Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Positional value

  1. #1

    Default Positional value

    Honestly I am kind of tired about hearing about postional value. I just want someone that can come in and play. I feel that we do not need Okung because Albert CAN plat LT maybe he is not the best LT but at least give him another year now that we got some other help on the o line. Everyone says they dont want to spend that much on a safety and I am not all for Eric Berry because I really like Myron Rolle and think we can get him as a value pick in later rounds but I just am kinda tired about hearing how something is positional value I don't care if we took a safety with the number one overall pick as long as that player came in and made the team better. Hell if there was a kicker who could make 70 yard FG against the wind blowing 50 miles in thier face I would take them at number one. I just want someone that can help us win !

  2. #31
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fansincebirth View Post
    LOL your both wrong. Wow

    Just going to keep it simple. S is the biggest need on team.
    LOL you're wrong. Safety is NOT the biggest need on this team. A need, yes, but a nose tackle to anchor this 3-4 is by far the biggest need this team has.
    SHUT IT

  3. #32
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    7,491

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fansincebirth View Post
    LOL your both wrong. Wow

    Just going to keep it simple. S is the biggest need on team. Take Berry. If you get the chance to trade down. Trade down. Take Earl Thomas.

    Everyone wants to blame the pass rush. Watch a game and see how often the ball is thrown in less than 2 seconds. Doesnt matter how good your rush is if the QB has someone open and throws the ball in less than 2 seconds. A safety like Berry lets you play alot more man coverage which alows LB to give better run support, put pressure on QB, and gives the DLine that extra second to sack the QB. Thats is what Polumau and Bob Sanders bring to their defences and make them look so good. btw Polumlu was drafted 16th over all so would it be ok with you if we traded down with SF and took Thomas at 13th or would that be too early.
    So a safety singled handedly would have stopped Cleveland from gashing us for over 300 rushing yards and allowing a no name RB beat Jim Browns single game record.

    There is a lot of needs, including a safety. But as stated, the hole at saftety can easily be fixed in the 2nd or 3rd round. The Chiefs do not need to pass on more important positions becuase there is supposedly another Hall of Famer yet to set foot on the NFL field.

  4. #33
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Olathe
    Posts
    327

    Default

    With a good Safety we would have won that Dallas game too!

  5. #34
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    7,491

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buffman316 View Post
    With a good Safety we would have won that Dallas game too!
    Or a good D line, or a good, ILB, and a good LT.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. 3-4 Positional needs
    By imcorrect in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 11:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •