance is not one of them.



HA! :lol:

he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.

luv
12-19-2007, 01:47 PM
he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.
Hmmmm....

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 01:49 PM
Hmmmm....

Yes; provocative.

hermhater
12-19-2007, 01:56 PM
I tried to warn him in PM, but he said he couldn't be banned because he is a master of proxy servers, and doesn't have a clue.

Chiefster
12-19-2007, 01:59 PM
yeah i just saw that too.

so does that mean he doesn't post anymore?! and what about play cards?!

what happened? did he just really go overboard?


So, it would seem.

DTFan4life
12-19-2007, 04:38 PM
I tried to warn him in PM, but he said he couldn't be banned because he is a master of proxy servers, and doesn't have a clue.


damn proxy servers. what are those anyways?:funnypost:

hermhater
12-19-2007, 06:32 PM
he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.


Hmmmm....

I second that luv....


Hmmmm...

(sniff)

Guru
12-19-2007, 07:51 PM
Ahh...but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote...:lol:
I haven't voted yet.

spiman
12-19-2007, 08:03 PM
I'm with H.H. Maybe he can learn from us O.D's (old dudes) Either he should quit drinking toooo much (my case drink more) or attribute his posts to his age of maturity. I won't vote on this 1. Sounds like an attack on free speech! Well U guys did it now-now lets watch this 1 unfold..Soap opera cental on a Chiefs forum, Huh?

hermhater
12-19-2007, 08:05 PM
Ahh...but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote...:lol:


I haven't voted yet.

I think he meant chief31, because he suspended his account for a week...

You mods all look alike!

:lol:

chief31
12-19-2007, 10:31 PM
He posted the link to that hideous girls/cup video, that had already been deleted once. This, after he had asked if he could post a link to innapropriate material in another case, and been told 'no', by me, and 'yes, if he included a warning about the material' by another MOD or Coach. (According to him)

He failed to post a warning, and, In my opinion, that video should most definitely not have any link from this site.

hermhater
12-19-2007, 11:03 PM
I wonder what drove him to do it...

Because he has so much respect for authority, or his desire for a forum where he can be an obnoxious celebrity like Rush?

:lol:

McLovin
12-19-2007, 11:22 PM
As I say don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.

I was wondering is this a temp ban (lesson) or permanent.

DTFan4life
12-19-2007, 11:31 PM
:beer:
As I say don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.

I was wondering is this a temp ban (lesson) or permanent.


i hope it is permanent.

chief31
12-19-2007, 11:37 PM
As I say don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.

I was wondering is this a temp ban (lesson) or permanent.

It was just for one week. I think that overall, he has become a much better member over the past few weeks, so I thought it would be fair to give him another chance, yet again.

Canada
12-19-2007, 11:38 PM
It was just for one week. I think that overall, he has become a much better member over the past few weeks, so I thought it would be fair to give him another chance, yet again.

U shoulda played cards last night. He is in a world of sh!t if he shows up at a game that I am at!! :bananen_smilies046:

chief31
12-19-2007, 11:48 PM
U shoulda played cards last night. He is in a world of sh!t if he shows up at a game that I am at!! :bananen_smilies046:
I believe I was in the process of imposing my :sign0106: on him, around that time. :D ( Or shortly thereafter)

hermhater
12-19-2007, 11:52 PM
:beer:


i hope it is permanent.


Have you ever thought about using a capital "I" when referencing yourself?

It would make you much less conspicuous...

:D

Rush Limbaugh
12-20-2007, 01:09 AM
Greetings fellow Americans. Timsatt1 should not be banned because this is a free country with freedom of speech, which congress is currently trying to take away from me, your el rushbo.

Canada
12-20-2007, 01:10 AM
Greetings fellow Americans. Timsatt1 should not be banned because this is a free country with freedom of speech, which congress is currently trying to take away from me, your el rushbo.

rush limaugh sucks....so stfu!!

Chiefster
12-20-2007, 01:11 AM
Greetings fellow Americans. Timsatt1 should not be banned because this is a free country with freedom of speech, which congress is currently trying to take away from me, your el rushbo.

Bu-bye timmy.

McLovin
12-20-2007, 01:11 AM
Greetings fellow Americans. Timsatt1 should not be banned because this is a free country with freedom of speech, which congress is currently trying to take away from me, your el rushbo.
I think this blatant disregard for the mods on this site would justify a permanent ban.

Guru
12-20-2007, 01:12 AM
And to think. I like Rush.

Canada
12-20-2007, 01:17 AM
And to think. I like Rush.

I don't know much about him, but I am starting to dislike him because I associate him with tims

hermhater
12-20-2007, 01:20 AM
I think the funniest thing about this thread is that the poll is still tied!

:lol:

Chiefster
12-20-2007, 01:20 AM
I don't know much about him, but I am starting to dislike him because I associate him with tims

I'm sure Rush would waste no time disassociating with tim.

McLovin
12-20-2007, 01:25 AM
I think the funniest thing about this thread is that the poll is still tied!

:lol:
Give me another vote or 5 and it wont be tied, stupid thing is if Tim would have had half a brain he would have voted against being banned the first time, and then would have voted against him being banned on this User Name - before opening his mouth and getting himself rebanned.

tornadospotter
12-20-2007, 01:40 AM
And to think. I like Rush.
Me to. Why can't we all on this forum just be citizens of the Chiefs Nation, and not talk about politics. I have strong political opinions! But I do not want to use this forum to express them, I just want to be a Chiefs Fan, and be able to talk to and read about other Chiefs fans thoughts of our team. Be a member of the Chiefs Crowd, have discussions on what is going on in the Chiefs Crowd members lives, because that is what is our common denominator, we all love the KC Chiefs, and this is a place to come together and talk about the Chiefs, and share about selfs and family if we wish!

Chiefster
12-20-2007, 01:43 AM
I just voted and now it's 10-10; although it's after the fact.

hermhater
12-20-2007, 01:45 AM
Me to. Why can't we all on this forum just be citizens of the Chiefs Nation, and not talk about politics. I have strong political opinions! But I do not want to use this forum to express them, I just want to be a Chiefs Fan, and be able to talk to and read about other Chiefs fans thoughts of our team. Be a member of the Chiefs Crowd, have discussions on what is going on in the Chiefs Crowd members lives, because that is what is our common denominator, we all love the KC Chiefs, and this is a place to come together and talk about the Chiefs, and share about selfs and family if we wish!

GO CHIEFS!!!!!

Guru
12-20-2007, 01:49 AM
Wow. It is a landslide.

Chiefster
12-20-2007, 01:50 AM
Wow. It is a landslide.


HA! I'll bet it's not over yet either. :lol::lol:

McLovin
12-20-2007, 01:50 AM
All Hail King Guru, Seriously though REP.

hermhater
12-20-2007, 01:51 AM
Wow. It is a landslide.

I figured it would have been that way from the first vote.

Nice Guru!

:sign0098:

Chiefster
12-20-2007, 01:54 AM
I told ya the landslide would continue to grow. :D

hermhater
12-20-2007, 03:17 AM
I told ya the landslide would continue to grow. :D

Heh!

:sign0098:

Chiefster
12-20-2007, 05:53 PM
Heh!

:sign0098:

:bananen_smilies046:

Canada
12-20-2007, 06:21 PM
He is Raiderhater....he is sending me pm's. just so u know!!

spiman
12-20-2007, 08:26 PM
Ditto Tornado..I still won't vote.. Soaps, We have stinking soaps. & I like Rush--and getting them.

raiderhater
12-20-2007, 09:37 PM
He is Raiderhater....he is sending me pms. just so u know!!

What? I like to play with soap. I like how it slips all around.

Canada
12-20-2007, 09:43 PM
premenstrual syndrome? how is he sending that to you?

I still don;t get y you want to be where u are so obviously not wanted.

raiderhater
12-20-2007, 09:48 PM
I still don;t get y you want to be where u are so obviously not wanted.


What? I like to play with soap. I like how it slips all around.

Canada
12-20-2007, 11:07 PM
what are you talking about? i feel the love. dont deny it. you feel it too.

yeah, I can see how much everyone wants you here. Why do you have to try and ruin a good thing? I don't get it. Everyone here gets along and then you have to show up and act like a total *** and try and ruin it for eveyone. I don't understand. Its not like people here did anything to you.

anaeelbackwards
12-20-2007, 11:37 PM
timsatt was banned

tim though will never be outof this board.....

WELCOME BACK TIMMY!

Guru
12-20-2007, 11:46 PM
timsatt was banned

tim though will never be outof this board.....

WELCOME BACK TIMMY!
Why are you encouraging him?

hermhater
12-21-2007, 01:15 AM
timsatt was banned

tim though will never be outof this board.....

WELCOME BACK TIMMY!


Why are you encouraging him?

timmsatt and all of his alter ego's will be gone soon...

I have faith in Coach.

chief31
12-21-2007, 01:41 AM
timmsatt and all of his alter ego's will be gone soon...

I have faith in Coach.

timsatt1 is now the private property of chief31, so better watch how you treat my *****. :yahoo:

Guru
12-21-2007, 02:01 AM
timsatt1 is now the private property of chief31, so better watch how you treat my *****. :yahoo:
Not if I claim it first. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

hermhater
12-21-2007, 02:47 AM
timsatt1 is now the private property of chief31, so better watch how you treat my *****. :yahoo:


Not if I claim it first. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Just edit all his posts to say "My bunghole hurts (whimper)..."

Screw him over royaly guys!

:sign0098:

Guru
12-21-2007, 02:48 AM
Just edit all his posts to say "My bunghole hurts (whimper)..."

Screw him over royaly guys!

:sign0098:
http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Beavis-Butthead---Cornholio-Magnet-C11750969.jpeg

rbedgood
12-21-2007, 02:56 AM
I think he meant chief31, because he suspended his account for a week...

You mods all look alike!

:lol:

Correct you are my friend. However Chiefster looks older than the rest...

chief31
12-21-2007, 03:02 AM
Not if I claim it first. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

How about if you claim the rest of his alter-egos?

Guru
12-21-2007, 03:11 AM
How about if you claim the rest of his alter-egos?

Nah. you can have the slimy *******.:D

chief31
12-21-2007, 03:16 AM
Judging by the poll results, he should be banned many times over. So, he is well on his way to helping us complete that task. :yahoo:

spiman
12-22-2007, 01:50 AM
&& the soaps continue..I do wonder if Timmey is a pitcher or a catcher..you guys started the buttt jokes..also I do have to wonder what the heck posesses the little guy? Short mans complex? If I knew how to start a thread I would direct one to him. "Grow UP Timmey & take a hint"

Chiefster
12-22-2007, 11:01 PM
http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/

JAVA!!! CAPPUCCINO!!!

hermhater
12-22-2007, 11:36 PM
&& the soaps continue..I do wonder if Timmey is a pitcher or a catcher..you guys started the buttt jokes..also I do have to wonder what the heck posesses the little guy? Short mans complex? If I knew how to start a thread I would direct one to him. "Grow UP Timmey & take a hint"

As it stands, timsatt is fair game for mocking, slander, and ridicule.

He is no longer a member of the board and can be attacked wantonly, and at will.

Remember no foul language, but personal attacks are welcome!

Also chief31 posted his personal information, as well as info about his relations.

Tim is an ***, and searching for attention in the worst possible way.

May he be butt raped by a goat while giving fellatio to his pet boar!

:mob: