cheifs laid down?

Printable View

12-14-2010, 01:59 PM
jacko58

cheifs laid down?

from the moment the chiefs vs broncos was over i felt that the chargers game was not ours to win. then cassel was announced out and i threw up alittle bit. god i hate croyle. Anyways i felt all week that were just not motivated to go to san diego and play full hearted. It kinda felt like a week off to me. Which looking at it and Todd Haleys reaction to the game could be how the chiefs felt. Thomas Jones our work horse had 3 carries. Our offensive play calling was blah (about as bad as these damn reffs). It just seemed like with a 2 game lead in the division we decided to play vanilla then let our play do our talking these final three games. Not the way I'd wanna start the final quarter at the same time. Now cassels rested. thomas jones rested. people are gonna stop talking about bowe. I wasn't to upset with our ds play in that game except on third down. I mean look what they had forward to watching when they gave the ball back to the offense?? I'm excited for this week against the rams i feel like it was plained to lay down to the chargless and let everyone forget about us alittle. Thats what we had goin for us no one talked about us. Cool down the talk about cassel our rushing attack passing attack and then catch fire the final three weeks. Brillant or just me drinking to much kolaid. What yall think

good day chief fans
12-14-2010, 02:37 PM
wilqb16

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacko58

from the moment the chiefs vs broncos was over i felt that the chargers game was not ours to win. then cassel was announced out and i threw up alittle bit. god i hate croyle. Anyways i felt all week that were just not motivated to go to san diego and play full hearted. It kinda felt like a week off to me. Which looking at it and Todd Haleys reaction to the game could be how the chiefs felt. Thomas Jones our work horse had 3 carries. Our offensive play calling was blah (about as bad as these damn reffs). It just seemed like with a 2 game lead in the division we decided to play vanilla then let our play do our talking these final three games. Not the way I'd wanna start the final quarter at the same time. Now cassels rested. thomas jones rested. people are gonna stop talking about bowe. I wasn't to upset with our ds play in that game except on third down. I mean look what they had forward to watching when they gave the ball back to the offense?? I'm excited for this week against the rams i feel like it was plained to lay down to the chargless and let everyone forget about us alittle. Thats what we had goin for us no one talked about us. Cool down the talk about cassel our rushing attack passing attack and then catch fire the final three weeks. Brillant or just me drinking to much kolaid. What yall think

good day chief fans

I don't think the Chiefs laid down on purpose at all...that doesn't make any sense. I think the fact that Jones had 3 carries is more representative of how badly Weis was trying to jump start the offense. My take is the more we feel we need Charles, the more we use him...

I do think that the game got away from us quickly and that the staff didn't have enough confidence in Croyle to open it up and really try to get back into it. In that sense it was damage control by the coaching staff, in that they believed that opening it up would make things worse...

On defense, I am not surprised we had troubles because our defense is generally not good enough to stop teams, if the offense doesn't at least control the clock. In the Denver win, although we scored only 10 points, the offense moved the ball well and the D wasn't constantly on the field. Too many three and outs really hurt us...
12-14-2010, 03:35 PM
4everchiefsfan25

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacko58

from the moment the chiefs vs broncos was over i felt that the chargers game was not ours to win. then cassel was announced out and i threw up alittle bit. god i hate croyle. Anyways i felt all week that were just not motivated to go to san diego and play full hearted. It kinda felt like a week off to me. Which looking at it and Todd Haleys reaction to the game could be how the chiefs felt. Thomas Jones our work horse had 3 carries. Our offensive play calling was blah (about as bad as these damn reffs). It just seemed like with a 2 game lead in the division we decided to play vanilla then let our play do our talking these final three games. Not the way I'd wanna start the final quarter at the same time. Now cassels rested. thomas jones rested. people are gonna stop talking about bowe. I wasn't to upset with our ds play in that game except on third down. I mean look what they had forward to watching when they gave the ball back to the offense?? I'm excited for this week against the rams i feel like it was plained to lay down to the chargless and let everyone forget about us alittle. Thats what we had goin for us no one talked about us. Cool down the talk about cassel our rushing attack passing attack and then catch fire the final three weeks. Brillant or just me drinking to much kolaid. What yall think

good day chief fans

Your drinking too much Kool-aid Todd Haley would feel much better about our playoff birth if we had a 3 game lead over Oakland with just 3 games left and the Chargers were knocked out of the playoffs Sunday. We just got physically beat by the Chargers and you could tell they needed that game a lot more than the Chiefs.
12-14-2010, 04:12 PM
matthewschiefs

I don't think there is any way that we wanted to planned on or tried to lose that football game. It would do us no good to lose that game as loseing a game NEVER helps you. It just doesn't make sense that we were out trying to lose that football game.
12-14-2010, 05:09 PM
Chief4Ever&Ever

Of coarse it doesn't make sense to lose on purpose. They were not prepared at all for the game! It was a very lack luster performance by our offense. The coaches did not do anything to prepare our offense for the game.

The D did what they could against the no.1 ranked offense. Croyle sucks! They knew they could not depend on him (wonder why he is on the team), to have less than 200 total yards in a game is pathetic, to have less than 100 is a discrace to any organization!

We are all pissed about the way our team played, and looked to me that they laid down and died! I blame it on the coaching staff! Horrible performance!
12-14-2010, 05:32 PM
matthewschiefs

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief4Ever&Ever

Of coarse it doesn't make sense to lose on purpose. They were not prepared at all for the game! It was a very lack luster performance by our offense. The coaches did not do anything to prepare our offense for the game.

The D did what they could against the no.1 ranked offense. Croyle sucks! They knew they could not depend on him (wonder why he is on the team), to have less than 200 total yards in a game is pathetic, to have less than 100 is a discrace to any organization!

We are all pissed about the way our team played, and looked to me that they laid down and died! I blame it on the coaching staff! Horrible performance!

The coaching staff is to blame for me as well. Not one coach but ALL OF THEM. When you get beat down like that the coaches did not have the team ready to play. They didn't and a the target of much deserved blame this week.
12-14-2010, 06:30 PM
Chiefster

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBeUGqeYsQg"]YouTube - Kool-Aid commercial[/ame]
12-14-2010, 08:50 PM
Pro_Angler

It's hard to game plan with 2 days practice. Until Wed. afternoon they had a plan then it all changed when Matt wasnt there. That gave then 2 day's to re game plan.
12-14-2010, 09:05 PM
tornadospotter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pro_Angler

It's hard to game plan with 2 days practice. Until Wed. afternoon they had a plan then it all changed when Matt wasnt there. That gave then 2 day's to re game plan.

I do not buy into that, if that is the case, it would not matter who was QB, we would have loss anyway. I do believe, they changed the plan to a more conservative play calling. When instead they should have gone with new game plan, and more play action pass first, then run. We should have come out passing first. That may have caused more of a change to the dolts thinking. Instead we came out running, and running, and running. Then punting. They did not change the game plan, they just restricted it more. They should have changed the game plan.
12-14-2010, 11:00 PM
josh1971

Quote:

Originally Posted by matthewschiefs

I don't think there is any way that we wanted to planned on or tried to lose that football game. It would do us no good to lose that game as loseing a game NEVER helps you. It just doesn't make sense that we were out trying to lose that football game.

Theees!
12-15-2010, 11:55 PM
2010chiefs

I agree 100% with Tornado!
12-16-2010, 09:25 AM
Chief4Ever&Ever

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfan1982

Get over it ppl! We are 8-5! Dont be one of those ppl that praise only when things are good, then go polar opposite to hating on some great coaches just because we got our butts kicked to one of the best offenses in the NFL!

We were not going to win that game in San Diego...with this team. We are still suppose to be in the rebuilding stage. Next year was suppose to be our big year...not this year...yet, it is turning out that we could make the playoffs this year!

Stop hating on the coaches and the team! We were not meant to win that game. We are gonna make the playoffs still. All is good! SMILE!!! Sunday is on the way. Rams are in trouble! 49ers are still planning on winning their division and their victory over the Chargers is going to help their cause!

This is not one of those games you can let go because we have a winning record. We had less than 70 yards of total offense, that is pathetic and should never happen!

As far as "not" going to win the game in san diego. Any team can win on any given day! That's why they play the game. We are in first place in the division, we had already beat the chargers, and we could have done it! A true chiefs fan would never say what you just said! Give me a break!

Who else would you blame for a horrilbe game plan? Our team had more punts than first downs! It was the coaches fault, that is their job, they get paid millions to have their team ready every single game! Our team was uninspired, and played like a group of cheerleaders, and it starts with the coaches!
You can't just let go of the worst performance in Chiefs history!:sign0104:

Now that I got that out of the way, GO CHIEFS! Kill the Rams!
12-16-2010, 09:54 AM
kcvet

no matter what they have to put this disaster behind em now and take care of business these last 3 games.

maybe we can get some help from the 49er's tonite???

I was hoping we could win and let Croyle play vs Rams. but..........

I just love it when a well concevied plan goes ta He** in a hand basket

Cassel is working out now. so maybe....a new hand basket????
12-16-2010, 10:30 AM
Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcvet

no matter what they have to put this disaster behind em now and take care of business these last 3 games.

maybe we can get some help from the 49er's tonite???

I was hoping we could win and let Croyle play vs Rams. but..........

I just love it when a well concevied plan goes ta He** in a hand basket

Cassel is working out now. so maybe....a new hand basket????

Cassel will play. My friends brother works security near the stadium and he heard if from a waterboy who was eating at Taco Bell. He will play.
12-16-2010, 10:31 AM
Canada

...and Chiefs is misspelled in the title of this thread.
12-16-2010, 10:35 AM
kcvet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canada

Cassel will play. My friends brother works security near the stadium and he heard if from a waterboy who was eating at Taco Bell. He will play.

some good news we can use :chiefs:
12-16-2010, 10:37 AM
Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcvet

some good news we can use :chiefs:

I could tell you my real source, but then I'd have to "silence" you!!
12-16-2010, 10:40 AM
kcvet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canada

I could tell you my real source, but then I'd have to "silence" you!!

ok achmed

http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/im...2010/12/30.jpg
12-16-2010, 11:11 AM
4everchiefsfan25

Quote:

Originally Posted by tornadospotter

I do not buy into that, if that is the case, it would not matter who was QB, we would have loss anyway. I do believe, they changed the plan to a more conservative play calling. When instead they should have gone with new game plan, and more play action pass first, then run. We should have come out passing first. That may have caused more of a change to the dolts thinking. Instead we came out running, and running, and running. Then punting. They did not change the game plan, they just restricted it more. They should have changed the game plan.

IMO Todd Haley has "out smarted" himself on game planning or play calling during the season like going for it on 4th and 1 and not running the ball when Oakland wasnt able to stop us. I think the reason why Haley didn't want to change the game plan so much was because he didn't want to get crushed by the media talking about how he outsmarted himself again and again, but I mean its easy for all of us to say he should passed more after watching the game but I mean if he would of thrown the ball a lot and Brodie threw a couple INTs I think we would be sitting here saying we have the number 1 rushing offense why wernt we running the ball.
12-16-2010, 05:27 PM
Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4everchiefsfan25

IMO Todd Haley has "out smarted" himself on game planning or play calling during the season like going for it on 4th and 1 and not running the ball when Oakland wasnt able to stop us. I think the reason why Haley didn't want to change the game plan so much was because he didn't want to get crushed by the media talking about how he outsmarted himself again and again, but I mean its easy for all of us to say he should passed more after watching the game but I mean if he would of thrown the ball a lot and Brodie threw a couple INTs I think we would be sitting here saying we have the number 1 rushing offense why wernt we running the ball.

I remember at one point, an announcer asked why "they weren't throwing on first down then Brodie dropped back and took a 12 yard sack. Thats why the other commentator said. By that point in the game I kinda had to laugh.
12-16-2010, 09:12 PM
wilqb16

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4everchiefsfan25

IMO Todd Haley has "out smarted" himself on game planning or play calling during the season like going for it on 4th and 1 and not running the ball when Oakland wasnt able to stop us. I think the reason why Haley didn't want to change the game plan so much was because he didn't want to get crushed by the media talking about how he outsmarted himself again and again, but I mean its easy for all of us to say he should passed more after watching the game but I mean if he would of thrown the ball a lot and Brodie threw a couple INTs I think we would be sitting here saying we have the number 1 rushing offense why wernt we running the ball.

I agree with all of this, except the part about Haley caring about the media...I really look at Haley as the type of guy who does what he thinks is right and could give a rats butt about what anyone thinks...