For every honor roll there is a group of teams that didn't advance with its performance. Take a look at the 2009 grade sheet, beginning with four "A" performers and ending with two "F."
More...
Printable View
For every honor roll there is a group of teams that didn't advance with its performance. Take a look at the 2009 grade sheet, beginning with four "A" performers and ending with two "F."
More...
:11: 22 teams graded out better than us. I'm still going to be positive and beleive in Pioli and Haley. They have to know what they are doing. Although I did take note that the PATS kept rolling along.
:bananen_smilies046: :drunkhb: fingers and toes crossed.:lol:
What is this crap? Denver gets an A?
Just hours ago the were ragging on them for picking up a back in the first round. I believe it was Moreno from Georgia.
Yeah the experts also did well with their Mocks as well. :D
Ahh, ESPN and count chocula's(Mel Kiper) grades eh?:bananen_smilies046:
Pay no attention to the pundit behind the curtain
Any expert who grades the Broncos an A- is not worth paying attention to. The Broncos had a worse draft than the Raiders. At least the Raiders drafted to their needs and didn't waste any 2010 picks.
really dumb to grade a draft this early...
I like jackson, 18 sacks and hes a 3-4 DE, they arent sack guys typically, and mcgee, was the 2nd best 5 tech, so...two bookends, is a great start, add in cassel/vrabel....and hope to hit on the speed/athletic washington/Mcneese State WR who unfortunately took robinsons old number...both of those guys could boom...especially washington, he has insane intangibles.