Hmmm...Patrick Crayton?

**SAPHOJUNKIE** · 05-14-2010, 12:54 PM

Espn's NFC East blog had a blurb about Patrick Crayton being the odd man out in Dallas.

Between Roy Williams, Dez Bryant, Miles Austin, and Jason Witten, they have plenty of pass catchers.

Crayton has sure hands, is willing to go over the middle, and is a very good punt returner.

Also, Todd Haley coached him from 2004-2006.

Crayton is still young, only a six year vet, and would instantly come in and compete with McCluster for the slot, perhaps even for the #2 WR position.

If he gets cut, I would love to see us go for him. I'd love to see us go for him before then in a trade. I'm thinking a fourth rounder would do it, maybe even a fifth.

He's not a game-changer by any means, but I still think we need a solid vet as our possession receiver.

**chief31** · 05-14-2010, 11:44 PM

I believe it was in '08 when I started to like Crayton. But I haven't heard much from him since.

I would be happy if he were to be released and then we signed him. But probably not real thrilled with a trade.

**DC_Chiefsfan** · 05-15-2010, 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by SAPHOJUNKIE

Six years
196 career catches
2888 yards
23 TDs

vs

Five years
87 catches
1231 yards
7 TDs

Sorry, but Crayton is a MUCH more productive receiver. I know Urban was on a team with Boldin and Fitzgerald, but Crayton has consistently played with talent around him, too.

I'm not saying it's the answer, but I wouldn't be surprised to see us pick him up. Maybe not in a trade, but certainly in free agency

Crayton has also been given more opportunity. There's also not a hug difference in productivity averages:

Crayton = 14.73 yds per catch and caught a TD every 8.5 receptions in 82 games played.

Urban = 14.15 yds per catch and caught a TD every 12.4 receptions in 47 games played.

Should we pick up Crayton if he's realeased? Absolutely, the more WR depth the better for Haley. Should we trade anything for him? Absolutely not.

**chief31** · 05-15-2010, 04:35 PM

Originally Posted by DC_Chiefsfan

Crayton = caught a TD every 8.5 receptions in 82 games played.

Urban = caught a TD every 12.4 receptions in 47 games played.

That is actually a pretty big difference.

**DC_Chiefsfan** · 05-15-2010, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by chief31

That is actually a pretty big difference.

It is, but given the circumstances of their playing time and WR depth chart, I think it's misleading. For the most part, Crayton played behind TO in Dallas, he was 2nd/3rd string most of his tenure including last year while behind Austin and Williams. Urban played behind Fitzgerald, Boldin and Breaston (and a lot of times Doucet) most of his career and still managed to get the ball. In 2008, all three of the guys ahead of him had 1000 yrd receiving years and he was still fairly productive as a 4th string wideout despite not being on the field that much (448 receiving and 4 TDs). Whereas, in 2008 Crayton (as a starting WR) compiled 550 yds and 4TDs. In 2009 though, Urban was pushed into 5th on the depth chart whereas Crayton was still 3rd. Gee whiz I sure did get caught up in this more than I thought!

Anyways, all I'm saying is that these guys are very comparable except that Urban is 2 years younger and has the same amount of years in the league. So I wouldn't trade anything for Crayton. And if we don't get him in free agency, I'm still not that concerned.

**chief31** · 05-15-2010, 05:19 PM

Originally Posted by DC_Chiefsfan

It is, but given the circumstances of their playing time and WR depth chart, I think it's misleading. For the most part, Crayton played behind TO in Dallas, he was 2nd/3rd string most of his tenure including last year while behind Austin and Williams. Urban played behind Fitzgerald, Boldin and Breaston (and a lot of times Doucet) most of his career and still managed to get the ball. In 2008, all three of the guys ahead of him had 1000 yrd receiving years and he was still fairly productive as a 4th string wideout despite not being on the field that much (448 receiving and 4 TDs). Whereas, in 2008 Crayton (as a starting WR) compiled 550 yds and 4TDs. In 2009 though, Urban was pushed into 5th on the depth chart whereas Crayton was still 3rd. Gee whiz I sure did get caught up in this more than I thought!

Anyways, all I'm saying is that these guys are very comparable except that Urban is 2 years younger and has the same amount of years in the league. So I wouldn't trade anything for Crayton. And if we don't get him in free agency, I'm still not that concerned.

I think the reason I would put a bit more stock into Crayton is because of that experience advantage.

**texaschief** · 05-17-2010, 12:24 AM

This thread was referenced on ESPN as the source of Crayton coming here on their rumors page. lol nice

I'm neutral on Crayton as long as we don't trade for him.

**Chiefster** · 05-17-2010, 03:28 AM

Originally Posted by texaschief

This thread was referenced on ESPN as the source of Crayton coming here on their rumors page. lol nice

I'm neutral on Crayton as long as we don't trade for him.

The "Crowd" is making a difference!

**70 chiefsfan70** · 05-17-2010, 10:53 AM

I say competition is GOOD, and so long as it does cost us lets have more. It makes the real players stand out!

**SAPHOJUNKIE** · 05-17-2010, 12:53 PM

Originally Posted by texaschief

This thread was referenced on ESPN as the source of Crayton coming here on their rumors page. lol nice

I'm neutral on Crayton as long as we don't trade for him.

No way...

Can you copy/paste that? My insider account expired, and I can't look it up!

**SAPHOJUNKIE** · 05-17-2010, 01:19 PM

Oh my gosh, just saw for myself.

Hilarious.

ESPN.com NFC East blogger Matt Mosley wrote on Thursday that Patrick Crayton could end up being released by the Dallas Cowboys, now that the team has several other options at the receiver position. He adds that it might be a mistake, seeing as how Crayton is reliable and depth at the position could be important for the Cowboys this season; nevertheless, there is a good chance it could happen. Calvin Watkins of ESPNDallas.com relayed word on Sunday night from Crayton's agent that the receiver will not attend OTAs this week, a possible sign that something is currently being worked out.

A full list of suitors for Crayton has not yet emerged (a trade would be unlikely, as interested teams will probably wait for him to be let go), but one option that has been put forward is the Kansas City Chiefs. The blog ChiefsCrowd.com suggests the team as a great fit for Crayton, where he could compete for the slot receiver position with rookie Dexter McCluster, and possibly factor in on the outside as well. If Crayton does get released from the 'Boys, several receiver-needy teams could come calling.