He's not talking the super bowl, he's talking about the NFL in general, if you think Denver (or any team) has an advantage every game, every year and the fix is in, why do you watch?
Printable View
One major difference that you failed to point out. The Chiefs were coming off a 2-14 record in 2012. The Donkeys were coming off a 13-3 record going into '97, a 12-4 record going into '98, and a 13-3 record going into 2013 <---- that's the difference and that renders your argument completely invalid. Even back in '97, the Chiefs had a tougher schedule coming coming off a 9-7 season than the Donkeys did.
And the Chiefs have never started any season 10-0 in their history, EVER. Get your facts straight.
I didn't say whether or not he was talking about the SB or NFL in general.
I never said "every game, every year". I fact I not only said specific years, I also pointed out in an earlier post that it didn't happen 2012. The question isn't why do I watch, but why do you continually rip things out of context? You've clearly humped your neighbors dog one too many times, they way you continually rip things out of context & misquote things.
And how many times are perfectly legal hits getting fines now, all the time
Invalid examples. Those were controversial plays, but those were the exception, not the rule.
Those aren't along the same vein as the the Donkeys getting away with BLATANT rules infractions on continued basis as has been illustrated repeatedly. A 2-yr old could figure that, but you can't?
WRONG!! I'm quite aware of the two different teams the Chiefs had to play as opposed to the Donkeys ( NE and Balt ). The opponents are predetermined, but the sequence in which they play them is not -- it's determined during the off-season and therefore it raises legit questions about why the Donkey's got an easy start to the 1st half of the '97 and '98 and even 2013 seasons.
That's completely bogus. It doesn't happen all the time & in fact, the NFL is coming forth with their explanations of why they are handing out fines for what they consider to be illegal hits. I've seen them do that on NFL.com time and again. Regarding Jerome Woods hit on Ed McCaffery that Woods was fined 10k for, there was no explanation for it or any just cause for it. In fact, McCafferey wasn't even knocked to the ground on that play & if Woods doesn't hit him, then McCaffery catches that tipped pass for a TD and the rules clearly state that once a ball is tipped, then contact is allowed. Woods was innocent of any wrong-doing on that play.
It's ironic that at the same time he has a thread going where he was getting ready to bash a former Chiefs player that stood up for an injured Chiefs QB, and in another thread was talking about how the team was only going to go 7-9.
I asked him straight out if he was a Broncos fan. That's my statement, not Brd's. Look at the responses I got and judge for yourself if I got a straight answer. If it looks like a duck, walks like duck, and quacks like a duck...It should come as no surprise that someone calls it out as a duck. And if he'd said "yes", it's not like he'd been kicked off the board, plenty of fans on the board from other teams. The red flags for me were the constant little argument starting cracks, all the supportive statements of the Broncos (he sourced a report from a website founded by CRAIG MORTON era donks fans), and never a compliment about a Chiefs player.
A lot of folks seem to be trying to turn this into Brd's accountability for his thoughts on the Broncos. Where's Doobs' accountability for the stuff he's posted?