Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Chief's Worked out Jason Snelling.

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Chief's Worked out Jason Snelling.


    0 Not allowed!
    Saw this on NFL.com:

    Scout.com, citing a source with knowledge of the situation, reported that Snelling worked out for the Chiefs on Wednesday.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,582
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I wonder why we would do this, except for depth. Maybe. Charles, Jones, McClain, McCluster, Cox, Castille, Battle, and Snelling?

    Seems like a lot.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    overland park ks
    Posts
    1,825
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by josh1971 View Post
    I wonder why we would do this, except for depth. Maybe. Charles, Jones, McClain, McCluster, Cox, Castille, Battle, and Snelling?

    Seems like a lot.
    LOL yeah that's a lot

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Topeka< KS
    Posts
    2,196
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 180
    Given: 56

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I guess Pioli isn't satisfied with the #1 rushing attack in the NFL. He wants to be #0!

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,582
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    LOL yeah that's a lot
    And I forgot Tervaris (Sp?) Johnson and Shane Bannon. I guess Castille is not with us any longer.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I now retract this post because I realized that the chiefs announced on Wednessday that they signed McClain. My guess is that they targeted snelling as well, as an inside runner just in case they didn't lock up McClain.

    I can't see them sign another RB as well, I just think they were bringin him in before they knew they locked in McClain.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    13,953
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 77
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrudi View Post
    I now retract this post because I realized that the chiefs announced on Wednessday that they signed McClain. My guess is that they targeted snelling as well, as an inside runner just in case they didn't lock up McClain.

    I can't see them sign another RB as well, I just think they were bringin him in before they knew they locked in McClain.
    I also think this is what happened.


  8. #8
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    224
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrudi View Post
    I now retract this post because I realized that the chiefs announced on Wednessday that they signed McClain. My guess is that they targeted snelling as well, as an inside runner just in case they didn't lock up McClain.

    I can't see them sign another RB as well, I just think they were bringin him in before they knew they locked in McClain.
    That is what happened. I can't remember where I read it but Snelling came in on Wednesday and it was reported after meeting with him they decided on McLain instead.

Similar Threads

  1. Tried to trade for Basket, Worked out Pope
    By imcorrect in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-16-2009, 03:09 AM
  2. Some Rich Chief's Should Do This.
    By spiman in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-14-2008, 10:08 AM
  3. Predictable Chief's?
    By kenny1937 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-21-2006, 02:24 AM
  4. Arizona, Look Out, Here Comes The CHIEF'S!
    By kenny1937 in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-13-2006, 12:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •