Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 54

Thread: Chiefs should trade for peyton manning

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    624
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Default Chiefs should trade for peyton manning


    0 Not allowed!
    AFter the season if stanzi doesn't work out.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    679
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 2

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    We need to beef up our O-line and D-line with this draft. Not another QB. Let's see what Stanzi can do now so that we can maybe consider a QB.

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    7
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I agree. Enough with getting others table scraps. Peyton, although a incredible QB, now has a very big mark on his back. We take him, and get 1 maybe two out of him, he gets cranked, and thats it. We develop what we have, or trade for a good draft pick. Ever wonder how Brady Quinn would have done had Cleveland not scooped us?

    As Jesse Jackson would say
    "Keep Hope Alive!!" I know ... Cheese!

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    3,004
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 121
    Given: 4

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I would rather give up a bunch and trade up with Indy for Andrew Luck.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,310
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Seek View Post
    I would rather give up a bunch and trade up with Indy for Andrew Luck.
    After watching a few games and listening to people talk about the Oregon vs Stanford game I just don't know about Luck. He might be a great QB but what I saw isn't worth trading the farm for one pick. Would I like to have him? Yes, but not at the cost of what it would take to get him.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by OPLookn View Post
    After watching a few games and listening to people talk about the Oregon vs Stanford game I just don't know about Luck. He might be a great QB but what I saw isn't worth trading the farm for one pick. Would I like to have him? Yes, but not at the cost of what it would take to get him.
    I watched part of the Oregon vs Stanford game, and Luck was not the reason they lost that game.

    Oregon ran all over Stanford like the Broncos did the chiefs, LaMicheal James had like 3 TD's! and the Duck's averaged like 7yds a play! Standford didn't have an answer to Oregon's Offense, and the INT of luck's that I saw him throw, was because a Freshman TE tipped up the ball to a LB.

    I'm not saying we are going to get him, and I do think it would take a lot to trade up to get him (I think the only team that will trade that pick would be St. Louis)

    I'm just saying from what I watched of that game, they didn't loose because of Luck.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,310
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrudi View Post
    I watched part of the Oregon vs Stanford game, and Luck was not the reason they lost that game.

    Oregon ran all over Stanford like the Broncos did the chiefs, LaMicheal James had like 3 TD's! and the Duck's averaged like 7yds a play! Standford didn't have an answer to Oregon's Offense, and the INT of luck's that I saw him throw, was because a Freshman TE tipped up the ball to a LB.

    I'm not saying we are going to get him, and I do think it would take a lot to trade up to get him (I think the only team that will trade that pick would be St. Louis)

    I'm just saying from what I watched of that game, they didn't loose because of Luck.
    That's interesting, hadn't heard that kind of perspective. Still haven't watched the game and now I probably won't get the chance to.

    Even if Luck is the stud everyone makes him out to be it's become apparent that while we've got some first stringers are that are pretty darn good (or have the potential to be) we have first string holes and the need for talented backups. Just don't want to trade away a couple firsts, one or two seconds and a third to get Luck. I'm thinking that's about what it'd take with the Luck frenzy that's going on.

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by OPLookn View Post
    That's interesting, hadn't heard that kind of perspective. Still haven't watched the game and now I probably won't get the chance to.

    Even if Luck is the stud everyone makes him out to be it's become apparent that while we've got some first stringers are that are pretty darn good (or have the potential to be) we have first string holes and the need for talented backups. Just don't want to trade away a couple firsts, one or two seconds and a third to get Luck. I'm thinking that's about what it'd take with the Luck frenzy that's going on.

    Heck it might take more than that; remember the ATL trade to get Julio Jones: 2011 and 2012 first round picks, a 2011 second round pick and both 2011 and 2012 fourth round picks.

    And that was to move to pick #5 I think....

    So with the #1 you might be looking at like swapping this years first rounder, next years first, and like 2 second rounders, or possibly tossing on a 3rd too.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pauls Valley, Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,162
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Pioli would not give up so many picks for Luck. He would trade back before moving up. Lets see what Palko and Stanzi can give us first. What do we have to lose? The afc west sucks and no matter who wins it won't get past the first round. IMO..

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by okikcfan View Post
    Pioli would not give up so many picks for Luck. He would trade back before moving up. Lets see what Palko and Stanzi can give us first. What do we have to lose? The afc west sucks and no matter who wins it won't get past the first round. IMO..
    I agree, I wasn't saying I thought we would, it's not Pioli's M.O.

    Just saying it will take a lot for any team to move up there to get him.

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    3,004
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 121
    Given: 4

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrudi View Post
    I agree, I wasn't saying I thought we would, it's not Pioli's M.O.

    Just saying it will take a lot for any team to move up there to get him.
    I am not suggesting we do that, I am just saying I would rather do that than trade for Manning. He may be retired as it is and just does not know it.

    it is really going to suck having Luck in Indy.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Peyton Manning
    By kenny1937 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-31-2012, 12:12 AM
  2. Peyton Manning Madman Video
    By Connie Jo in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-24-2010, 08:56 PM
  3. Peyton Manning vs. Kansas City Chiefs
    By KristofLaw in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-09-2010, 04:01 PM
  4. This is sooooo Peyton Manning
    By Guru in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-03-2007, 01:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •