What team should be relocated and where?

**Scout200** · 12-08-2010, 05:35 PM

If you had the ability to relocate a NFL team, where would it be and why?

-Scout

**Three7s** · 12-08-2010, 09:40 PM

Originally Posted by Lazeye

How about to oklahoma, they did just get an NBA team not to long ago. And in the ranks of college they are pretty good.

Their market is only big enough for one franchise, and it'd be really bad since the NBA and NFL run at the same time. While the fans would certainly love to have two franchises, I just don't see them being able to fork over the money.

It's a lot like the dilemma we're having right now in KC. With the NBA franchise movement and all.

**honda522** · 12-08-2010, 09:41 PM

Cause there is no team in Hawaii...I say we put the Bills, Browns or Jaguars there..just for the hell of it.

**figcrostic** · 12-08-2010, 11:26 PM

Move the Faders to Alaska

**N TX Dave** · 12-09-2010, 12:29 AM

Originally Posted by figcrostic

Move the Faders to Alaska

I still say about 150 west the ocean is pretty deep out there and they could be with the rest of the sharks, bottom dwellers and scum suckers there.

Of course they could move the Cowboys anywhere and bring the Chiefs back to Dallas where they started and I could then go to all the home games and see the rest on TV

**Chiefster** · 12-09-2010, 12:29 AM

Originally Posted by figcrostic

Move the Faders to Alaska

...And Denver to Hawaii.

**SIC J** · 12-09-2010, 01:26 AM

Originally Posted by Hayvern

Yeah, Jacksonville needs to go to LA, unfortunately, LA does not have any stadiums an NFL franchise can play in. There is a move right now to build a new one, but at the moment, LA is not an option for any franchise. Jacksonville does seem to be a logical move though.

They don't have a stadium because they have not gotten a team to buy yet. From all the articles I have read, they already got the approval to build a new stadium, they just need a team before they start. Thats why nothing has been done yet. If I recall correctly, the Vikings and Chargers contracts are almost up and thats why LA is pursing them the most.

**BoltWalt** · 12-09-2010, 03:11 AM

Relocation should be for hardship reasons only and teams that have been in place for over twenty years should not be moved unless the hardship excuse can be justified. Which I doubt it could be done short of opening the books that all NFL teams seem to be loathe to do.

**Chiefster** · 12-09-2010, 07:05 AM

Originally Posted by BoltWalt

Relocation should be for hardship reasons only and teams that have been in place for over twenty years should not be moved unless the hardship excuse can be justified. Which I doubt it could be done short of opening the books that all NFL teams seem to be loathe to do.

I agree; it was flat out wrong when the Browns owner packed up and moved the team to Baltimore, where the Colts should have been, to become the expansion team known as the Ravens.

**chiefnut** · 12-09-2010, 08:20 AM

send the radrz to the Oke Fanoke swamp and the broncs to Death Valley

**KCMASS** · 12-09-2010, 09:27 AM

The very BEST city to move any NFL team would be San Antonio, TX. No I'm not from there. Someone mentioned Oka. City isn't bad. How about Birmingham, AL.?