Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: L.T in K.C.??

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default L.T in K.C.??


    0 Not allowed!
    Ok, I may be reaching here, but who thinks having LT here to give Charles breathers and teaching him would be a plus? We dopnt have a real good back-up to charles and in the process he could stick it to SD twice next year with Chambers!!! Just a thought

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    HAWKEYE STATE
    Posts
    386
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    No LT for me we just got rid of a LJ sounds like bad karma to me!!!

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    424
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    If he could be got for a reasonable price, I'd take him for one or two years as a situational back. He could be useful as a change-of-pace back up to Charles or a Jumbo Set short yardage guy... and of course, you always can start running the halfback option with him.

    But he has to be a back up, and he should be earning back up wages.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,051
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 451
    Given: 78

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    depends on what the terms of getting him would be. If we could bring him in as a backup and for not a lot of money then I am all for it. I dont want him brought in to start over Charles. Its time to see what Charles can do for a full season as the starter.

    I realy dont think it will happen. I dont see LT as a guy who will take a backup role and he will probley want to get a lot of money. Under those terms i would not want him.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    38
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I think there's zero chance LT wants to come here...but if no one else wanted him and he's ready to mentor Jamaal then why not? But Jamaal would be THE guy, not LT.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sexy Ville
    Posts
    1,383
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Pearland, Texas
    Posts
    2,872
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Bring him in before training camp, learn everything we can about the San Diego offensive playbook from him and then release him.

    Resident Celebrity

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Joplin, Missouri
    Posts
    395
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I think Chester Taylor would probably be a cheaper option for us and better suited for what we want to do on offense given his ability to catch passes. If we're going to bring in a veteran to backup and teach Jamaal Charles, I think Chester would be a better option than LT.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 3

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Id be happy to have him if he came cheap. I dont know how he'll feel about being a backup to a person thats about 10 years younger than him!

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 3

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by captainamerica View Post
    I think Chester Taylor would probably be a cheaper option for us and better suited for what we want to do on offense given his ability to catch passes. If we're going to bring in a veteran to backup and teach Jamaal Charles, I think Chester would be a better option than LT.
    Chester taylor would be great! But I think the Vikings are trying to hang on to him.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •