Do I really need to go over why I think he's bad? 50% completion, QBR of barely over 60 for his career, more picks than TDs, and a whole lot of injuries. He's Brody Croyle with a different name.
At ND he was 29-17. That's a horrible record. Here's my problem(I ask Catholics to set aside preconceived notions here) with Quinn: He failed at Notre Dame and they blamed the coaches instead of Quinn. He failed at Cleveland and they blamed the coach(Crennel) instead of Quinn. He failed at Denver and now too many people want to blame the coaches. He is a rotten QB and while he had a winning record at ND, not even close to a top 25 team. Now let the excuses start. I find it funny how the same guys trashing a very WINNING Matt Cassel are up in arms defending the LOSING Brady Quinn. Methinks I smell a Catholic bias.
This is only to have an upgrade should an injury occur to Cassel and it is exactly that an upgrade over Palko...if he ever had to step in he could be okay with weapons that he will have in KC.:beat_DeadHorse:
i dont think Quinn will, but like Sick Dog said, better than Palko.
Amazing. I think everyone and their mother knows how u feel about matt cassel is that all u have to bring....we are only good because of herms talent....and the pioli is a bum....what are u gonna do when we are in the afc championship with matt cassel will u shut the eff up.....Quote:
Originally Posted by My Man Orton;257301[/INDENT