Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49

Thread: So certain are we?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Grain Valley, MO
    Posts
    2,425

    Default So certain are we?

    The most notable losses for the Chiefs the past offseason were Will Shields and Trent Green. I think it's safe to say that it was honestly Trent's time to go. Certainly feeling doubted and perhaps wronged by the Chiefs, Trent may find enough fuel to ingnite a spark and return to shades of his former glory in Miami. However, if he had stayed in Kansas City that spark would probably have more accurately resembled a sputter. Perhaps turning into a cloud of smoke as an afterthought to an otherwise bright career here. I'm glad for Trent and the opportunity he is getting with the Dolphins but I am also glad that he is no longer under center for the Chiefs.

    The retirement of Will Shields could be said to be more significant and the reverberations of this may be felt by the organization and fans for some time. In all honesty, there is nobody the Chiefs could have picked up then that would prove to be as valuable an asset as Shields. Coupled with the loss of Willie Roaf the previous season, we now get to witness the re-tooling of an offensive line.

    Though the situation may seem bleak to some, two things can be said for the Chiefs offensive line this year. Those being Waters and Wiegmann. Both of these guys are stand-out players in a league where linemen are severely underrated. Once one considers the fact that both Turley and Welbourne have been in the Chiefs' system for several years, the situation begins to look a little less dire. Of course, we won't look as good without the hall of fame lineup we once had. In fact, it may be a very long time before any team is blessed enough to boast quality players akin to the likes of Roaf, Shields, Waters, and Wiegmann on the same front. While some may contest the ability of Turley and Welbourne to perform, at least they had a chance to learn from some of the best. Given time, the recently promoted starters on the line could prove to be at least something along the lines of decent.

    That being said, where is this rapid decent within the roster to so severely cripple a team that made the playoffs last year? With additions of young talent to the receiving corps and a defense that has vastly improved since the Chiefs' playoff appearance prior to their last one, perhaps they have simply traded some of their strengths for weaknesses and vise versa.

    From a casual distance, it seems this team may not have too much to worry about after all. While Shields' retirement was inevitable, the trading of Green is arguably beneficial. Without listing stats, it can be said that Damon Huard performed his job admirably last year in Trent Green's absence. If nothing else, Huard could at least be considered dependable in his abilities.

    Again, where is this monumental decline that the media and even dedicated Chiefs' fans keep referring to? Is the loss of two guys really going be so devestating that it effecively reduces a winning team to rubble?

    Some may not think so until they look at other key positional changes made by the Chiefs leading up to the regular season.

    Releasing Dante Hall did seem to make sense until they signed another guy to specialize in returning kicks instead of giving the opportunity to one of the young guys already with the team. Drummond's performance has been less than impressive thus far and for the sake of my blood pressure, I hope he gets it together soon.

    If Lawrence Tynes had not been plagued by the occasional botching of extra points, he may not have been released. Tynes was good on over 78 percent of his attempts last season with two game-winners. As it is, the Chiefs spent a 5th round pick to acquire Justin Medlock-- a guy who seemed to have a lax attitude toward practice and held out for a short time during training camp as a rookie kicker.

    Medlock's work ethic could be said to have shown in his performance on the field. After a terribly inconsistent preseason, Medlock was already on a thin rope heading into the regular season. I guess missing his first kick in the regular season was enough to drop him. After week one the Chiefs have already replaced Medlock with third-year kicker, Dave Rayner.

    With the defensive philosophy of Herm Edwards, I suspect the reason for all of this was to get a sure-footed kicker that would be reliable in close, defensive contests. It seems that has not panned-out so well. Now the Chiefs must look to Rayner to provide some consistency.

    At first glance, these roster changes are not enough to quench my enthusiasm. I am hopeful for this season and have confidence in the talent of this team. However, upon further inspection, some mistakes have been made. Are these mistakes profound enough to so thouroughly decimate the Chiefs from the inside-out as the national media and many fans have predicted? I certainly hope not but you can bet we will soon find out.
    Last edited by m0ef0e; 09-14-2007 at 10:48 PM.
    Thanks for all the yards, TDs, and memories, Priest!

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,843

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sling58 View Post
    Our offensive line is getting better. They are getting used to playing together more and they will start to gel. We didn't let the offense of the Bears beat us, just that Danged Hester. All in all it was a good game and even though we didn't get the W i am happy with the improvement I saw.
    There was a lot to hang your hat on...as you stated KC let Hester beat them. First of all, kicking to him is dangerous, but if you're going to do so, don't lose your lanes...clearly the coverage was supposed to funnel him to the sideline. There was a guy who made a feeble diving attempt at tackling Hester as he broke loose down the sideline...my best guess is this is the guy who missed his lane assignment and wasn't in position to force Hester out of bounds.

    You guys get your top DE back this week, and are facing a young MN team. Beware though Adrian Peterson is a stud at RB, much better than Cedric Benson. I would assume after TJackson's pathetic performance in Detroit, Childress will lean on AP heavily.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The 49ers own my heart, but the Chiefs will always hold a better than neutral spot for giving my favorite player a place to leave with grace...

    Resident Comedian/Statistician/Researcher/Diplomat

  3. #22
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbedgood View Post
    There was a lot to hang your hat on...as you stated KC let Hester beat them. First of all, kicking to him is dangerous, but if you're going to do so, don't lose your lanes...clearly the coverage was supposed to funnel him to the sideline. There was a guy who made a feeble diving attempt at tackling Hester as he broke loose down the sideline...my best guess is this is the guy who missed his lane assignment and wasn't in position to force Hester out of bounds.

    You guys get your top DE back this week, and are facing a young MN team. Beware though Adrian Peterson is a stud at RB, much better than Cedric Benson. I would assume after TJackson's pathetic performance in Detroit, Childress will lean on AP heavily.
    I stated in earlier this year when I found out that AP was going to play against us. AP meet Jared Allen (as Jared knocks the Ole Sooner on his butt!)

    GO CHIEFS!!!!!
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  4. #23
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,843

    Default

    I think KC will win this game, but if they're not careful AP is capable of running roughshod. If Allen gets too eager to get in the backfield, AP has already shown he can take a screen pass to the house.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The 49ers own my heart, but the Chiefs will always hold a better than neutral spot for giving my favorite player a place to leave with grace...

    Resident Comedian/Statistician/Researcher/Diplomat

  5. #24
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbedgood View Post
    I think KC will win this game, but if they're not careful AP is capable of running roughshod. If Allen gets too eager to get in the backfield, AP has already shown he can take a screen pass to the house.

    KC is notorious for yanking defeat out of the jaws of victory; but at least Next week will be at Arrowhead.

  6. #25
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    I have not been disapointed with the outcome of either of the Chiefs games, to this point. I expected to lose and was pleasently surprised by the number of passing plays that have been called. (Probably because we were trailing in those games.)

    Next week is another story. I expect the Chiefs to win this game. If they can't win at home, against a rebuilding Vikings team, then I will be ****ed-off!!!!

  7. #26
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    I have not been disapointed with the outcome of either of the Chiefs games, to this point. I expected to lose and was pleasently surprised by the number of passing plays that have been called. (Probably because we were trailing in those games.)

    Next week is another story. I expect the Chiefs to win this game. If they can't win at home, against a rebuilding Vikings team, then I will be ****ed-off!!!!
    Pleased about the number of passing plays?????????

    This is mind boggling to me but I guess that's par for us!! How about the 3rd and two passing play? Did you like that?

  8. #27
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    2,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    Pleased about the number of passing plays?????????

    This is mind boggling to me but I guess that's par for us!! How about the 3rd and two passing play? Did you like that?
    And what was with giving the ball to LJ at the end of the first half?

    We did throw more, but at very odd times.
    Everything happens for a reason.

  9. #28
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Grain Valley, MO
    Posts
    2,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    Pleased about the number of passing plays?????????

    This is mind boggling to me but I guess that's par for us!! How about the 3rd and two passing play? Did you like that?
    Oh man, that was terrible. We ran the ball on 3rd and 9 all game while we are down by muliple scores. We showed no killer instinct early on the road like we should have. Then we get in much-needed scoring position and throw a red-zone INT on 3rd and 2?!?!??! Retarded. After the game, Herm kinda threw Damon under the bus by saying it was Huard's call. That seemed kinda like finger-pointing so soon after a loss to me. Certainly, Huard is already aware he is on thin ice, as he should be. I think Herm is beginning to realize that he needs to get something together or his job will be in jeopardy as well. If the mistake was Huard's then Herm should hold him accountable by all means. I see a lot of coaches take credit for bad calls, though. If for nothing else, to keep extra pressure off a player so they can focus on doing their job and improving at said job instead of being hounded all week about a bad decision.
    Thanks for all the yards, TDs, and memories, Priest!

  10. #29
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    Pleased about the number of passing plays?????????

    This is mind boggling to me but I guess that's par for us!! How about the 3rd and two passing play? Did you like that?
    Yes. If Sammie Parker had been a man, you would have liked it too. We piss and moan about being too predictable, then piss and moan about not doing what the whole world expected.

    Quote Originally Posted by m0ef0e View Post
    Oh man, that was terrible. We ran the ball on 3rd and 9 all game while we are down by muliple scores. We showed no killer instinct early on the road like we should have. Then we get in much-needed scoring position and throw a red-zone INT on 3rd and 2?!?!??! Retarded. After the game, Herm kinda threw Damon under the bus by saying it was Huard's call. That seemed kinda like finger-pointing so soon after a loss to me. Certainly, Huard is already aware he is on thin ice, as he should be. I think Herm is beginning to realize that he needs to get something together or his job will be in jeopardy as well. If the mistake was Huard's then Herm should hold him accountable by all means. I see a lot of coaches take credit for bad calls, though. If for nothing else, to keep extra pressure off a player so they can focus on doing their job and improving at said job instead of being hounded all week about a bad decision.
    Huards call, I think, was where to throw it, not to run a passing play.

  11. #30
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Grain Valley, MO
    Posts
    2,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Huards call, I think, was where to throw it, not to run a passing play.
    I see. You are probably right. The throw was actually a good one, btw. That defender barely got a hand on it. If that had been Bowe instead of Parker, I think that would have been another touchdown because Bowe would have just taken the ball out of the air. Parker still sucks.
    Thanks for all the yards, TDs, and memories, Priest!

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •