Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: WR?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11

    Default WR?

    I think it's about time we threw a high pick at a WR (not name Sylvester Morris)

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Kansas city, MO
    Posts
    2,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yashi View Post
    Hey, something that wasn't mentioned, if you want to know what was different with our offensive line later in the season. We started using a lot of zone blocks once Charles took over. I think this helped a lot.

    If You Can't Beat*Them...Zone Them - Arrowhead Pride
    You are correct again!!! And since our offense uses a power blocking scheme, that horrible OC we had did a hell of a job incorporating the zone blocking into his system.

  3. #22
    Member Since
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    Absolutely agree, our d is really bad, our offense is decent. If we just improved our defense and did nothing to our offense we would be a damn good team next year.
    i agree our d is pretty ****ty but we can't just look at d we need an o line to!

  4. #23
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    absolutely we should use our no. 5 pick on a wr (If suh, claussen, okung, berry, mccoy, mcclain, bruce campbell, trent williams, sam bradford, taylor mays, earl thomas, brandon spikes and sergio kindle are gone).
    Great Googly Moogly

    RyanD82 - Twitter

  5. #24
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    I still like Quintin Lawrence. He's fast as lightning and still very young. If he trains hard this offseason he could be very valuable next year.
    Great Googly Moogly

    RyanD82 - Twitter

  6. #25
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hartford, South Dakota
    Posts
    1,409

    Default

    I think Golden Tate from Notre Dame is the man to grab he is a stud ! Watch his 09 highlight Reel :


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikQaUdZrET8"]YouTube- Golden Tate Highlights - Nov. 30, 2009[/ame]

  7. #26
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    The man is studly!

  8. #27
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Now drafting a wr with our 2nd rd pick I have no objections to. Especially if this guy is available. As a Notre Dame fan, i watched this guy play every game this year, and without him, claussen's numbers wouldn't be nearly as good. He's a gamechanger. He's going to be a great NFL player.
    Great Googly Moogly

    RyanD82 - Twitter

  9. #28
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    19,198

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DC_Chiefsfan View Post
    Now drafting a wr with our 2nd rd pick I have no objections to. Especially if this guy is available. As a Notre Dame fan, i watched this guy play every game this year, and without him, claussen's numbers wouldn't be nearly as good. He's a gamechanger. He's going to be a great NFL player.
    I agree and the fact that the coach in charge of the Chiefs offense now was the Coach that made him into that stud is only a plus. Charlie will no whats best for him. If the Chiefs can somehow snag him I think that would be a very good thing.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •