Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: ridiculous

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    305
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default ridiculous


    0 Not allowed!
    i was reading an article on kcchiefs.com and in the comments there were a ton of people who were anti-berry, pro-OT before the selection of berry

    now they are all ranting and raving about how we should pick up mays and how it will improve our whole D...i just cant see this happening...not with cody, kindle, and tate available...i do not think pioli is considering it either

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by whatwasthat? View Post
    i was reading an article on kcchiefs.com and in the comments there were a ton of people who were anti-berry, pro-OT before the selection of berry

    now they are all ranting and raving about how we should pick up mays and how it will improve our whole D...i just cant see this happening...not with cody, kindle, and tate available...i do not think pioli is considering it either
    Well, I wanted Okung, not Berry. Now, I'm open to drafting Mays at 2a. Why?

    First, we still have no SS. Berry is a FS, and we'd be idiots to play him out of position.

    Second, Pioli really and truly seems to believe that Albert is a legit LT, which means we aren't drafting OT too high.

    Third, a good NT should be available at 2b. Either Thomas, Cody, or Joseph should drop.

    Fourth, just the idea of Berry/Mays at safety makes me grin at the insanity of it. That would a be a freakishly athletic safety duo that would be immensely fun to watch.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    305
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by bwilliams View Post
    Well, I wanted Okung, not Berry. Now, I'm open to drafting Mays at 2a. Why?

    First, we still have no SS. Berry is a FS, and we'd be idiots to play him out of position.

    Second, Pioli really and truly seems to believe that Albert is a legit LT, which means we aren't drafting OT too high.

    Third, a good NT should be available at 2b. Either Thomas, Cody, or Joseph should drop.

    Fourth, just the idea of Berry/Mays at safety makes me grin at the insanity of it. That would a be a freakishly athletic safety duo that would be immensely fun to watch.
    i truly believe that the chiefs plan on moving page to SS...he has the exact build you would want out of that position

    if we want to go SS, i would wait until 3 and try to take darrell stuckey

    i was almost positive we werent going OT...days ago pioli sternly said "albert is our LT"

    im pulling for torrell troup at 2b...i dont really want cody
    Last edited by whatwasthat?; 04-23-2010 at 02:19 PM.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,052
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 451
    Given: 78

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I dont want anther safety in todays picks. We cant fill a defense of all safetys and like I have said I think there are much bigger needs.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Scottsdale,Az
    Posts
    1,292
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    No more safety's. Was just listening to ESPN Radio and Eric Casilius (sp) was talking about every person in the complex he talked to was down on Okung

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,959
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 60
    Given: 22

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by whatwasthat? View Post
    i truly believe that the chiefs plan on moving page to SS...he has the exact build you would want out of that position

    if we want to go SS, i would wait until 3 and try to take darrell stuckey

    i was almost positive we werent going OT...days ago pioli sternly said "albert is our LT"

    im pulling for torrell troup at 2b...i dont really want cody
    Berry played SS in college though, why would they move him to FS?
    Diehard Fan Living in Packer Territory

    Co-Founder: 2 Mugs Fantasy Football -- a site about and football!

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Location
    hollywood
    Posts
    404
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Berry is a complete safety. He is big enough at 211 lbs for run support, but has freakish range to play free safety.

    Page is a less-talented version of berry. he has ball skills, speed, and size for hitting power. He just isn't as good. We should play them together, and Page as the #2 safety is a fantastic situation. I love the idea of mays as well, but we just don't need hiim.

    With Dan Williams dropping so far, it really allows us to wait on the nose tackle.

    personally, I think we should be looking at OL, NT, WR, and ILB over the next three picks.

    Maybe we can trade back from #36 and pick up another third rounder. then we could go with Tate and a NT in the 2nd, then pick up Veldheer and Spikes in the third. Of course, trading back is contingent on a team going after kindle, clausen, or mccoy.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ash Grove
    Posts
    143
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by whatwasthat? View Post
    i truly believe that the chiefs plan on moving page to SS...he has the exact build you would want out of that position

    if we want to go SS, i would wait until 3 and try to take darrell stuckey

    i was almost positive we werent going OT...days ago pioli sternly said "albert is our LT"

    im pulling for torrell troup at 2b...i dont really want cody
    Never agreed with you more. Cody may be top man on our board at 2a im ok with it then but like you we can get one deeper. My sleeper is Linval Joseph Monster just waiting for a little technic coaching.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryfo18 View Post
    Berry played SS in college though, why would they move him to FS?
    He only played SS his senior year. While he was good at it, I would want someone with his athleticism ballhawking, knocking around WRs, and supporting our CBs in coverage. Not getting injured (at most elite SS do - see Sanders, Bob and Polamulu, Troy) by playing the run in the box.

    I mean, I think #5 was awfully high for a free safety for precisely this reason. But it would be crazy to waste Berry's coverage skills and athleticism in SS position, especially if he gets injured and there's $11M sitting on the bench.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    305
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by bwilliams View Post
    He only played SS his senior year. While he was good at it, I would want someone with his athleticism ballhawking, knocking around WRs, and supporting our CBs in coverage. Not getting injured (at most elite SS do - see Sanders, Bob and Polamulu, Troy) by playing the run in the box.

    I mean, I think #5 was awfully high for a free safety for precisely this reason. But it would be crazy to waste Berry's coverage skills and athleticism in SS position, especially if he gets injured and there's $11M sitting on the bench.

    agreed...berry played FS his freshman and softmore year...hes a true ballhawk...it would be a waste of his talents not to put him in center field and let him make game-changing plays

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •