Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Wade Smith

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default Wade Smith

    Wade played pretty decent filling in for Albert. Maybe keep him there and move Albert to the right side? Or trade Waters? His play today seemingly gives us some options. Maybe...
    SHUT IT

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    I must say, after injuries happened, the qb seemed to have played better, seems like he had more time to make a throw, to bad our receivers did not catch them.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tornadospotter View Post
    I must say, after injuries happened, the qb seemed to have played better, seems like he had more time to make a throw, to bad our receivers did not catch them.
    You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
    SHUT IT

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,973

    Default

    I remember Wade Smith giving up a sack when he was at LT. Also, I think the Cowgirls stopped blitzing toward the end of the game and were in a prevent defense. So it is difficult to say whether the 2nd stringers were playing better.

    One thing I know, is that we need to have more than two backups at OL, and maybe a few less TEs that never step onto the field.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    I remember Wade Smith giving up a sack when he was at LT. Also, I think the Cowgirls stopped blitzing toward the end of the game and were in a prevent defense. So it is difficult to say whether the 2nd stringers were playing better.

    One thing I know, is that we need to have more than two backups at OL, and maybe a few less TEs that never step onto the field.
    We can't do that because then O'Connell would just be ANOTHER player from this past draft who would be "perceived" to be not contributing to go along with:

    Tyson Jackson 3 tkls in 5 games
    Alex Magee 2 tkls in 4 games
    Donald Washington (3 tkls in 3 games)
    Colin Brown(IR)
    Quinten Lawrence (1 catch for 16 yds in 2 games played)
    Jarvis Williams (practice squad)

    But I'm sure this wonderful talent evaluation is all Herm Edwards' fault as well... These are 6 of the first 8 of "22 off the street to win 2 games." But, Jackson has become the reach EVERYONE IN THE WORLD knew he was at #3, Magee can't sniff the rotation, Washington isn't good enough to beat out Leggitt for playing time, Brown is a joke, Lawrence is bad, and Williams was a waisted draft pick considering the RBs that were already here.

    Like I said before, I'm sure Pioli is on his knees thanking God for Succop. GAWD, DAMN this is depressing.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    We can't do that because then O'Connell would just be ANOTHER player from this past draft who would be "perceived" to be not contributing to go along with:

    Tyson Jackson 3 tkls in 5 games
    Alex Magee 2 tkls in 4 games
    Donald Washington (3 tkls in 3 games)
    Colin Brown(IR)
    Quinten Lawrence (1 catch for 16 yds in 2 games played)
    Jarvis Williams (practice squad)

    But I'm sure this wonderful talent evaluation is all Herm Edwards' fault as well... These are 6 of the first 8 of "22 off the street to win 2 games." But, Jackson has become the reach EVERYONE IN THE WORLD knew he was at #3, Magee can't sniff the rotation, Washington isn't good enough to beat out Leggitt for playing time, Brown is a joke, Lawrence is bad, and Williams was a waisted draft pick considering the RBs that were already here.

    Like I said before, I'm sure Pioli is on his knees thanking God for Succop. GAWD, DAMN this is depressing.
    The bold part isnt true. I remember seeing Washington get beat badly a few times at the beginning of the game, leaving his man wide open by quite a few yards. After which they put in Leggett. At least Leggett was in position to make a play, he just gambled and went for the ball instead of the tackle and thats all she wrote.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    Pretty sure Leggett went for the tackle....i'm sure i saw arms around austin.....

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    The bold part isnt true. I remember seeing Washington get beat badly a few times at the beginning of the game, leaving his man wide open by quite a few yards. After which they put in Leggett. At least Leggett was in position to make a play, he just gambled and went for the ball instead of the tackle and thats all she wrote.
    I think you're making my point for me.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    I think you're making my point for me.
    Kinda what I thought...
    SHUT IT

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    19,198

    Default

    maybe moveing albert and playing smith is something they should try any thing that could help would be nice to see. GO CHIEFS!!!!!!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Chiefs sign WR Bobby Wade
    By yashi in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 09-15-2009, 11:41 PM
  2. Bobby Wade?
    By matthewschiefs in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 10:24 PM
  3. Could we get Marty, Cowher, and Wade Phillips
    By Coach in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 12:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •