If Brodie plays...

[wildcat]

It will be interesting to say the least. With Brodie's arm and Haley's aggressiveness, I could see a much different game plan with Brodie in. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see a play action bomb to Tucker in our first series to catch the Bolts off guard.

Also, just to be clear, I am a converted Matt Cassel fan and I hope he is healthy enough to play Sunday. I am really starting to believe that we finally have our QB of the future in him. I don't think we will necessarily lose this week without him though.

[4everchiefsfan25]

If the Chiefs change their game plan for Brodie Croyle then the Chiefs will lose. Croyle W and L record is 0-9 I think he has all the physical weapons to be a great QB but his football IQ is no where near Matt Cassel's. I think if Brodie throws more then 10 to 15 passes I think the Chiefs should be expecting atleast one INT from him. Just give the ball to Charles and Jones and let them carry the team to victory.

[OPLookn]

I can't believe that people are pointing to Croyle and saying oh well he's 0-9 as a starter but in the same breath saying that Casell is getting to be a great QB. In no way am I saying that Casell is bad, I'll admit it I'm converted from a Casell hater to being a fan.

My point is that Casell sucked behind the same people that Croyle sucked behind. We now have a new people, new attitude and new coordinators. Give Croyle a chance! Has he made some boneheaded mistakes absolutely. But so has Casell behind the team last year and Croyle had the same if not a worse team in front of him when we were bagging on him.

Let's just take a step back, have some faith in our coordinators to use Croyle the way that they believe he should be, go into the dolts house and punch em in the mouth and never let em back up!

[wildcat]

If the Chiefs change their game plan for Brodie Croyle then the Chiefs will lose. Croyle W and L record is 0-9 I think he has all the physical weapons to be a great QB but his football IQ is no where near Matt Cassel's. I think if Brodie throws more then 10 to 15 passes I think the Chiefs should be expecting atleast one INT from him. Just give the ball to Charles and Jones and let them carry the team to victory.

We would have to change the game plan to better suit Brodie's abilities. He is a different QB than Cassel. I'm not saying we should throw the ball 40 times (or even 30+ times, unless we fall behind by a couple of scores), but we can't be one dimensional and we are going to need to take some shots if we want to go into the Bolts house and knock them out of contention.

[Lazeye]

If the Chiefs change their game plan for Brodie Croyle then the Chiefs will lose.

I think our game plan needs to stay just the same. I think who and where we throw to should change some, I mean Brodie can throw it back to KC from Cali if he wanted to. We have a better defense now so if Brodie has one INT I am fine with that as long as he throws atleast two TD's and we run two in as well. I say we win if we can keep Brodie from being sacked.

[Ryfo18]

If Brodie can go in and protect the football, I have no doubt that the Chiefs can win this game. He's not going to have his number called often, but he has a big arm and I think the Chiefs do take some shots downfield with speedster Verran Tucker. If the Chargers are stacking 8 in the box and focusing extra attention on Bowe, it's gonna be Verran's turn to step up. 11 guys can only go so far to covering all of the weapons the Chiefs have.

[4everchiefsfan25]

We would have to change the game plan to better suit Brodie's abilities. He is a different QB than Cassel. I'm not saying we should throw the ball 40 times (or even 30+ times, unless we fall behind by a couple of scores), but we can't be one dimensional and we are going to need to take some shots if we want to go into the Bolts house and knock them out of contention.

There is no reason to change our game plan we have the best running game in the NFL we have the best one two combo so just because Croyle has a better arm there is no way we need to be throwing the ball around. If its not broke don't fix it. People are complaining that we don't run the ball enough but your telling me now that since OUR BACK UP is in, that we should go into San Diego and throw against the number 1 pass defense thats just stupid.

[4everchiefsfan25]

I can't believe that people are pointing to Croyle and saying oh well he's 0-9 as a starter but in the same breath saying that Casell is getting to be a great QB. In no way am I saying that Casell is bad, I'll admit it I'm converted from a Casell hater to being a fan.

My point is that Casell sucked behind the same people that Croyle sucked behind. We now have a new people, new attitude and new coordinators. Give Croyle a chance! Has he made some boneheaded mistakes absolutely. But so has Casell behind the team last year and Croyle had the same if not a worse team in front of him when we were bagging on him.

Let's just take a step back, have some faith in our coordinators to use Croyle the way that they believe he should be, go into the dolts house and punch em in the mouth and never let em back up!

Yeah when Croyle had a worse team than Cassel, Croyle couldn't win a game but Thigbone could win a couple of games and score some points with the same horrible team that Croyle couldn't. Croyle is like glass back there in the pocket once he gets hit he is going to be out for the season just like he has always done. The fan favorite position is always the back up QB, and all these Chief fans were wanting to see what Croyle could do when Cassel wasnt going out there winning games for us, so here you go you get to see a rusty Croyle on the road against San Diego against the number 1 pass defense. I'm a die hard Chief fan but you have to step back and look at the situation and not just be a homer.

[matthewschiefs]

While I do think that Matt Cassel is the starter and the Clear starter I would not be to upset to see Brodie in there. I like Brodie if he is a short time replacement. I don't think that it will hurt us big time. We can win with him so if he does get the start on Sunday witch I really think that he will given the surgery that Cassel just had I don't think it will be the reason that we lose.

[Canada]

Yeah when Croyle had a worse team than Cassel, Croyle couldn't win a game but Thigbone could win a couple of games and score some points with the same horrible team that Croyle couldn't. Croyle is like glass back there in the pocket once he gets hit he is going to be out for the season just like he has always done. The fan favorite position is always the back up QB, and all these Chief fans were wanting to see what Croyle could do when Cassel wasnt going out there winning games for us, so here you go you get to see a rusty Croyle on the road against San Diego against the number 1 pass defense. I'm a die hard Chief fan but you have to step back and look at the situation and not just be a homer.

San Diego is gonna stack 8 in the box to try and shut down the run. Its not out of the question that Croyle can put up 200-250 yards. The only knock anyone has ever had on Croyle is that he is injury prone...how about we dont let him get hit then? Now whats your complaint? He's 0-9? So was the rest of the team during that stretch. Croyle was 0-9 on a team that went 10 for 38. Big surprise.

If I step back and take a look at the situation then I see a team that could win a game with a backup QB that no one has gameplanned for. Croyle knows how to play and what better way to knock them off their gameplan than to have Croyle come out firing? I have heard this bullsh!t "homer" crap for far too long. We are 8-4 with a 2 game lead in the West and are on the verge of finishing off the playoff hopes of SD and OAK this weekend. We have the best rushing offense in the league, our WR has the most TDs in the league, our defense is coming on strong. This isnt being a homer, this is fact. The Chiefs are for real!!