Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: with The 5th pic the chiefs pic from N.D. J. Clausen

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    85

    Default with The 5th pic the chiefs pic from N.D. J. Clausen

    With chaz as the new. O.C. this could be the pic. With 37th pic the chiefs pick from N.D. w r. Tate. This wouldn't surpise me.
    Maybe that wouldnt be a bad thing. When would the chiefs get a chance to draft a qb. Just a thought

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default

    Were not drafting a QB.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,128

    Default

    that would be a dumb pick we need o - line and more 0- line

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Neosho, Mo.
    Posts
    208

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kcred View Post
    With chaz as the new. O.C. this could be the pic. With 37th pic the chiefs pick from N.D. w r. Tate. This wouldn't surpise me.
    Maybe that wouldnt be a bad thing. When would the chiefs get a chance to draft a qb. Just a thought
    no disrespect sir but even if you dont like it cassels the man in kc. your gonna judge him on this last season? behind a p.o.s. line dealing with a man formally known as (lj) and no tight end that knows where the first down line is and wide outs that dropped alot and steroid use... cassel is the man cant wait to see him light it up next year... with the number five pick the chiefs select berry. ill love that pic if we keep waters around to teach this line pick up line in later pick and if we can still wilfork from the pats

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    19,198

    Default

    a rookie behind the current o line would be nothing but bad. I think tate is more likely but not with the 5th pick. We either trade down or we take someone on d or o line.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    118

    Default

    I like the golden tate in the 2nd
    I dont even think if Lou Holtz were our GM we would take Clausen, he would just drown the rest of the front office with his spittle all over the place.

    Would be my reaction if took Berry He's an Ed Reed type player He's a ballhawk and a hitter

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Kansas city, MO
    Posts
    2,242

    Default

    You been smoking that whacky weed again I see. QB, tate with the 5th pick. Funny stuff.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default

    If we took a QB with the 5th pick, we would probably have more invested in our QBs than the rest of our team combined. I think there is a 0% chance he gets taken by us first round. Now if he slipped to the 2nd round (probably 1% chance of that) we might take him.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tucson
    Posts
    4,553

    Default

    I would not disagree with Tate in the 2nd. As much as im torn on CAssell right now. I say we are fine at QB I like Croyle. 1st pick WILL be Berry or Otung.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    265

    Default

    I would vote no on both

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •