Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Worst Rule Change in My Lifetime

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northland
    Posts
    136

    Default Worst Rule Change in My Lifetime

    IMO it makes no sense to change what works....Its called sudden death for a reason...If it wasn't it would just be called the 5th quarter....All of this for a senile old (insert expletive) who THREW AWAY his (maybe) last chance at reaching the Super Bowl

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    I think it will be, or should be adopted for the Regular season, every game played should be by the same rules. Be it preseason, regular season, playoffs and the Super Bowl.
    I am in favor of this change.

  3. #22
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    It's a great rule change. And this applies to us as we will be in the playoffs next year!! Remember, when Pioli took over in New england they went 5-11. The following year they went 11-5 and won the superbowl. I'm not saying we'll win the superbowl, but we'll be a winning team next year!!
    Great Googly Moogly

    RyanD82 - Twitter

  4. #23
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Kansas City! HOME OF THE CHIIIEEEFS!
    Posts
    3,943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slimdagreat View Post
    I hate this.

    OT should be about winning as a team. Not putting the QBs on display.

    And the team that wins the coin toss wins the game about 55% of the time, so its just about equal, there's no advantage to winning the toss in OT. People just think offense matters more than defense

    EDIT:
    I just saw that the rule only applies to FGs, TDs are still sudden death.
    This I can live with.
    It's actually about 60% of the time that the team who wins the toss wins the game. It use to be higher than that at 65%.

    Personally, I've always felt that there should be change with OT rules. In baseball each team receives a turn at bat, but similar isn't true in the NFL, and it can be based upon luck with the coin toss. I don't know what the best solution is, just that I feel each team should have a chance at possessing the ball in OT.

    "Official Chiefs Crowd / Historian/Correspondent / Ambassador"

    "The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall. The real glory is being knocked to your knees and then coming back. That's real glory. That's the essence of it." ~Vince Lombardi~

  5. #24
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    151

    Default

    I always thought overtime should be decided after both teams have a chance to score. I do not like the gamble of a coin toss decided how a team finishes. It's really bad if you have two offensive teams in over time. Whoever gets the toss is guaranteed to win the game.

  6. #25
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default

    I think it's a good rule change, especially for the playoffs. Football shouldn't rely on "chance".

  7. #26
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Kansas City! HOME OF THE CHIIIEEEFS!
    Posts
    3,943

    Default

    I can't edit my post, too late, so will add this...the 60% figure I mentioned in my previous post...is repeated from ESPN's calculations.

    "Official Chiefs Crowd / Historian/Correspondent / Ambassador"

    "The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall. The real glory is being knocked to your knees and then coming back. That's real glory. That's the essence of it." ~Vince Lombardi~

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Worst Firefighter ever!
    By hermhater in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-28-2008, 12:52 PM
  2. This chick would rule at Twister!
    By hermhater in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 01:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •