Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: D. Hall might leave?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default D. Hall might leave?


    0 Not allowed!
    D'Angelo Hall and Petrino aren't getting along the rumor mill states. Hall might be on his way out in Atlanta. We sure could use a quality CB like him in our D. It would be nice to have another shut-down corner in the AFC West that isn't playing for the Donks.

    Would we attempt to get him if he available?
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,841
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    That would be a huge pick-up for the Chiefs.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The 49ers own my heart, but the Chiefs will always hold a better than neutral spot for giving my favorite player a place to leave with grace...

    Resident Comedian/Statistician/Researcher/Diplomat

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois... No longer .. Finally back home Blue Springs MO
    Posts
    2,417
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    That would be a great pickup .. but .. he will prolly end up in Dallas or Oakland. But never no.

    Go Chiefs




  4. #4
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by bryonc View Post
    That would be a great pickup .. but .. he will prolly end up in Dallas or Oakland. But never no.

    Go Chiefs
    Sure hope not!
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    14,295
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 30

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I would highly doubt that we would make a run at him. We have other more pressing needs and would not get involved in a bidding war for a low character guy. Just my opinion.


  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    486
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Good pickup, but what our desicion makers will look at is we already have Surtain and Law and say we dont need another corner. Theyre good but old.

    Welcome to Arrowhead

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by admin View Post
    I would highly doubt that we would make a run at him. We have other more pressing needs and would not get involved in a bidding war for a low character guy. Just my opinion.
    Low character agreed! Highly talented extremely! IMO

    I do agreed with more pressing needs also. WOuld be nice though to have a player like that compliment or D on the field IMO.
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,141
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 30
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I'm not sure if there is something more to the low-character implications, than last weekend, or not.

    Having said that, I feel that his actions last weekend were certainly justifiable. Not excusing what he cost the team, just saying that if one looks at what happened, it sure seems like he was being attacked by the officiating.

    Fisrt, he was flagged for unneccessary roughness, because he jammed a reciever at the line. He didn't hit him in the face, nor anything else that is illegal. It was a phantom call. It was a bad call.

    Then, on the very next play, he and Steve Smith were "jawing" back and fourth. Nothing physical, just some trash-talk, by both players. The officials threw a flag against Hall. Just Hall. Two players, doing the exact same thing, which isn't illegal, and the ref decided to penalize Hall again.

    I believe that the official took something that Hall did earlier, personally, then got his revengeon Hall.

    After that, sure, Hall got carried away. In all of my days watching any sports, I have never seen officials make such obviously biased calls against one, inparticular, player, on successive plays.

    That is why I am somewhat sympathetic to Halls situation. He was attacked by an official, on two consecutive plays.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,141
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 30
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Well, Tim Duncan was getting cheated by an officail a while back.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    486
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    I'm not sure if there is something more to the low-character implications, than last weekend, or not.

    Having said that, I feel that his actions last weekend were certainly justifiable. Not excusing what he cost the team, just saying that if one looks at what happened, it sure seems like he was being attacked by the officiating.

    Fisrt, he was flagged for unneccessary roughness, because he jammed a reciever at the line. He didn't hit him in the face, nor anything else that is illegal. It was a phantom call. It was a bad call.

    Then, on the very next play, he and Steve Smith were "jawing" back and fourth. Nothing physical, just some trash-talk, by both players. The officials threw a flag against Hall. Just Hall. Two players, doing the exact same thing, which isn't illegal, and the ref decided to penalize Hall again.

    I believe that the official took something that Hall did earlier, personally, then got his revengeon Hall.

    After that, sure, Hall got carried away. In all of my days watching any sports, I have never seen officials make such obviously biased calls against one, inparticular, player, on successive plays.

    That is why I am somewhat sympathetic to Halls situation. He was attacked by an official, on two consecutive plays.
    He would fit in well here cuz it seems like the Chiefs are always gtting BS calls. Defensive holding on run play? Tony G pass interference on a screen play? What is tee deal with those calls?

    Welcome to Arrowhead

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •