Antonio Bryant?

**DMN** · 08-29-2010, 04:14 PM

What do you guys think? Besides last year his recent stats are good... and even last year they were acceptable for chiefs standards. A big target but I cant say I remember him as too much of a deep threat. And although I want a burner to stretch the field a smart route runner with sure hands could always help.

**yashi** · 08-29-2010, 09:43 PM

Dear god no. He's a gigantic headcase.

**DMN** · 08-30-2010, 08:21 AM

Yeah I wasn't quite sure of the specifics other than he was coming off a knee surgery and in '08 he was worth around 1250 yrds. and 7 TDs... and he is only 29. But I agree that chambers is the stronger option here.

I have optimism in our depth with McC and Urban. I just cant wait for them to show what they are made of.

Ever since finishing 2nd in the Boldin auction I think that haley is looking. Will be interesting to see who comes free after cuts!

**brdempsey69** · 08-30-2010, 01:14 PM

I really believe they already have a playmaker on their roster -- Jeremy Horne.

Don't need Bryant.

**rodu** · 08-30-2010, 02:31 PM

Originally Posted by brdempsey69

I really believe they already have a playmaker on their roster -- Jeremy Horne.

Don't need Bryant.

we just need to hold on to this Horne

**bbacker51** · 08-30-2010, 02:35 PM

He has no knees, kind of important for a Wide Receiver....He was a good player though

**Pro_Angler** · 08-30-2010, 06:32 PM

Originally Posted by DMN

What do you guys think? Besides last year his recent stats are good... and even last year they were acceptable for chiefs standards. A big target but I cant say I remember him as too much of a deep threat. And although I want a burner to stretch the field a smart route runner with sure hands could always help.

The last reciever that we had that was acceptable stats for KC was TG. We should not ever say mediocure is aceptable cause were the chiefs.

**bwilliams** · 08-30-2010, 07:21 PM

Originally Posted by Pro_Angler

The last reciever that we had that was acceptable stats for KC was TG. We should not ever say mediocure is aceptable cause were the chiefs.

2004-2006 Eddie Kennison should hunt you for sport for saying that.

**Pro_Angler** · 08-30-2010, 09:57 PM

i said the last acceptable reciever,,,TG was after Kennison..

**DMN** · 08-30-2010, 11:21 PM

Originally Posted by Pro_Angler

The last reciever that we had that was acceptable stats for KC was TG. We should not ever say mediocure is aceptable cause were the chiefs.

Its just tongue and cheek as to the success we have had in the passing game the last few seasons. I haven't seen horne in action really. I would love for him to make the roster and be a play maker.

**2010chiefs** · 08-30-2010, 11:37 PM

We don't have the time to gamble on a player that's coming off an injury and has allready racked up millions from other teams. Let's work with what we got and not let anything side track us. I like the direction we're going in all aspects except for the QB. Matt Cassel is on my hot seat as far as i'm concerned. He makes me nervous. GO CHIEFS!