Quite the contrary, it's you who's not getting it. As evidenced by your statement of preferring Romo over Flacco. You can regurgitate all the dog doo-doo you want regarding stats, but it really doesn't support your argument at all.
And, as has been pointed out before, what would the Ravens record be without him? It's not like they haven't had some turnover in personnel since he came to the Ravens in 2008 -- they have.
Quite correct. It is hilarious watching you post stats to support your argument & pulling things out of your arse that are totally irrelevant.
LOL, what a copout there. It was mentioned first & foremost about playoff wins being more important than the passing stats. And Flacco's passing stats have been pretty good, as well.
Think whatever you want to. My analysis still stands.
Just another People's Exhibit of you pulling something out of your arse, as mentioned above. TexasChief and I were referring to the preference of Romo vs Flacco and only that.
Quite the contrary. TexasChief and I do know how to look at QB's objectively and look at the bigger overall picture regarding QB's. You, on the other hand, have proven that the only thing you are willing to look at is passing stats, as evidenced by your statement that you would prefer Romo over Flacco because of passing stats, which anybody possessing any common sense and logic, can see is just plain short-sighted.