Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 61

Thread: We should not have got Berry

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    overland park ks
    Posts
    1,825

    Default We should not have got Berry

    For you guys saying we needed a safety maybe so, but not as much as someone to stop the run. Last year our run defense was 31 second to worst, while our pass was not good it was 22 considerably higher then our run defense. We needed someone that can make tackles inside and plug gaping holes in our d-line. What we needed was a NT or a beast OLB to rush the qb so they don't have 2 minutes to throw the ball (which would help our current secondary out) or a ILB that can actually tackle.

  2. #31
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    If we fix our lines and other needs berry will be a great pick. I just hope we can do this with whos left.
    If we get Tate at 2a (which I think we will if he's there), we will have done nothing to fix our lines with our 1st 2 picks. We could still use a couple OL, a NT, an ILB, and maybe an OLB. The most needed is a starting NT imo...
    SHUT IT

  3. #32
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    If we fix our lines and other needs berry will be a great pick. I just hope we can do this with whos left.
    2a. Kindle OLB, pass rush opposite hali

    2b. Troup NT, possible starter...depth/rotation at nose

    3. Lafell WR (or shipley), get some hands out there

    4. Olsen OC, learn behind wiegmann...starting C next year

    5. Johnson ILB, thumper to stuff the run

    5. Black OG, move lilja to LG, waters to RG, and Black eventually takes the reigns from waters

    5. Moeaki TE, pioli gets his TE, great hands

    boom
    Last edited by whatwasthat?; 04-23-2010 at 01:33 PM.

  4. #33
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    For you guys saying we needed a safety maybe so, but not as much as someone to stop the run. Last year our run defense was 31 second to worst, while our pass was not good it was 22 considerably higher then our run defense. We needed someone that can make tackles inside and plug gaping holes in our d-line. What we needed was a NT or a beast OLB to rush the qb so they don't have 2 minutes to throw the ball (which would help our current secondary out) or a ILB that can actually tackle.

    Are you serious?? You wanted to pass on an ELITE cover safety to get some front seven guys who can tackle? lol BTW not only is berry an elite talent in coverage but he will also surprise with how much wood he brings when he tackles. The draft is loaded with front seven guys who can get dirty and tackle. Hell Spikes is the perfect guy to play inside for us. Everyone blasting him for his slow forty time but I would be thrilled to get him with pick 50 then snag maybe a NT like Troup in the 3rd and that interior defense just got a lot better.

  5. #34
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    Are you serious?? You wanted to pass on an ELITE cover safety to get some front seven guys who can tackle? lol BTW not only is berry an elite talent in coverage but he will also surprise with how much wood he brings when he tackles. The draft is loaded with front seven guys who can get dirty and tackle. Hell Spikes is the perfect guy to play inside for us. Everyone blasting him for his slow forty time but I would be thrilled to get him with pick 50 then snag maybe a NT like Troup in the 3rd and that interior defense just got a lot better.
    Man, Spikes will be there in the 3rd. He might even hang around until the 4th or 5th. His draft stock has plummeted since the combine.

  6. #35
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwilliams View Post
    Man, Spikes will be there in the 3rd. He might even hang around until the 4th or 5th. His draft stock has plummeted since the combine.
    i would love to get spikes...i just dont see him as a pioli type guy though

  7. #36
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    39

    Default

    yeah he might. Too many 3-4 teams now, so I wouldn't be shocked if he's gone by our 4th rounder with someone needing a 3-4 ILB. I would be stoked if we could get him in the 4th though.

  8. #37
    Member Since
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ash Grove
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Spikes will be so Average in the NFL

    When you look at the Youth we have at D-Line along with new coaching staff.

    I would be suprised to see more than a NT picked. Edwards is a Starter he just didnt have any relief last year and was done by the middle of the 3rd Quarter. You need at least 2 if not 3 NT to rotate in the game. We got Shaun Smith, now we can pick up a NT and be very solid.

    BTW the only reason we ranked that high in pass coverage last year was because they didnt have to throw against us. They were too busy killing the clock and protecting their lead. Did you watch any games last year.

  9. #38
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Location
    hollywood
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Troupe or Thomas will be available in the third.

    the more I think about it, the more I believe that Golden Tate is the perfect player to come in.

    Normally, receivers need one or two years to adjust to the pro game. So, instead of paying a Decker or Benn for a year of learning the system, we could have an immediate contributor, someone who literally has spent three years learning all of the routes, terminology, and schemes. he has been the #1 in the system as well as the #2, so he could come in and contribute wherever they want him.

    I would like to see Tate and Saffold in the second, with Cam thomas in the third.

    If they really feel like they need a nose tackle right now, then Tate and Joseph (not high on cody) with Veldheer or Asamoah in the third.

  10. #39
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SAPHOJUNKIE View Post
    Troupe or Thomas will be available in the third.

    the more I think about it, the more I believe that Golden Tate is the perfect player to come in.

    Normally, receivers need one or two years to adjust to the pro game. So, instead of paying a Decker or Benn for a year of learning the system, we could have an immediate contributor, someone who literally has spent three years learning all of the routes, terminology, and schemes. he has been the #1 in the system as well as the #2, so he could come in and contribute wherever they want him.

    I would like to see Tate and Saffold in the second, with Cam thomas in the third.

    If they really feel like they need a nose tackle right now, then Tate and Joseph (not high on cody) with Veldheer or Asamoah in the third.
    Tate would be perfect for our offense. Given the way ND players are dropping though, I wouln't be surprised if he were there at 2b.

  11. #40
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tucson
    Posts
    4,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    For you guys saying we needed a safety maybe so, but not as much as someone to stop the run. Last year our run defense was 31 second to worst, while our pass was not good it was 22 considerably higher then our run defense. We needed someone that can make tackles inside and plug gaping holes in our d-line. What we needed was a NT or a beast OLB to rush the qb so they don't have 2 minutes to throw the ball (which would help our current secondary out) or a ILB that can actually tackle.

    wawawawa last year i got the screw by them taking jackson...finally they get my player!!!

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. We did it. We got Eric Berry!
    By buffman316 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 04-24-2010, 08:37 PM
  2. Berry All-Access
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 10:39 AM
  3. life without berry
    By jacko58 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-07-2010, 07:11 AM
  4. For those of you who Think we are taking Berry at #5
    By YZILLA in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 03-26-2010, 06:57 PM
  5. Berry And Mays
    By Subversion in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 05:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •