Originally Posted by
texaschief
Even after you factor in the first 5 weeks of last season, the Chiefs were 23rd in total offense. After implementing the new offense, they were a top 12 offense last season. I don't care if you want to call it "gimmick," "fake," a "college system," or whatever, the bottom line is that Gailey was able to produce with the talent he had last season and credit goes to Herm Edwards for allowing Gailey to conjure up something that would allow this team to perform on a NFL level.
Since that time, Haley has fired Gailey, his RG, RT, and changed QBs while replacing most of them with lesser talent. The result is an offense that ranks 31st in the league. That goes to the heart of evaluating a head coach.
As I've said before, with the way the NFL is currently constructed, it's impossible to change everything in one year and expect to win. There are only two scenarios at this point. Either Pioli/Haley aren't interested in winning and are just trying to identify players on which to build, or they're idiots.
I think Pioli falls in the former and Haley is somewhere in the middle. Pioli made a GREAT trade to bring in Matt Cassel as his franchise QB. It wasn't a move I thought was necessary for THIS season, but he got great value and Cassel absolutely has potential if he'd learn how to get rid of the ball.
But Pioli brought in his "franchise QB" without either
A) properly evaluating the offensive line that was in place or
B) caring to protect his huge investment.
This is a clear failure, ESPECIALLY if Cassel ends up getting injured before the season is over.
Then, he drafts DEs in the first and third rounds without properly identifying Dorsey as a more than capable starter in the 3-4. Another failure. Then, to top off that little mistake... neither of his draft picks who SHOULD be outperforming Glenn Dorsey at DE, are producing. Jackson and Magee may become good starters for this defense at some point down the road, but they weren't essential for THIS TEAM, THIS YEAR. Period.
What IS essential, however is a capable offensive line that can protect Matt Cassel and the firing of McIntosh (horrible as he was) without first securing at least a comparable replacement is another massive failure.
It's not just the play calling. It's not just the product on the field. It's a series of questionable decisions that have been made up to this point. It seems like people just want to give them a pass on legitimately questionable decisions that have been made since January, just because he was with the Patriots or they are from the Parcells tree.
I would LOVE to have a Parcells type disciplinarian coach than a Tony Dungy/Herm Edwards nice guy, laid back type. But the way Haley is going about his coaching and the way he's evaluating isn't Pacells-esque. Haley sent the coaches off the field during practice friday, leaving the veterans on the team to finish the drills and other crap that had to be done. This was something he's seen Parcells do before when he thought the team was being sloppy and lazy. In reality, Parcells did this 3 times during his 23 year head coaching career. Haley has done it already once in 5 weeks.
There really is a fine line that you have to walk when you decide you're going to be a disciplinarian-type coach and Todd Haley isn't walking that line. His antics are going to wear thin REAL fast and he's going to lose the locker room. This happens in every sport. You see it a lot in baseball. Losing the clubhouse is usually doom for any coach.
You don't really see Haley yelling at the defensive players as much as the offensive players. I think a big reason for this is because this team has been working on the same defensive scheme since OTA's. The offense however, is a brand new scheme that Haley decided to implement one week before the season started. Does that REALLY seem like someone who's capable of making consistently good decisions?
I said this in December and I'm saying it again. Clark Hunt made a bad decision taking so long to hire his new GM. He should've had his guy in place the week after the season ended. It may have been a Pioli issue as well, but the fact that it took so long to get him in place REALLY hurt the player evaluation process. Then, taking so long to fire Edwards was another blow followed by the LOOOONG time it took to find the next head coach. They had a little over a month to evaluate current players before the draft. That hurt us in April. You're seeing that now with the 20 hits Cassel took and the combined 5 tkls TJ and Magee have combined for. One bad draft isn't a reason to fire a GM though. Neither is being the worst team in the league and having the most money to spend.... as long as he has a legitimate reason.
I'm more than willing to give Scott Pioli MORE than 5 years. GMs and head coaches shouldn't be judged by the same criteria. I have a feeling Scott Pioli has an idea of what needs to be done and he has a plan. The patient approach I have with Pioli also stems from the fact that he has a pretty good resume that supports him and warrants the decision to make him the GM of the Kansas City Chiefs. (Something Haley doesn't have)
It's obvious that his #1 priority was to change the defense over to the 3-4. The defense has shown dramatic improvement and while we're actually ranked last in the league in total defense, you have to remember that we've played the #1, #2, #5, and #8 offenses in 4 of the first 5 weeks. I doubt you're going to find too many people who have watched the games that think we've regressed defensively.
However, the transition that has been made could've been made with the players that were either already here or with the free agents we signed. We have ONE player who Pioli brought in who is playing at a level higher than the player he replaced, and that's Mike Vrabel. Neither Mays or Belcher are playing better than Derrick Johnson. Hali has made the transition as seemlessly as can be expected... as has Dorsey. Both he and Gilberry are playing at a higher level than Jackson and Magee. Mike Brown is a lateral move AT BEST from Bernard Pollard. The rest of the defense is the same.
The thing that just bothers me so much about this transition is the coaching staff. Why, if you're Scott Pioli, would you trust this (your first GM job and first rebuild) with someone who has hardly ANY experience as a talent evaluator, even less experience as an offensive coordinator and even less experience as a head coach? Then, if you DO decide he IS your guy, why the hell don't you surround him with the best coaches to give him the best chance to succeed? Wait, what am I saying... he'd just fire them anyway.
But mainly, why is Haley your guy? What has he done during his career that has instilled such a sense of trust that this guy is going to get it right? He made his name by publicly berating one of the best WRs in the league and it's been nothing but more of the same since he's been here.
Pioli/Haley shouldn't be Pioli/Haley. They should be separated for the different decisions each of them make individually. I will say however, from this point forward, that whoever the GM is in each May from this point forward, needs to be fired until the O-line is addressed. I don't care who you are or where you live or what your priority is at this point in your life, if you are going to be the GM for the Kansas City Chiefs, you have to know that the offensive line needs to be rebuilt. PERIOD. Either bring in pro bowl caliber players in free agency or keep spending draft picks on the O-line until you've addressed the problem. If you think the defense is the problem, it's because you haven't opened your eyes and realized the defense is probably giving up points because its on the field way too much.
Fix the O-line.
Bookmarks