PDA

View Full Version : Finishing order of the AFC West in 2006



Guru
06-03-2006, 04:19 AM
What order do you think our division will finish in this year?

My pick...

1. KC
2. Oakland - a hunch
3. Denver
4. San Diego

If Rivers is a real diamond in the rough, swap them with Denver. They need to fully understand what they got in Plummer.

Chiefster
06-03-2006, 04:22 AM
Guru wrote:
What order do you think our division will finish in this year?

My pick...

1. KC
2. Oakland - a hunch
3. Denver
4. San Diego

If Rivers is a real diamond in the rough, swap them with Denver. They need to fully understand what they got in Plummer.

I have them differently:

1. KC
2. San Diego
3. Denver
4. Oakland

No scientific reasoning; just guessing. :-)

KC-Krazo
06-03-2006, 04:31 AM
1. KC
2. Oakland
3. Denver
4. San Diego they screwed themselves getting rid of breeze.

Guru
06-03-2006, 04:34 AM
KC-Krazo wrote:


4. San Diego they screwed themselves getting rid of breeze.

That is exactly why I put them there too.

KC-Krazo
06-04-2006, 02:37 AM
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:

Chiefster
06-04-2006, 02:43 AM
KC-Krazo wrote:
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, he is Marty.

Guru
06-05-2006, 12:13 AM
Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, he is Marty.

And if Marty is anything, he is predictable. He was not behind letting Brees go.

Chiefster
06-05-2006, 12:29 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, he is Marty.

And if Marty is anything, he is predictable. He was not behind letting Brees go.

Exactly!

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 01:02 AM
This is how the Pro Football Weekly has the order:

1. Broncos: 11-5

2. Chargers: 10-6

3. Chiefs: 10-6

4. Raiders: 6-10

This is how I know we'll take the division...(I hope) :pint:

Guru
06-06-2006, 01:13 AM
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 02:11 AM
Guru wrote:
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Yeah; he's been definitely hitting the bong too hard.

Guru
06-06-2006, 02:17 AM
Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Yeah; he's been definitely hitting the bong too hard.

Nah, that is beyond stupid.... :roll:

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 03:23 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Yeah; he's been definitely hitting the bong too hard.

Nah, that is beyond stupid.... :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

Guru
06-06-2006, 03:24 AM
Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

But... then again.... :-D :-D

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 03:40 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

But... then again.... :-D :-D

Ummmless filling??? :lol:

Guru
06-06-2006, 03:46 AM
Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

But... then again.... :-D :-D

Ummmless filling??? :lol:


Kind of the opinion... Stupid.... America. At least sometimes.

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 04:16 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!


But... then again.... :-D :-D

Ummmless filling??? :lol:


Kind of the opinion... Stupid.... America. At least sometimes.

Who's the group activity leader here? We've gotten why off the beaten path. 8-)

Guru
06-06-2006, 04:18 AM
I want to report a thread hijacking. http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/rules.gif

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 04:38 AM
Guru wrote:
I want to report a thread hijacking. http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/


What did the suspect/s look like???

Guru
06-06-2006, 04:50 AM
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 04:56 AM
Guru wrote:
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll bet the resemblance to us would be purely coincidental.

Guru
06-06-2006, 04:58 AM
Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll bet the resemblance to us would be purely coincidental.

Why... whatevah do you mean? (in my best Doc Holiday - played by Val Kilmer)

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 05:01 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll bet the resemblance to us would be purely coincidental.

Why... whatevah do you mean? (in my best Doc Holiday - played by Val Kilmer)

:lol:

I love that show. I gotta get to bed.


Nite Crowd!

KC-Krazo
06-06-2006, 12:08 PM
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Chiefster
06-06-2006, 01:40 PM
KC-Krazo wrote:
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Thats what I say. Herm outta hang it up in the locker room, bring it to their attention every single day and keep LJ running mad.

KC-Krazo
06-06-2006, 03:47 PM
Mabey all those nicks and bruises wont be enough to keep um off the field if they are actually pissed! :-D :-D

Guru
06-07-2006, 12:58 AM
Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Thats what I say. Herm outta hang it up in the locker room, bring it to their attention every single day and keep LJ running mad.

Nah, just remind LJ that he will never make it in this league. 8-)

Chiefster
06-07-2006, 01:50 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Thats what I say. Herm outta hang it up in the locker room, bring it to their attention every single day and keep LJ running mad.

Nah, just remind LJ that he will never make it in this league. 8-)

:lol: :lol:

Yeah, keep tellin him that he needs to take the diapers off.

KC-Krazo
06-07-2006, 10:38 AM
That sh*ts all smoke and mirrors. I been watchin L.J for years he always ran that way. His dad put that in him.I'm suprised HE isn't working for the chiefs.Seems like we constantly here about him. :roll: :roll:

chief31
06-07-2006, 01:27 PM
Chiefs fan realist
K.C. 13-3 Den. 14-2
S.D. 8-8 K.C. 10-6
oAK. 6-10 Oak. 6-10
DEN. 0-16 S.D. 6-10

I'm kinda torn.

Chiefster
06-07-2006, 02:07 PM
KC-Krazo wrote:
That sh*ts all smoke and mirrors. I been watchin L.J for years he always ran that way. His dad put that in him.I'm suprised HE isn't working for the chiefs.Seems like we constantly here about him. :roll: :roll:

Yeah; much of what we hear about NFL teams/players are smoke and mirrios.

chief31
07-28-2006, 04:09 PM
Chiefs '06 season (revised)

5-11.

Larry Johnson - 1147 yds rushing

Trent Green -3 tds 8 ints (injured week four)

Looks like a very boring team now. The only play that I can see them gaining yards on is a dive up the middle for three yards.(we just became the Jets)

Excitement is now gone for me.

Guru
07-29-2006, 12:54 AM
chief31 wrote:
Chiefs '06 season (revised)

5-11.

Larry Johnson - 1147 yds rushing

Trent Green -3 tds 8 ints (injured week four)

Looks like a very boring team now. The only play that I can see them gaining yards on is a dive up the middle for three yards.(we just became the Jets)

Excitement is now gone for me.

Lighten up Francis. It is day one.

Chiefster
07-29-2006, 01:56 AM
While I'm very disapointed that Roaf is gone, I'm not ready to jump on the doom and gloom band wagon; I'm holding out some ray of hope.

hyperlite
08-13-2006, 09:22 PM
The donks should be our main competition, but I question their QB play :-D. Another factor is their defensive losses.

Pick: 10-6

Sandyego will have problems early with new quarterback Rivers and their pass D will finall catch up with them.

Pick: 7-9

The Faiders will have problems in all areas. :hammer:

Pick 5-11

Chiefs: No need for reason

Pick 12-4

1. Chiefs
2. Donks
3. Sandyeggo
4. Faiders

IMHO

Chiefster
08-13-2006, 10:57 PM
hyperlite wrote:
The donks should be our main competition, but I question their QB play :-D. Another factor is their defensive losses.

Pick: 10-6

Sandyego will have problems early with new quarterback Rivers and their pass D will finall catch up with them.

Pick: 7-9

The Faiders will have problems in all areas. :hammer:

Pick 5-11

Chiefs: No need for reason

Pick 12-4

1. Chiefs
2. Donks
3. Sandyeggo
4. Faiders

IMHO

Is this your non homer opinion? ;-)

hyperlite
08-14-2006, 12:26 AM
It's more in between.

Actually, I'd think 11-5. Seriously.

Homer: 13-3

chiefjon
08-22-2006, 02:27 PM
I think the donkeys will sneak the division title at like 12-4 chiefs 10-6 again bolts 8-8 if LT stays healthy and faiders 6-10!!!

Old_admin
08-22-2006, 09:01 PM
Let's see.
Chiefs
Donks
Chargers
Raiders.

The Chiefs better step it up though. They have really been stinking it up in the preseason. Of course, last year the Colts were 0-5 in pre-season. They almost went undefeated.

chief31
08-23-2006, 10:56 AM
I have no problem with the Chiefs losing ALL of their pre-season games. I have a problem with their inability to move the ball on offense.

First team, second team, no matter who is out there. The offense appears to be weak. The losses from the off-season have left us with a wet noodle of an offense.

Then, you look at the defense. There is no reason to expect a dramatic turnaround from last season's sub-par performance. The saying goes...."Rome wasn't built in a day." Well, it wasn't built in one off-season either. I expect an improvement on defense. But, I certainly don't expect a big enough improvement for the defense to carry a slow offense this season.

I have changed my view of this season. I now see my Chiefs as a team that is rebuilding. I hate that, but I can't find a reason to believe otherwise. Also, next off-season promises to bring us another rebuilding season in '07.

I will watch my beloved team with alot of hope and passion. However, 5-11 will not baffle me.

Chiefster
08-24-2006, 08:02 AM
chief31 wrote:
I have no problem with the Chiefs losing ALL of their pre-season games. I have a problem with their inability to move the ball on offense.

First team, second team, no matter who is out there. The offense appears to be weak. The losses from the off-season have left us with a wet noodle of an offense.

Then, you look at the defense. There is no reason to expect a dramatic turnaround from last season's sub-par performance. The saying goes...."Rome wasn't built in a day." Well, it wasn't built in one off-season either. I expect an improvement on defense. But, I certainly don't expect a big enough improvement for the defense to carry a slow offense this season.

I have changed my view of this season. I now see my Chiefs as a team that is rebuilding. I hate that, but I can't find a reason to believe otherwise. Also, next off-season promises to bring us another rebuilding season in '07.

I will watch my beloved team with alot of hope and passion. However, 5-11 will not baffle me.

I will go into this season with no expectations; that way there are no surprises unless they are pleasant ones. Thanks for the observations. Good post! :-)

Guru
08-25-2006, 01:05 AM
Chiefster wrote:

I will go into this season with no expectations; that way there are no surprises unless they are pleasant ones. Thanks for the observations. Good post! :-)

Liar!!!! ;-)

Chiefster
08-25-2006, 01:33 AM
Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:

I will go into this season with no expectations; that way there are no surprises unless they are pleasant ones. Thanks for the observations. Good post! :-)

Liar!!!! ;-)
:lol:
Hey, I'll have you know that I'm sitting up. 8-)

chief31
09-10-2006, 04:21 PM
Well, I guess I overestimated our offensive tackles. I had expected Greens injury in week four. And, we didn't become the jets, we became the Texans.

Chiefster
09-12-2006, 09:07 AM
Bump.

Guru
09-13-2006, 01:20 AM
1. San Diego
2. Denver
3. KC
4. Oakland

feel free to reverse 3 and 4 if you choose. I can't bring myself to do it.

Chiefster
09-13-2006, 01:38 AM
Guru wrote:
1. San Diego
2. Denver
3. KC
4. Oakland

feel free to reverse 3 and 4 if you choose. I can't bring myself to do it.

Same here. :-(