Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Lb & Nt

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default Lb & Nt

    Who thinks we need to draft a LB and a NT with our next two draft picks? I do.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
    You can't be serious?
    The Raiders had a better draft than us. The f***ing Raiders.

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    39

    Default

    LOL really? Then you must have been one miserable sob going into last season cause this draft is 100000000x better than last years.

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwilliams View Post
    The Raiders had a better draft than us. The f***ing Raiders.
    That's going too far. The chiefs had a great draft!

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    LOL really? Then you must have been one miserable sob going into last season cause this draft is 100000000x better than last years.
    I could chalk last year's draft up to the idea that the cupboard was bare. While I didn't like that our 1st two picks were 3-4 DEs, I understood that we needed them. I though Washington, Brown, and the rest (excluding Succop) were bad picks, but I believed they were attempts to build special teams and depth. I couldn't figure many better players to be had in the 4-7 rounds.

    In other words, I wasn't expecting much, so it didn't bother me when we didn't get much. I expected more this year, especially since it was obvious from the 2009 season that our front-7 and OL just weren't good. My expectations were higher, and the return was about the same, or maybe even worse.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
    That's going too far. The chiefs had a great draft!
    I would trade all of our picks picks for Veldheer, McClain, and Houston.

    Those aren't PLAYMAKERS, but they're NFL-caliber starters at positions of great need.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    The draft was bad because we only filled one need. We did absolutely nothing to fix our putrid run-defense. I can't believe we're actually looking to stick with the same horrible LBs.
    C:\Users\Master Sin\Desktop\thumb_pl_180492.jpg

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Three7s View Post
    The draft was bad because we only filled one need. We did absolutely nothing to fix our putrid run-defense. I can't believe we're actually looking to stick with the same horrible LBs.
    The only thing I think they could have done better is draft a LB in the 3rd round.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11

    Default

    other then berry the rest of the draft has been a huge mistake

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •