Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Goodell at it again.

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default Goodell at it again.

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...html?eref=sihp

    Can't say I am too happy about this.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ventura, Ca.
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    Banning the three point stance? Does it really matter? I think it all depends on if they make it illegal on both sides of the ball. Right now, the rules are so slanted to protecting offense, that it would suck to have a rule where it was even harder for defenders to do their job.

    I liken this to the changes in baseball in the late 80s and early 90s, where they juiced the ball and lowered the pitchers mound to help hitters be more productive. The unintended consequence to these changes (along with steroid use at the time) was to create a league where pitchers were killing themselves to try and get guys out.

    I don't particular care about how the players change their stance, as long as it is mandated where it levels the field on both sides of the ball.


    Are you man enough? Eric Berry? Apparently Not!

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    That's Crazy!!!!!!!! Haven't Players Been Doing That For Like 90 Years?!?!?!

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    19,196

    Default

    Why dont they just ban defense and get it over with.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    Why dont they just ban defense and get it over with.
    ......................

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    OMG! Lets just ban football!

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tornadospotter View Post
    OMG! Lets just ban football!
    This is getting out of hand.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    19,196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tornadospotter View Post
    OMG! Lets just ban football!
    no they just want to ban defense so they get high scoreing exciting games. They will keep makeing rules to limit what the defense could do.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayvern View Post
    Banning the three point stance? Does it really matter? I think it all depends on if they make it illegal on both sides of the ball. Right now, the rules are so slanted to protecting offense, that it would suck to have a rule where it was even harder for defenders to do their job.

    I liken this to the changes in baseball in the late 80s and early 90s, where they juiced the ball and lowered the pitchers mound to help hitters be more productive. The unintended consequence to these changes (along with steroid use at the time) was to create a league where pitchers were killing themselves to try and get guys out.

    I don't particular care about how the players change their stance, as long as it is mandated where it levels the field on both sides of the ball.

    Its not doing away with the 3 point stance. Its the principle of Goodell being a B**ch and taking everything the NFL has been built on.

    People are renaming it the No fun leauge.

    What is going to be next? They can't intercept the ball?
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

Similar Threads

  1. LJs meeting with Goodell
    By Canada in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 11-01-2008, 04:02 AM
  2. Pacman to meet with Goodell
    By rbedgood in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-01-2007, 10:04 PM
  3. Do you think Roger Goodell will help the NFL?
    By hermhater in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-29-2007, 06:37 PM
  4. Goodell has image problems?
    By hermhater in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-23-2007, 03:15 AM
  5. Goodell Determines Pats Violated League Rules
    By Sweets in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-18-2007, 11:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •