2013 NFL Draft Tracker – NFL.com
4th best prospect according to the NFL.com draft grade? Nonsense! ChiefsCrowd told me that Geno is a late first round pick with no business in the top 5!
Geno Smith Draft Profile – NFL.com
Printable View
2013 NFL Draft Tracker – NFL.com
4th best prospect according to the NFL.com draft grade? Nonsense! ChiefsCrowd told me that Geno is a late first round pick with no business in the top 5!
Geno Smith Draft Profile – NFL.com
There's a Drew Bledsoe in this draft...What's so special about Bledsoe? 98-95 career record, 77.1 QB Rating, 57.2% completion percentage and a 251:206 TD:INT ratio. 4 playoff appearances in 14 years.
Sounds like Matt Cassel if you ask me. I guarantee you there is a Drew Bledsoe in this draft.
CBS says he is 11
Scout inc on ESPN says he is 23
SB Nation says he is 16
So most have him a reach at #1
If they think Geno is worth the #1 pick, you might as well sit back and relax because this regime will prove to be just as incompetent as the previous one.
Lastly, a lot of teams play it safe and take the best player available and snag a LT. LTs never turn teams into instant contenders. That's why if Geno is the best QB in the Chiefs minds, he'll weigh heavier b/c of positional importance. Every single GM ever will tell you they draft the best player available. It's partially true AFTER you factor in the weights they put on each position.
If you truly live and die by the "BPA" attitude, then you'll never get a QB b/c they're always overdrafted due to extra weight put on the position.
Not at all. But once you use your first pick on a LT, the team is no better than last year.
Of course they're going to add more talent in rounds 2-7. But drafting a LT at #1 overall is not adding any wins, no matter how you swing it.
So what's more important, take the best player or make the team better?