I know you don't think he did enough to be a starter here, but you have to be dumber than a stump if you want to keep claiming he didn't start in the places I listed.
EDIT: I just noticed that you haven't figured out that there are four LBs, not three, in the 3-4. Maybe you should start looking at the depth charts that way.
And the Cards:Arizona Cardinals Depth Chart
Does that look like 3-4 to you?
2005 New England Patriots season - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nice try though. Thanks for playing. Get smarter before you post again.
OK, seriously. shut up. This is getting ridiculous. Who cares who started for the Pats in 2005? this is the most assinine conversation ever. You guys sound like a couple of 6 year olds. At least try and be funny when you insult each other.
What the hell is it going to take for you to admit that beisel has been a backup all his career. Here in KC, in NE and Arizona.
If Bruschi was out with an injury. Then evidentaly Monte was his Backup which is why he played.
Lay off the Shrooms!!!!!
Is Beisel is not starter material.
He is back up/ Special team material.
If he was that good he wouldnt have to bounce around from team to team.
He fills the special team holes.
His most productive season was here, as a backup, in the 4-3.
My personal belief..
If we draft Curry, Beisel does not start in week 1.
If we draft anyone else, Beisel starts in week 1.
unless of course Pioli finds someone else between now and then capable of playing ILB.