...and if anyone is dumb enough not to it is those early 20's millionaires.:bananen_smilies046:
Printable View
It was not that much of an exaggeration!
Chicago would not have scored any offensive points (including the field goals) because their offense was just barely able to beat our D without Jared. With Jared I give us the win.
Houston's offense would have been stymied, but we still probably would have lost with that terrible offensive performance of our own.
So at least 3-1.
But you can't count out the play of just one person helping out an entire team.
We would have run over the Colts D last year in the playoffs if it wasn't for that one guy on their defense (can't remember his name) that returned after injury.
So 4-0 is not a big stretch in my opinion!
Boob Sanders
I just think if our two losses or two wins ,however you like at it are only because we have jared allen then let s get rid of the rest of the team. right? all we need is him. ??
No they play the game as a team. If your team isnt good enough to win even after losing a guy or to ,to injuries or what have ya....or a bad call here or there then youre not a good enough team to deserve the win.
Our D did good in both looses, its our offense that didnt do squat! I think JA is a hero but cant blame a win or loss on him.:drunkhb:
What if JA didn't strip the ball and SD goes and scores?
It's a tie game, up for grabs!
Could go either way but there are big time players that change games, if you don't know that then you are not watching the NFL, dude!
I am not giving the wins exclusively to JA but he is THE BIGGEST play maker on defense.
His presence was sorely felt!