Page 4 of 16 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 157

Thread: Brodie Croyle debate

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    22,845

    Default Brodie Croyle debate

    I'd say it's safe to say this debate is done. Hope all you Cassel haters are enjoying the game.
    At least Brodie played a half of football without being taken off on a stretcher


  2. #31
    Member Since
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kcchiefsfan1982 View Post
    I might have spelled Croyle's first name wrong, but my 2 year old nephew is named Brody...and, no, he wasn't named after Croyle!
    We probably would have been better off with your nephew playing QB.

  3. #32
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Croyle sucks! That is the point of this thread. The D could have played better, obviously, but the O looked like a high school team! You can't put it all on croyle, he didn't play every down of the entire game, but we have all seen over the years that he isn't even a number 2. He isn't even a number 3. The coaches sucked, the players played like they wanted to sit in the hot tub and throw down a few cold ones.

    I think the D played as well as you could have expected them to play against a team with their backs up against the wall and at home!

    The point is the offense did not give the D anything to play for. There was no motivation for the D to play well. They watched the game just as we did, and they saw a horrible offense just like we did!
    The D played a part in the loss, but the reason we lost is our Offense! Score points, inspire the D, don't and it's a tall order to ask the D to keep us in the game!

    We all know our D is young, and young players play more off emotion than vets, if we can get them believing they have a chance to win they are going to play more inspired football.
    They knew and we knew we had no chance with croyle under center. Croyle sucks and nobody can argue that point. We need Cassel to stand any sort of chance.

  4. #33
    Member Since
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chief4Ever&Ever View Post
    Croyle sucks! That is the point of this thread. The D could have played better, obviously, but the O looked like a high school team! You can't put it all on croyle, he didn't play every down of the entire game, but we have all seen over the years that he isn't even a number 2. He isn't even a number 3. The coaches sucked, the players played like they wanted to sit in the hot tub and throw down a few cold ones.

    I think the D played as well as you could have expected them to play against a team with their backs up against the wall and at home!

    The point is the offense did not give the D anything to play for. There was no motivation for the D to play well. They watched the game just as we did, and they saw a horrible offense just like we did!
    The D played a part in the loss, but the reason we lost is our Offense! Score points, inspire the D, don't and it's a tall order to ask the D to keep us in the game!

    We all know our D is young, and young players play more off emotion than vets, if we can get them believing they have a chance to win they are going to play more inspired football.
    They knew and we knew we had no chance with croyle under center. Croyle sucks and nobody can argue that point. We need Cassel to stand any sort of chance.
    It is kind of hard to play D at a high level for 40 mins of a game. They never could get off the field.

  5. #34
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 4everchiefsfan25 View Post
    It is kind of hard to play D at a high level for 40 mins of a game. They never could get off the field.
    Exactly! They didn't have much of a chance! Being tired from playing almost the entire game, against one of the best offenses in the league, and the uninspired play of the offense, our D did not get much hlep.

  6. #35
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ventura, Ca.
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GarH View Post
    Croyle is not a very good back-up QB and is as fragile as glass, but there were at least 16 to 17 other players that were part of the reason we lost also. Our defense was bad from the start. Sure they were on the field too long, but they were getting beat from the start. Both of their lines were beating our lines. We couldn't run and they could. There is no excuse for letting San Diego run on you.

    There's a whole lot of Chiefs players that need to step it back up if they want to win the West. That said we do need to get someone better than Croyle,
    Well let's see, what good came out of the game yesterday. I know how so many of us like to stay positive.

    Let's see.... ummmm..... wait there's.....

    I got nothin


    Are you man enough? Eric Berry? Apparently Not!

  7. #36
    Member Since
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayvern View Post
    Well let's see, what good came out of the game yesterday. I know how so many of us like to stay positive.

    Let's see.... ummmm..... wait there's.....

    I got nothin

    There is one positive that was a beautiful INT Berry got. What concentration on his part. Maybe Bowe can take some lessons from Berry lol.

  8. #37
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    521

    Default

    Croyle is yet another horrible QB draft pick over the years! Anyone remember Mike Elkins, Matt Blundin? The list goes on. Aside from Mike Livingston, who was "decent" not great by any means, that was the only draft pick worth mentioning. Maybe Roger Staubach, but that was a Navy thing.

    Checkout this YouTube link about KC QB picks over the years. Pretty cool.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rljGXkIc_HY"]YouTube - Chiefs QB Draft History[/ame]
    KC Chiefs fan since 1965!
    Home of the Middle East! Istanbul Club.

  9. #38
    Member Since
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KCMASS View Post
    Croyle is yet another horrible QB draft pick over the years! Anyone remember Mike Elkins, Matt Blundin? The list goes on. Aside from Mike Livingston, who was "decent" not great by any means, that was the only draft pick worth mentioning. Maybe Roger Staubach, but that was a Navy thing.

    Checkout this YouTube link about KC QB picks over the years. Pretty cool.

    I guess the only defense I have for the Chiefs is that there really wasn't any great QB's in the 06 draft. Unless you think Jay Cutler is a great QB then there is nobody.

  10. #39
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    22,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayvern View Post
    Well let's see, what good came out of the game yesterday. I know how so many of us like to stay positive.

    Let's see.... ummmm..... wait there's.....

    I got nothin
    They came out of the game healthy. That's all I got.


  11. #40
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hayvern View Post
    Well let's see, what good came out of the game yesterday. I know how so many of us like to stay positive.

    Let's see.... ummmm..... wait there's.....

    I got nothin
    I got to drink a lot of beer!! I mean A LOT!!
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

Page 4 of 16 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. brodie croyle
    By jacko58 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-23-2010, 09:17 PM
  2. Brodie Croyle 2nd string?!?!?!
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-15-2009, 02:51 PM
  3. will brodie croyle be cut
    By marloweopatchiefs in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 02-25-2009, 08:22 PM
  4. Brodie Croyle !
    By YZILLA in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-24-2007, 03:01 AM
  5. Brodie Croyle
    By gobrodie in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 09-20-2006, 02:29 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •