Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: 30 Million under the cap

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    691

    Default 30 Million under the cap

    If that is true, as is reported. Doesn't that say that this ownership is ok with being average? We won 10 last year, but we all know there were problems that needed addressed. But yet we didn't. Why is that? I've been watching the Cincinnati Bungles do this for 20 years. Just be good enough to stay close. Have a good year or two, and the sheepole will keep coming in to buy tickets, beer and merchandise. But not really dedicated to winning. Are we dedicated to winning? We used to be, but are we still? Mr. Hunt, are you really interesting in winning?

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Topeka< KS
    Posts
    11,796

    Default

    I've been hearing that the Chiefs have between 30 and 35 million in cap space since the preseason started. That was before we signed Tamba Hali for $12 million per year and before we signed Brandon Flowers to $10 million per year. That's $22 million right there. Does anyone have a current accurate figure for total salary? I tried to google it, but most of the figures are out of date. According to TraditionSportsOnLine.com the Current Salary cap space is only $12,610,000, based on a total salary of $107,390,000. That's a far cry from $30 million.

    I think many of you don't really understand Cap space and think just because we have X amount of dollars we shold spend it. Here are some factors you may not be considering.

    1) There are several cap charges that aren’t reflected in that number. These include players who reach an injury settlement, players who file injury grievances, vested veterans who are terminated and entitled to termination pay, and incentives that a club anticipates a player will earn even though the NFL has deemed the incentive “unlikely to be earned” based on the previous season. All are hidden costs that clubs have to account for in the salary cap, making it impossible to determine an exact number.

    2) Teams must also keep a reserve to sign replacements should a player be placed on injured reserve or be released or traded. Charles, Berry and Moeaki all still get paid this year. If the Chiefs sign a player or make a lopsided trade to get fill-in players for any of these guys, they will get paid from this years cap space. If we sign a replacement kicker for Ryan Succop we have to pay both of them (even though kickers don't get paid much.)

    3) A portion of cap space must be reserved to sign players to extensions before they become free agents. That's what we did with Hali and Flowers this year.

    4)Getting into a bidding war just becuase you have the money can cripple your team if you overpay for a player and he underperforms. He becomes untradeable and it ties up money the team can use to fill other needs.

    5) FAs are not required to sign with the higest bidder. Many players will take less money to sign with a team in a large market (because they can more than make up the loss in endorsements), sign with a team that they think is more likely to win a Super Bowl, or sign with a team that fits their skillset, so they can perform better and increase their future value.

    Just because the Chiefs don't sign a big name FA doesn't necessarily mean they weren't willing to pay for him. That player may not have wanted to play for the Chiefs.

    6) Rollover! This is big. Teams that stay under the salary cap this year can roll that money over to use (next year only) to exceed the cap. This will put the Chiefs in a postion to pay more than for a player than teams who are right at the cap.

    Also keep in mind that there is a difference between Salary cap and budget. Just because the Chiefs are allowed to spend X number of dollars doesn't mean they have X number of dollars to spend. This is a big problem with smaller market teams who don't make nearly as much money in the areas that are not revenue shared (like parking, concessions, some merchandising, etc.) Remember the Chiefs exist to make a profit for the owner. Entertaining the fans is only a means to that end.

    In 2 years the Chiefs will be forced to spend 99% of the Salay cap. If they don't the difference will go directly to the NFLPA and redistributed among the players. So next year will be the year to go after the big names, becuase it will be a level playing field after that. The Rollover from this year to next could put the chiefs in a great position to land the big names.

  3. #12
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Great post Topeka!

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    Pioli is doing the same thing that he did with the Pats. They did not build by going out getting high price tallent. They made there team through the draft and once they got to the point they were winning superbowls they started really going out to sign some big name high price talent. They picked and chose who they wanted in the free agent market. It went faster with the pats because they had more talent then we did when they started.
    Yeah but the difference is they had Tom Brady. I'm not saying go out and sell the farm but at least make an effort to fill some holes.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC touchdown View Post
    We didnt get any impact FA the past 3 years and look how that is working out this year
    3 years, yet you waited until this season to come here and complain about who we did pick up.

    Quote Originally Posted by KC touchdown View Post
    It also helps when you try to build a team through the draft is to ACTUALLY HAVE GOOD DRAFT PICKS Pioli.
    No w we have no had any good draft picks!! Berry, Moeaki, McCluster just off the top of my head. I have read enough of your posts to know that no matter what happens you will disagree with it. Im not sure why you hate every single thing the Chiefs do, I just see that you do.
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC touchdown View Post
    in 3 years you can name 3 pretty good draft picks....

    King carl did better than that
    That's how it works when players have four or five years to make their cases, as opposed to judging a draft class in three games.


  7. #16
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    Pioli is doing the same thing that he did with the Pats. They did not build by going out getting high price tallent. They made there team through the draft and once they got to the point they were winning superbowls they started really going out to sign some big name high price talent. They picked and chose who they wanted in the free agent market. It went faster with the pats because they had more talent then we did when they started.
    That's not exactly right. 11 of the 22 Pats in the 2001 SB were free agents. Pats built by going after cheap FAs and drafting well. Look at the past ten champs:

    2001 - Pats build by signing cheap FAs and draft
    2002 - Bucs sign several key vets (Johnsons, Rice) to add to Dungy's defensive stalwarts
    2003 - Pats add guys like Rodney Harrison and keep drafting well
    2004 - Pats add guys like Dillon and keep drafting well
    2005 - Steelers are almost all homegrown
    2006 - Colts are almost all homegrown
    2007 - Giants are heavily free agent built
    2008 - Steelers are almost all homegrown
    2009 - Saints are heavily free agent built
    2010 - Packers are almost all homegrown

    There's no one way to build a champion for either small amrket or big market teams. You can do it by drafting, by FA, or by both.

    That said, none of the ten teams above were $30M under the cap. Most were at or near the cap. Our owner is just being cheap. There was no reason to cut Waters, Edwards, or Smith this offseason except for cheapness.

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Location
    N. Kansas City
    Posts
    147

    Default

    I hurd on 810 sports radio,They though Clark Hunt is being so cheap,because he put in that 125mill. to biuld the stadium and now trying to recoop the money ,that he put into it.Makes alot of since.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC touchdown View Post
    in 3 years you can name 3 pretty good draft picks....

    King carl did better than that.


    I hate most of what they have done yes. Give Matt cassel at that time more money than everyone except peyton manning (still makes more than rodgers rivers etc..) Draft Tyson jackson, give flowers top 5 cb money, trade tony g, btw we did give our second round pick for cassel, ABSOLUTELY NO FA TALENT OR PURSUIT, Drafting baldwin with the possibility of going 0-16.

    Yes I have hated what they have done
    Do I have to hold your hand and walk you through all our good draft picks. My point is that it would not matter what was done, you would complain about it. Like tony G leaving...he wanted to go...yet you blame management. Its ridiculous, if we hadnt drafted Baldwin Im sure you would be on here complaining about how we didnt get a WR. you just second guess every decision that is made and then when we have a bad season, you show up telling everyone how right you are.

    Good Draft Picks
    Eric Berry
    Dexter McCluster
    Jon Asamoa
    Tony Moeaki
    Kendrick Lewis
    Justin Houston
    Rodney Hudson


    Im sure you dont like them, but most of them are starting right now.
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kckidd8870 View Post
    I hurd on 810 sports radio,They though Clark Hunt is being so cheap,because he put in that 125mill. to biuld the stadium and now trying to recoop the money ,that he put into it.Makes alot of since.
    That may be true, but it's still inexcusible. There isn't a whole lot of difference between that and deliberately tanking.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Chiefs sign Thomas Jones to 2 year, $5 million deal!
    By Ryfo18 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-13-2010, 08:49 AM
  2. Royals sign Ankiel to a one year 3.25 million dolllar deal
    By kilobytes in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2010, 04:56 PM
  3. Still have $7 Million to spend
    By imcorrect in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-14-2009, 09:53 PM
  4. Jay Cutler...6 years 48 million...
    By Guru in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-22-2006, 10:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •