Everyone played well agains the Chiefs back then, except for J. Russel and he still didn't look bad.
in 2010? we won 10 games that year (against belowe .500 teams, and that was the year oakland went 6-10 and their only wins were in the afc west, KC went 2-4 that year in the afc west)
10-23-2013, 05:52 PM
Eydugstr
Quote:
Originally Posted by brdempsey69
Don't underestimate Campbell. He played very well for the Raiders against the Chiefs in 2010 in both games.
That very well could be the reason why Campbell got the job this Sunday. Teams are really struggling to find anything to win against our D.
IMHO they traded off their best shot against our D...Terry Richardson. Dumb move.
10-23-2013, 07:09 PM
doobs_05
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eydugstr
That very well could be the reason why Campbell got the job this Sunday. Teams are really struggling to find anything to win against our D.
IMHO they traded off their best shot against our D...Terry Richardson. Dumb move.
Trent Richardson wasn't that great any ways, colts spent too much for him
10-23-2013, 08:00 PM
matthewschiefs
Quote:
Originally Posted by doobs_05
Trent Richardson wasn't that great any ways, colts spent too much for him
Yes they did Never understood all the hype for him. He hadn't proven much
10-24-2013, 01:10 PM
chiefnut
Quote:
Originally Posted by doobs_05
HUH?
If you're talking about the 28-0 win.......Boller was the qb, then palmer came in, campbell beat KC both times in 2010, 2011 didn't play because he was injured
you are absolutely correct, I stand corrected, anyway cambell is out and wheden is back in, maybe they will pick up boller to play.