Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Barkley To Stay At Usc!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Barkley To Stay At Usc!


    0 Not allowed!
    Just announced @ 3pm

    might affect the QB's in this draft. Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    105
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 6

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I think this probably eliminates any chance of us taking a qb in the first round.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I think you are probably right as well.

    I was hoping that with Barkley being in the mix that it might allow RG3 to drop a bit closer to us grabbing him, but looks like now RG3 will move up further to the #2QB spot behind Luck.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Santiago de Chile
    Posts
    262
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 1

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    If Rams can get #1 pick, maybe we can trade up to get Luck, otherwise I don't think it's worth to waste a first rounder in a mediocre QB (we already have one under contract).
    The best Chilean fan.
    Follow me on twitter @ChileanChief

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by pojote View Post
    If Rams can get #1 pick, maybe we can trade up to get Luck, otherwise I don't think it's worth to waste a first rounder in a mediocre QB (we already have one under contract).
    I've been set on the idea that we could have had RG3 fall to us, but I agree with you now.

    I don't think I would want Jones, and Maybe we can look at Tannehill in the 2nd round or something.

    Now I'm looking at the idea that of course O-line, and the idea the Trent Richardson may be a possibility. At first I thought it was crazy, but then I thought, wow could you imagine Richardson and Charles in the Backfield.

    We could grab a RT or OG in round 2 or 3, with Orton and Cassel, we are going to need a good run game, and Richardson could give us that.

    Never know though...

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    196
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Nick Foles. He's only the second QB in the history of the PAC-10 to throw for 10,000 yards in 3 seasons.
    Last edited by GarH; 12-22-2011 at 05:47 PM.
    The Chiefs are Back!

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,310
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrudi View Post
    I've been set on the idea that we could have had RG3 fall to us, but I agree with you now.

    I don't think I would want Jones, and Maybe we can look at Tannehill in the 2nd round or something.

    Now I'm looking at the idea that of course O-line, and the idea the Trent Richardson may be a possibility. At first I thought it was crazy, but then I thought, wow could you imagine Richardson and Charles in the Backfield.

    We could grab a RT or OG in round 2 or 3, with Orton and Cassel, we are going to need a good run game, and Richardson could give us that.

    Never know though...
    You've been reading WalterFootball to much.

    Laundry Jones might just send his first paycheck to Barkley as his draft stock just went up a ton. Unfortunately I think that Khalil will come back now too because he sees the opportunity to compete for a championship and he was on the fence before.

    That means that Martin will be the first OT taken, Luck and RG3 will be gone by the time we pick too. So I'd have to agree with you when you said someone like Trent Richardson(RB), David DeCastro(G) or that we trade down two or three times and take Ta'amu with a very late 1st or an early 2nd.

    Or we can just have San Diego and Denver lose this weekend and crush both Oakland this week and Denver next week. Then march on to the Super Bowl....hey a guy can dream!

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    3,597
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 336
    Given: 348

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by OPLookn View Post
    Or we can just have San Diego and Denver lose this weekend and crush both Oakland this week and Denver next week. Then march on to the Super Bowl.
    That sounds like a good idea! I'd rather be worrying about the playoffs than the draft.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Isn't it crazy how 1 player can change a draft so much?

    I'm really stunned now as to what we might do. I think I also like the idea of trading back to get more picks.

    Wouldn't mind: Richardson, Decastro, or Hightower (remember the last Alabama LB we had?? he** yeah!)

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,854
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 420
    Given: 78

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Not surprised. He will now have a shot at winning a BCS title.
    ​BAN ROY


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Well thats one way to stay cool
    By Vanilla Garilla in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-23-2009, 04:20 AM
  2. Gonzo to stay in KC!!!!!
    By Drunker Hillbilly in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 06:23 AM
  3. Stay away Favre
    By bigpoppachief in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 05:01 PM
  4. Stay or go
    By luv in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 07:11 AM
  5. Charles Barkley just said football players are...
    By hermhater in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-30-2007, 02:07 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •