Casey Printers

**dragons5** · 09-02-2007, 06:09 PM

Why the heck was he released? The guy was electric during preseason and has a great record from the CFL.

I am starting to lose faith in QB choices by Carl Peterson.

**dragons5** · 09-03-2007, 02:45 PM

Yeah he didn't score, but he didn't throw interceptions or fumble the ball either. He just made great throws and when receivers were unavailable he ran it and got first downs. To me that was some good football.

maybe he will be on the practice team? Maybe another team will pick him up? But I still thought he was way better than Croyle and Huard.

**Coach** · 09-03-2007, 02:47 PM

Originally Posted by dragons5

But I still thought he was way better than Croyle and Huard.

It would have been really tough to have looked worse than these two clowns in the pre-season.

**dragons5** · 09-03-2007, 03:05 PM

Originally Posted by admin

It would have been really tough to have looked worse than these two clowns in the pre-season.

and now the news that they signed a rookie QB... what is going on in their heads?

Man he must have had a really bad personality or something.

**luv** · 09-03-2007, 03:08 PM

Originally Posted by admin

It would have been really tough to have looked worse than these two clowns in the pre-season.

But Huard is rated the second best QB in all of the NFL. Oh wait, that was last year.

**dragons5** · 09-03-2007, 03:11 PM

Originally Posted by luv

But Huard is rated the second best QB in all of the NFL. Oh wait, that was last year.

Just add this to the list of stupid cuts by the Chiefs management. Anyone remember Brian Shay?

http://www.harlonhill.com/Winners/brian_shay_1998.htm

I think he's done now, but the guy rewrote the NCAA record books and couldn't get a starting spot on the team.

**Chiefster** · 09-03-2007, 10:30 PM

Originally Posted by luv

But Huard is rated the second best QB in all of the NFL. Oh wait, that was last year.

HA! Zing!

**stlchief** · 09-04-2007, 12:44 AM

Originally Posted by luv

But Huard is rated the second best QB in all of the NFL. Oh wait, that was last year.

If I knew (or cared) how to give "rep" I would give Luv some for quoting statistics accurately.

Note how she said "was rated the second best" but not "was the second best QB".

And I thought the "zings" about Huard would all be done when everyone associated with professional football is stating the same thing that has been stated by a vocal minority here:

"Croyle is not ready - he proved it in pre-season. Don't throw the season away just to build him. Take a shot w/ Huard, who is no HOF QB, but did do respectably well last year. If he blows the season, then use the reaminder to build Croyle."

I guess this is a unanimous opinion now -- unless, and I don't see how it's really possible, someone still says Croyle should start the opener...

**luv** · 09-04-2007, 01:43 AM

Originally Posted by stlchief

If I knew (or cared) how to give "rep" I would give Luv some for quoting statistics accurately.

Note how she said "was rated the second best" but not "was the second best QB".

Thanks. I think.

I don't believe Huard was the second best QB last year. If he was, I don't believe he would have struggled so much against a second year, no name QB who's not even ready to start to win a spot the very next season. I find it difficult to believe that I'm the only person that seems to bother.

**YZILLA** · 09-04-2007, 04:08 AM

Originally Posted by dragons5

Yeah he didn't score, but he didn't throw interceptions or fumble the ball either. He just made great throws and when receivers were unavailable he ran it and got first downs. To me that was some good football.

maybe he will be on the practice team? Maybe another team will pick him up? But I still thought he was way better than Croyle and Huard.

we are talking about printers right ? Pretty sure he did fumble and lose a preseason game for us in the redzone! the guy has everything a quarterback needs except hes like Dante when he was with the Vikequeens He has cement hands.