Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Weis as primary play caller

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,502

    Default Weis as primary play caller

    I see this as one more positive heading into the new season.

    While he has no where near the weapons he did in NE and I dont look for complete turn around yet, I can see Cassel being able to go to Charlie on the sideline and get help making in game adjustments.

    To me it seemed like that was one of the biggest problems last year with Haley calling plays and everything else he took on. It should be interesting to see how much freedom coach Haley gives Weis.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bbacker51 View Post
    It may have worked out better for Haley to call plays last year. If he wanted to see what someone was made of, call a play and put him on the spot. Then he would know if he was a keeper..........or a Bronco
    it worked out 100% better.if we would have stayed with gailey's scheme we would be that much farther behind this year.haley's and weisse's offense of philosophy intertwine with each other giving the offense the experiance from last year is no doubt going to help for this year. and we still even won 2 more games than when sp#rm was coaching

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ventura, Ca.
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    I agree about the first time coach takeing on to much. But I think in the long run it didn't really matter. We were not going to be a good team in anyway last season no matter who was calling the plays.

    I was really easy on Haley last season because of the fact he walked into a mess that was made of CP on H.E. This year I EXPECT to see a MUCH better team on the field. As long as this team takes a big step forward this season I will stay on the Haley bandwagon.
    Essentially to me this means that we had two ego-maniacs at the helm and neither wanted to listen to the ideas of the other. If it truly was a situation where Haley let Gailey go because they were not eye to eye on the offense, then that does not bode well for teamwork. Haley had to make the decision he made, I still don't believe it was a good one.

    This season, he will start with a clean slate with me, well maybe there is still some residue on the slate from last year and some of his seamingly stupid decisions, but hopefully he can make up for those.


    Are you man enough? Eric Berry? Apparently Not!

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayvern View Post
    The only reason I have lightened up on Haley is because of his hiring of Wies and Crennell. He should never have been calling the plays last year, but he did. A first time head coach in the league should not be the guy calling plays.
    I agree, the firing of, sorry, the leaving of the OC, one week before regular season, was stupid.
    I hope that it was a fluke and that he turns it around this year. I think he has three years to make it to the playoffs at this point or he will be out on his ear.
    Not sure if I will agree to 3 years to make playoffs, will wait and see. But I agree, out if not there in 3.

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    I agree about the first time coach takeing on to much. But I think in the long run it didn't really matter. We were not going to be a good team in anyway last season no matter who was calling the plays.

    I was really easy on Haley last season because of the fact he walked into a mess that was made of CP on H.E. This year I EXPECT to see a MUCH better team on the field. As long as this team takes a big step forward this season I will stay on the Haley bandwagon.
    If I see major improvements this season, I may get on the Haley bandwagon.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    711

    Default

    So if this years team goes say 7-9 this year and 10-6 next year and just misses the playoffs you guys would want haley out?

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    158

    Default

    not me, a 10 win season would be a little slice of pigskin heaven right now, or even next season. Anything to keep herm edwards off the sidelines with a smirk on his face when his team is down 40 points.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bbacker51 View Post
    not me, a 10 win season would be a little slice of pigskin heaven right now, or even next season. Anything to keep herm edwards off the sidelines with a smirk on his face when his team is down 40 points.
    god that was annoying when he would do that. i can not even stand him as an analysis for espn

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    414

    Default

    last season was such an experiment, they were not planning on winning anything last year. it was to build a foun dation, build player development, build knowledge of what players can expect... if you think Haley was trying to win a superbowl last year your sorely mistaken. People sometimes forget that. Yes, you "play to win the game".... but not your first year as a team. Keyshawn Johnson said the exact same thing before opening day kickoff. he basically said Haley will never admit it, but that first year was just used to experiment and see what they had to work with. with a full 365 days to get his program in place, I am expecting the Chiefs to start playing to win games now...
    J5, Cassel, Tamba, Brandon Flowers, all going pro bowl in 2010, Chiefs go 9-7, make Wild Card playoffs...

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kissimmee, FL
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slc chief View Post
    god that was annoying when he would do that. i can not even stand him as an analysis for espn
    Whenever he is on I find myself saying "Why would ANYONE listen to his opinion?"

    God I hate that guy. Still can't understand running screens or passes to the flat when it's 3rd and 15.

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    158

    Default

    atleast they are on the right track..........Herm had 3 "rebuilding" years and still couldn't do anything. His only good year was after his first when he was still riding vermeil's tail

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Redskins vs. Giants, Play-by-play
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 132
    Last Post: 12-21-2009, 11:37 PM
  2. Saints @ Cowboys, (first Quarter) Play-by-play
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-19-2009, 09:01 PM
  3. Jags vs. Colts, PLay-by-play
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 12-18-2009, 07:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •