Finishing order of the AFC West in 2006

[Guru]

What order do you think our division will finish in this year?

My pick...

1. KC
2. Oakland - a hunch
3. Denver
4. San Diego

If Rivers is a real diamond in the rough, swap them with Denver. They need to fully understand what they got in Plummer.

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:
What order do you think our division will finish in this year?

My pick...

1. KC
2. Oakland - a hunch
3. Denver
4. San Diego

If Rivers is a real diamond in the rough, swap them with Denver. They need to fully understand what they got in Plummer.

I have them differently:

1. KC
2. San Diego
3. Denver
4. Oakland

No scientific reasoning; just guessing. :-)

[KC-Krazo]

1. KC
2. Oakland
3. Denver
4. San Diego they screwed themselves getting rid of breeze.

[Guru]

KC-Krazo wrote:


4. San Diego they screwed themselves getting rid of breeze.

That is exactly why I put them there too.

[KC-Krazo]

Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:

[Chiefster]

KC-Krazo wrote:
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, he is Marty.

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, he is Marty.

And if Marty is anything, he is predictable. He was not behind letting Brees go.

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
Marty couldn't have though up that insane move on his own.Or could he? :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well, he is Marty.

And if Marty is anything, he is predictable. He was not behind letting Brees go.

Exactly!

[Chiefster]

This is how the Pro Football Weekly has the order:

1. Broncos: 11-5

2. Chargers: 10-6

3. Chiefs: 10-6

4. Raiders: 6-10

This is how I know we'll take the division...(I hope) :pint:

[Guru]

3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Yeah; he's been definitely hitting the bong too hard.

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Yeah; he's been definitely hitting the bong too hard.

Nah, that is beyond stupid.... :roll:

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
3rd place? Behind the Chargers? Yeah right. What is that guy smokin?

Yeah; he's been definitely hitting the bong too hard.

Nah, that is beyond stupid.... :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

But... then again.... :-D :-D

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

But... then again.... :-D :-D

Ummmless filling??? :lol:

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!

But... then again.... :-D :-D

Ummmless filling??? :lol:


Kind of the opinion... Stupid.... America. At least sometimes.

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Agreed!


But... then again.... :-D :-D

Ummmless filling??? :lol:


Kind of the opinion... Stupid.... America. At least sometimes.

Who's the group activity leader here? We've gotten why off the beaten path. 8-)

[Guru]

I want to report a thread hijacking. http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/rules.gif

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:
I want to report a thread hijacking. http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/


What did the suspect/s look like???

[Guru]

If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll bet the resemblance to us would be purely coincidental.

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll bet the resemblance to us would be purely coincidental.

Why... whatevah do you mean? (in my best Doc Holiday - played by Val Kilmer)

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


Guru wrote:
If I could post a pic here, you know I would show ya. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll bet the resemblance to us would be purely coincidental.

Why... whatevah do you mean? (in my best Doc Holiday - played by Val Kilmer)

:lol:

I love that show. I gotta get to bed.


Nite Crowd!

[KC-Krazo]

That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

[Chiefster]

KC-Krazo wrote:
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Thats what I say. Herm outta hang it up in the locker room, bring it to their attention every single day and keep LJ running mad.

[KC-Krazo]

Mabey all those nicks and bruises wont be enough to keep um off the field if they are actually pissed! :-D :-D

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Thats what I say. Herm outta hang it up in the locker room, bring it to their attention every single day and keep LJ running mad.

Nah, just remind LJ that he will never make it in this league. 8-)

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:


KC-Krazo wrote:
That reporter must be Retarded.No way we finish Behind S.D chokers! But hey thats just fine fire up the K.C players by dissing them in the offseason!

Thats what I say. Herm outta hang it up in the locker room, bring it to their attention every single day and keep LJ running mad.

Nah, just remind LJ that he will never make it in this league. 8-)

:lol: :lol:

Yeah, keep tellin him that he needs to take the diapers off.

[KC-Krazo]

That sh*ts all smoke and mirrors. I been watchin L.J for years he always ran that way. His dad put that in him.I'm suprised HE isn't working for the chiefs.Seems like we constantly here about him. :roll: :roll:

[chief31]

Chiefs fan realist
K.C. 13-3 Den. 14-2
S.D. 8-8 K.C. 10-6
oAK. 6-10 Oak. 6-10
DEN. 0-16 S.D. 6-10

I'm kinda torn.

[Chiefster]

KC-Krazo wrote:
That sh*ts all smoke and mirrors. I been watchin L.J for years he always ran that way. His dad put that in him.I'm suprised HE isn't working for the chiefs.Seems like we constantly here about him. :roll: :roll:

Yeah; much of what we hear about NFL teams/players are smoke and mirrios.

[chief31]

Chiefs '06 season (revised)

5-11.

Larry Johnson - 1147 yds rushing

Trent Green -3 tds 8 ints (injured week four)

Looks like a very boring team now. The only play that I can see them gaining yards on is a dive up the middle for three yards.(we just became the Jets)

Excitement is now gone for me.

[Guru]

chief31 wrote:
Chiefs '06 season (revised)

5-11.

Larry Johnson - 1147 yds rushing

Trent Green -3 tds 8 ints (injured week four)

Looks like a very boring team now. The only play that I can see them gaining yards on is a dive up the middle for three yards.(we just became the Jets)

Excitement is now gone for me.

Lighten up Francis. It is day one.

[Chiefster]

While I'm very disapointed that Roaf is gone, I'm not ready to jump on the doom and gloom band wagon; I'm holding out some ray of hope.

[hyperlite]

The donks should be our main competition, but I question their QB play :-D. Another factor is their defensive losses.

Pick: 10-6

Sandyego will have problems early with new quarterback Rivers and their pass D will finall catch up with them.

Pick: 7-9

The Faiders will have problems in all areas. :hammer:

Pick 5-11

Chiefs: No need for reason

Pick 12-4

1. Chiefs
2. Donks
3. Sandyeggo
4. Faiders

IMHO

[Chiefster]

hyperlite wrote:
The donks should be our main competition, but I question their QB play :-D. Another factor is their defensive losses.

Pick: 10-6

Sandyego will have problems early with new quarterback Rivers and their pass D will finall catch up with them.

Pick: 7-9

The Faiders will have problems in all areas. :hammer:

Pick 5-11

Chiefs: No need for reason

Pick 12-4

1. Chiefs
2. Donks
3. Sandyeggo
4. Faiders

IMHO

Is this your non homer opinion? ;-)

[hyperlite]

It's more in between.

Actually, I'd think 11-5. Seriously.

Homer: 13-3

[chiefjon]

I think the donkeys will sneak the division title at like 12-4 chiefs 10-6 again bolts 8-8 if LT stays healthy and faiders 6-10!!!

[Old_admin]

Let's see.
Chiefs
Donks
Chargers
Raiders.

The Chiefs better step it up though. They have really been stinking it up in the preseason. Of course, last year the Colts were 0-5 in pre-season. They almost went undefeated.

[chief31]

I have no problem with the Chiefs losing ALL of their pre-season games. I have a problem with their inability to move the ball on offense.

First team, second team, no matter who is out there. The offense appears to be weak. The losses from the off-season have left us with a wet noodle of an offense.

Then, you look at the defense. There is no reason to expect a dramatic turnaround from last season's sub-par performance. The saying goes...."Rome wasn't built in a day." Well, it wasn't built in one off-season either. I expect an improvement on defense. But, I certainly don't expect a big enough improvement for the defense to carry a slow offense this season.

I have changed my view of this season. I now see my Chiefs as a team that is rebuilding. I hate that, but I can't find a reason to believe otherwise. Also, next off-season promises to bring us another rebuilding season in '07.

I will watch my beloved team with alot of hope and passion. However, 5-11 will not baffle me.

[Chiefster]

chief31 wrote:
I have no problem with the Chiefs losing ALL of their pre-season games. I have a problem with their inability to move the ball on offense.

First team, second team, no matter who is out there. The offense appears to be weak. The losses from the off-season have left us with a wet noodle of an offense.

Then, you look at the defense. There is no reason to expect a dramatic turnaround from last season's sub-par performance. The saying goes...."Rome wasn't built in a day." Well, it wasn't built in one off-season either. I expect an improvement on defense. But, I certainly don't expect a big enough improvement for the defense to carry a slow offense this season.

I have changed my view of this season. I now see my Chiefs as a team that is rebuilding. I hate that, but I can't find a reason to believe otherwise. Also, next off-season promises to bring us another rebuilding season in '07.

I will watch my beloved team with alot of hope and passion. However, 5-11 will not baffle me.

I will go into this season with no expectations; that way there are no surprises unless they are pleasant ones. Thanks for the observations. Good post! :-)

[Guru]

Chiefster wrote:

I will go into this season with no expectations; that way there are no surprises unless they are pleasant ones. Thanks for the observations. Good post! :-)

Liar!!!! ;-)

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:


Chiefster wrote:

I will go into this season with no expectations; that way there are no surprises unless they are pleasant ones. Thanks for the observations. Good post! :-)

Liar!!!! ;-)
:lol:
Hey, I'll have you know that I'm sitting up. 8-)

[chief31]

Well, I guess I overestimated our offensive tackles. I had expected Greens injury in week four. And, we didn't become the jets, we became the Texans.

[Chiefster]

Bump.

[Guru]

1. San Diego
2. Denver
3. KC
4. Oakland

feel free to reverse 3 and 4 if you choose. I can't bring myself to do it.

[Chiefster]

Guru wrote:
1. San Diego
2. Denver
3. KC
4. Oakland

feel free to reverse 3 and 4 if you choose. I can't bring myself to do it.

Same here. :-(