Seattle Seahawks, Zach Miller agree to contract, source says - ESPN
Losing aso and now miller. Maybe now all these raider trolls on espn won't be around to talk crap anymore about how this is this year.
Imma miss al davis when he's gone
guess they don't want to win!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by #58ChiefsFan
Yep me too, We should vote him into the Hall Of Fame, He is the best player on the chiefs team.:D
Nmandi and Miller are huge losses. Especially, Nmandi. But the D-line that MANHANDLED the Chief's O-line is still intact. As they say, the games are won in the trenches.
How do you feel about your off season? It might just me being a faider hating Chiefs fan but I think you have taken a step back. Firing a coach that seemed to have you going in a good direction. Losing your best playing in Nmandi and now losing on of your guys in your passing game. Just seems like a step back to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoda
Well, I will be honest and not a "homer". Cable firing may not be as bad as first thought. The O vastly improved under Hue Jackson, Cable was a firey coach that help the team believe. But Hue has that fire too and the smarts to bring the O to the next level. Coaching wise, the team may be on better hands.
Miller's is a big blow, but there are tight ends on the team ready to take his place and Reece makes a match up problems.
The one that hurts the most is Nmandi, no doubt more than his physical skills, his knowledge and leadership skills will be missed. But the Raiders have a long history of developing all pro CB. The last time we went through this, the Raiders was the transition from C Wood to Nmandi. The Raider nation is hoping for the same from Nmandi to Rout.
Has far as the season, my biggest concern is the OL, it will make or break the season. The Raiders could either win the west or go 8-8 or 7-8. In all honesty, aside from broncos, the West is a toss up.
I think everyone but the broncos knows they are not a factor in anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoda
I have to agree the west is a toss up. The Broncos are going to take a beating this year. The bolts have one more good year left in them IMO. It will just depend on if they can limit there bad start they almost always have. You guys it will all depend on how your team adjust to the changes. You never know how that is going to go. We have to learn to win games late. We lost a number of games that we should have won last year because we couldn't finish. We had our chances in the first game against you guys but couldn't get the job done. It should be real exciting to see how it plays out in the AFC West this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoda
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewschiefs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoda
Hey, I apologize in advance if I sound like a d!ck. Everybody (including myself) makes typological errors from time to time (See "Chifs move Lilja from RG to LG"), but reading your posts is making my head hurt! 15 errors in 3 posts! All I ask is that you proofread what you posted before you hit "submit reply," like I should always do. And if you don't know the difference between their, there and they're, to, too, and two, weather and whether, no, know and now, and which and witch, maybe you should research those words before you post. I learned these words in 3rd grade. You should know them by now.Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewschiefs
Apology accepted. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by TopekaRoy
Why are you saying sorry if you already no? :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by TopekaRoy
Couldn't resist. I agree with your statement a LOT, the one for me is people saying no when they mean know. If you knew I wouldn't have to tell you no! No is negative, know means you knew better. :lol:
As for the post, it's like the Faiders are intentionally trying to deal off every single good player they have. All must really want that 0-16 season. If so here's to hoping Andrew Luck is the next Jamarcus.
Faiders suck, Al davis is old, ditto, ditto... go chiefs
Yeah those "typological" errors are the worst. :D
Dude, you're my hero... :bananen_smilies046:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefster
OopsQuote:
Originally Posted by Chiefster
http://media.myspacepimper.com/conte...smiles_410.gif
You know, I was thinking "typographical" as I typed that. I don't have any idea how that happened. Not there there aren't occasional logical errors in this forum as well. LOL.
We all make mistakes, Sorry if I made too big a deal about it. I was drinking and posting and, well, you know...
You won't catch me doing that!! :bananen_smilies046: :drunkhb:Quote:
Originally Posted by TopekaRoy
I do what I can. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by josh1971
Ain't no thing dude. Actually "typological" is an actual word with a meaning closely related to the study of grammar. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by TopekaRoy
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/typology
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada
:lol: No not you!
I thought it had more to do with the study of fonts! You know, your Helvetica bold, Sans Serifs and what not!Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefster
You could be right; I was thinking that it also had to do with the proper placements of literary symbols and characters, but we digress.Quote:
Originally Posted by TopekaRoy
I'm not! That's just me joking around again. Your definition is correct. I was talking about "typography." But it sounded good!Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefster
Ah, I see. You have proven that your intelligence does indeed exceed my own, but then again that isn't saying much. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by TopekaRoy