Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Lb & Nt

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default Lb & Nt

    Who thinks we need to draft a LB and a NT with our next two draft picks? I do.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default

    I'm on your page Aussie. I can't complain about what they've done so far though. Not the route I ever thought they'd take, but again, can't complain.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryfo18 View Post
    I'm on your page Aussie. I can't complain about what they've done so far though. Not the route I ever thought they'd take, but again, can't complain.
    Yeah I didn't think they were gonna go this way either but I've gotta say! Great work!

  4. #4
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
    Who thinks we need to draft a LB and a NT with our next two draft picks? I do.

    Beyond the third round, everything is pretty much long-shots and projects. That is where we should be looking for KRs Nicklebacks and TEs.

    Oh, wait.... Yeah, sure.

    Since we have addressed our biggest needs, of KR, Nickle and TE, might as well take a flyer on some unimportant positions like LOT, NT and LB.


  5. #5
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Beyond the third round, everything is pretty much long-shots and projects. That is where we should be looking for KRs Nicklebacks and TEs.

    Oh, wait.... Yeah, sure.

    Since we have addressed our biggest needs, of KR, Nickle and TE, might as well take a flyer on some unimportant positions like LOT, NT and LB.

    You forget, we addressed our most important position. That of PLAYMAKER! Isn't a PLAYMAKER all that we needed, really?

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Beyond the third round, everything is pretty much long-shots and projects. That is where we should be looking for KRs Nicklebacks and TEs.

    Oh, wait.... Yeah, sure.

    Since we have addressed our biggest needs, of KR, Nickle and TE, might as well take a flyer on some unimportant positions like LOT, NT and LB.

    i think Dexter McCluster can be a KR.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
    i think Dexter McCluster can be a KR.
    Yeah. I was being a "sour grapes" sarcastic a**.

    KR gets an opportuinty to do something on about three or four plays per game. I actually don't think that that is a more important position to fill than .... any of the 22 starting positions, that are at least out there for half the game.

    Same with Nickleback. And TE is also a part-time position.

    It's as if we have such a great bunch of offensive and defensive starters, that we don't need them, and can go after these part-timers.

    But this great bunch of starters are the same guys, for the most part, that have been absolutely terrible for the past couple of seasons.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    22,845

    Default

    Bwilliams and chief31, marriage made in heaven. Two most optimistic people I know.

    ____________
    Posted from my BlackBerry, PM me for Details


  9. #9
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    Bwilliams and chief31, marriage made in heaven. Two most optimistic people I know.

    ____________
    Posted from my BlackBerry, PM me for Details
    I'm not trying to be pessimistic. But damn. Do you really like this draft? Do you really better about the Chiefs now than you did at the end of 2009?

    I don't. I do not think this draft improved this team except in the most superficial ways. I would trade our entire draft to any team not named the Jaguars or Bills right now.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwilliams View Post
    I'm not trying to be pessimistic. But damn. Do you really like this draft? Do you really better about the Chiefs now than you did at the end of 2009?

    I don't. I do not think this draft improved this team except in the most superficial ways. I would trade our entire draft to any team not named the Jaguars or Bills right now.
    You can't be serious?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •