PDA

View Full Version : Lets all take a breather...



Rodgers4MVP
09-06-2009, 12:07 PM
There has been a lot of screaming about whats going on.
And half of these people don't know football

1.Haley doesn't trade players l,Pioli does so shut up about Haley being stupid.

2.Pollard being cut...To be able to sign people(like O-linemen)we have to have room on our roster,We can't sign people of we have 75 players already(is that what roster cuts are at now?idk).And I think Pollard was a ticking time bomb.That guy was going to kill our team in TC.

3.We have 4 QB's for a reason

Posibility 1.Thigpen is fighting for a 3rd string spot with Guirrtuiz(LOL)

Most likely Posibility 2.Thigpen is getting traded because he sucks hairy beep.


I'm trying to explain football to people who don't care about reasons,Gonzalez was a great trade to me srry :p

jmlamerson
09-06-2009, 12:13 PM
Tell you what, why don't you stop posting stupidities like:

"We should just just end our team out of embarrassment"

"Lol honestly,if we don't adress the O-line and Speical teams next year..I will never say Chiefs again,I'll say garbage"

"And Honestly I won't be to attached to the chiefs games since there really isn't a great chance of us going anywhere,I'll just watch a more interesting game,not the chiefs in Dec. Without a win"

And every other negative trollish thing you've been posting over the past week.

Rodgers4MVP
09-06-2009, 12:17 PM
I'm srry I'm tired of watching us lose and lose and lose a d lose game after game.Dont tell me ur not getting kind of tired of it

Rodgers4MVP
09-06-2009, 12:18 PM
You kept them!I'll put them in my sig!haha

matthewschiefs
09-06-2009, 12:46 PM
There has been a lot of screaming about whats going on.
And half of these people don't know football

1.Haley doesn't trade players l,Pioli does so shut up about Haley being stupid.

2.Pollard being cut...To be able to sign people(like O-linemen)we have to have room on our roster,We can't sign people of we have 75 players already(is that what roster cuts are at now?idk).And I think Pollard was a ticking time bomb.That guy was going to kill our team in TC.

3.We have 4 QB's for a reason

Posibility 1.Thigpen is fighting for a 3rd string spot with Guirrtuiz(LOL)

Most likely Posibility 2.Thigpen is getting traded because he sucks hairy beep.


I'm trying to explain football to people who don't care about reasons,Gonzalez was a great trade to me srry :p

Well i agree with you on one thing Pioli is that one that works out the trades and not hailey. Now he and Hailey talk about the trade and they work together on the roster. as for pollard i dont see the move realy working for the fact that i dont no that mike brown might not just get hurt again. thats why the bears let him go. I dont see how getting a o lineman that was rejected by anther team helps more then haveing pollard but maybe pioli has something in mind so i will just wait and see.

Rodgers4MVP
09-06-2009, 02:01 PM
Mathew it's like have Cassel and Brady after a season...you can't affird and don't need both.

matthewschiefs
09-06-2009, 02:23 PM
Mathew it's like have Cassel and Brady after a season...you can't affird and don't need both.

If Brown can stay healty no the chiefs dont NEED both. But if brown goes down again as he has a history of doing then not haveing pollard there to fill in will hurt IMO.

northwest
09-06-2009, 02:34 PM
i love the chiefs. in fact, right at this moment, i love the chiefs more than i ever have.

Big Daddy Tek
09-06-2009, 04:50 PM
There has been a lot of screaming about whats going on.
And half of these people don't know football

1.Haley doesn't trade players l,Pioli does so shut up about Haley being stupid.

2.Pollard being cut...To be able to sign people(like O-linemen)we have to have room on our roster,We can't sign people of we have 75 players already(is that what roster cuts are at now?idk).And I think Pollard was a ticking time bomb.That guy was going to kill our team in TC.

3.We have 4 QB's for a reason

Posibility 1.Thigpen is fighting for a 3rd string spot with Guirrtuiz(LOL)

Most likely Posibility 2.Thigpen is getting traded because he sucks hairy beep.


I'm trying to explain football to people who don't care about reasons,Gonzalez was a great trade to me srry :p

There are alot of people on this site, including me, that would run circles around you with football knowledge. I was not completly crushed over the Pollard trade either, but explaining it as "we had to get rid of somebody to sign other guys" is an awful explanation. Especially for a guy who knows so much about football like yourself. Lol.

Also, Nobody in the world, except you would say that the Gonzo trade was a "great trade." People who actually know football would say that "it was a trade that eventually had to get done" or "times have changed and its time to move forward" or even "atleast we received a second rounder, which was much more than the market had for him." Saying that trading away the greatest TE of all time after a 90+ catch season was a "great trade" doesn't sound like the expert that you are portraying yourself as.

Last but not least, I love your expert opinion of Thigpen. How is he analized by the great RodgersMVP: "He sucks hairy beep." Nice job man!

Oh yeah, one more thing. This is how you spell our reserve quarterbacks last name: Gutierrez, NOT "Guirrtuiz." Im sure just a minor mistake for an expert like you.

stricken721
09-06-2009, 10:10 PM
i love the chiefs. in fact, right at this moment, i love the chiefs more than i ever have.

Rep.

buttabean58
09-06-2009, 10:24 PM
I would have to agree with Tek on this one, I know just a bit about football and I can only stand in your shadow (Rodgers4mvp). But with your vast knowledge about letting 88 go was a good thing can you please explain why this was such a good trade? I mean we did bring in a QB that had Moss, Welker to throw to and a solid o-line to stand behind. The only solid thing we had last yr was 88, and it would have helped Cassel to have a solid playmaker there. So again why was this such a good trade?

Bike
09-06-2009, 10:43 PM
We get a 2nd round pick for TG...
Pats get a 1st rd pick for Seymour.
Who wins?
And before you go dribbling, I understand that the Pats won't get their pick until 2011, but I kinda think that pick will be traded before then...
Belichick still on top of his game. Now for Piolis' next move...

jmlamerson
09-06-2009, 10:51 PM
We get a 2nd round pick for TG...
Pats get a 1st rd pick for Seymour.
Who wins?
And before you go dribbling, I understand that the Pats won't get their pick until 2011, but I kinda think that pick will be traded before then...
Belichick still on top of his game. Now for Piolis' next move...


Come on. A top flight DE is worth a whole lot more than a TE, even the best TE. Especially given the 5-year age difference. We got the best possible deal we could get for TG. That isn't the same thing as saying we should have traded him, though.

Chiefster
09-06-2009, 10:51 PM
I love this thread; it's at the hilarious stage just right before it implodes and I have to close it. :lol:

Bike
09-06-2009, 10:56 PM
Come on. A top flight DE is worth a whole lot more than a TE, even the best TE. Especially given the 5-year age difference. We got the best possible deal we could get for TG. That isn't the same thing as saying we should have traded him, though.
A lot more? Are you sure about that?
It don't matter. Whats done is done.
I do believe that TG will contribute a helluva lot more to the Falcons this year than Seymour will for the Raiders...

Big Daddy Tek
09-06-2009, 11:02 PM
Come on. A top flight DE is worth a whole lot more than a TE, even the best TE. Especially given the 5-year age difference. We got the best possible deal we could get for TG. That isn't the same thing as saying we should have traded him, though.

Whether or not we should have traded him can be debated (with him wanting out, Haleys use of TE's ect.). Saying it was a "great trade" is just funny. Unless your a Falcons fan of coarse. Than it might just be that.

Bike
09-06-2009, 11:05 PM
I love this thread; it's at the hilarious stage just right before it implodes and I have to close it. :lol:
Be nice!!!:lol:

Big Daddy Tek
09-06-2009, 11:06 PM
A lot more? Are you sure about that?
It don't matter. Whats done is done.
I do believe that TG will contribute a helluva lot more to the Falcons this year than Seymour will for the Raiders...

Yeah I agree with JM that a DE is much more valuable than a TE, but your right as far as production, especially since Seymour has been a 3-4 DE his entire career and the Raiders will use him as either a 4-3 DE or DT. The chances of him changing his scheme completly and being as effective is very small.

jmlamerson
09-06-2009, 11:08 PM
A lot more? Are you sure about that?
It don't matter. Whats done is done.
I do believe that TG will contribute a helluva lot more to the Falcons this year than Seymour will for the Raiders...

Yeah, I'm sure. I love TG, but if my choice were him in his prime vs. JA in his prime back on the team, I wouldn't even hesitate.

And I disagree with you about Seymour v. TG this season. TG will provide a great weapon for Ryan, but Seymour will provide instant legitimacy to the Raiders DL.

jmlamerson
09-06-2009, 11:09 PM
Yeah I agree with JM that a DE is much more valuable than a TE, but your right as far as production, especially since Seymour has been a 3-4 DE his entire career and the Raiders will use him as either a 4-3 DE or DT. The chances of him changing his scheme completly and being as effective is very small.

Just a quick FYI, Seymour was a 4-3 DT his first season with the Pats in 2001, their first SB season.

buttabean58
09-06-2009, 11:10 PM
Seymour will provide instant legitimacy to the Raiders DL.

But its the raiders and they will find a way to screw it up.

Chiefster
09-06-2009, 11:11 PM
Be nice!!!:lol:

Oh come on, that's no fun. :D

Bike
09-06-2009, 11:12 PM
Yeah I agree with JM that a DE is much more valuable than a TE, but your right as far as production, especially since Seymour has been a 3-4 DE his entire career and the Raiders will use him as either a 4-3 DE or DT. The chances of him changing his scheme completly and being as effective is very small.
Well remember Seymour went to the pro Bowl as a 4-3 DT also...

Big Daddy Tek
09-06-2009, 11:25 PM
Just a quick FYI, Seymour was a 4-3 DT his first season with the Pats in 2001, their first SB season.

Good call. Many people would say that Seymour's rookie season was forgettable though. Not like it really matters almost a decade later.

Big Daddy Tek
09-06-2009, 11:27 PM
Well remember Seymour went to the pro Bowl as a 4-3 DT also...

When?

Big Daddy Tek
09-06-2009, 11:29 PM
Seymour will provide instant legitimacy to the Raiders DL.

But its the raiders and they will find a way to screw it up.

Did you just cut and paste JM's quote? LOL

josh1971
09-07-2009, 12:34 AM
Hey, the original "expert" poster seems to have vanished.

jmlamerson
09-07-2009, 01:41 AM
Hey, the original "expert" poster seems to have vanished.

We're richer for having lost him.

matthewschiefs
09-07-2009, 11:32 AM
Hey, the original "expert" poster seems to have vanished.

I kond of miss him already need someone here to make me look smart :lol:

josh1971
09-08-2009, 09:21 PM
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ who cares its the raiders


And who can argue with that?

Chiefster
09-08-2009, 10:03 PM
And who can argue with that?

Would it do any good? :D