Everyone we were interested in is still there. I wonder who it will be!
Everyone we were interested in is still there. I wonder who it will be!
should be an improvement over jackson. or could be they are going to move dorsey to NT and bailey replaces him at DE
I have to say I am very confused by this pick...
I can only think that they want to move dorsey. I have heard coaches go on record saying dorsey is strong enough to play NT. So that is the only thing I can think. They must be trying to produce pressure with the D line.
My guess is Dorsey to NT.
The Chiefs are Back!
Just because we draft someone in the 3rd rd doesn't mean there are any plans for him to take over a starting spot.
we still have edwards and smith who were both very serviceable. So as much I wanted a vince wilfork... I think it would have been phil taylor. that said Bailey looks like a freak, reminds me of justin tuck.
Gilberry rushes the passer well ( even if it means ignoring his responsibilities ), but only managed 23 tackles in his play time vs Jackson's 31 in 4 less games and his second year. Part of this is because he's not playing 2 gaps like he is expected to and instead likes to shoot gaps. That act gets him some sacks, but makes him a liability for the defensive scheme as a whole. In other words, as a 3-4 DE, Jackson is already better than Gilberry, but fans see the sack total and don't understand the scheme & responsibilities.
Bailey is only 285 and I wonder about his strength in a 5 tech - I think KC tries to stand him up at OLB ( he use to play LB fyi ).
Anyhow, this should be Jackson's year to show what kind of 3-4 DE he's going to be in the NFL. With KC's 3-4, you should see him making tackles ( not sacks so much ), so beyond watching the games, that stat shooting up would be a good indicator of success.
...and we have a new Allen at DE!! :)
The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.
Bookmarks