Originally Posted by
chief31
I think Peyton would be an ideal fit with JC.
The type of offense Manning runs leaves the running game as the compliment, and change-of-pace.
And, to have a guy as quick as JC in a "surprise" kind of role would be exceptionally effective, I think.
You get defenses on their heels, delaying their reaction to running plays, and Charles will be behind the defense before they even figure out that Peyton doesn't have the football.
I think Charles would do better in that role than even an Adrian Peterson could.
It is a pipe-dream. But this offense could become a complete nightmare to defend, if Manning were at the helm.
There is just no way that defenses could be prepared for a running play if he were on the field.
That makes perfect sense, but only if Manning's arm fully recovers and at this point that doesn't look likely.
My concern is that if Peyton can't throw the ball over 20 yards than defenses will be able to sit on the short routes and play closer to the line of scrimmage which would actually make it harder to run the ball.
Of course, one of the reasons Manning has been so good is that he gets rid of the ball so quickly, but if he doesn't have any "zip" on the ball, it will give the defenses just a hair more time to react and that could be a big problem.
I would be 100% in favor of picking up Manning if his recovery was going better or if we knew he would be back to full strength by August. It just seems like too much of a risk right now.
We don't have to have an elite QB (although it would certainly be nice to) for this team to be successful and Manning definitely would not be a "long term" solution. What if he suffers a season ending injury in game 3 or 4? (I know, it could happen to any QB.) Then we are back to square one with Cassel starting (if we didn't release him) and no quality back-up.
***Official Chiefs Crowd Game Thread Starter***
This space is reserved for something that has nothing whatsoever to do with MatthewsChiefs. (Whoever THAT is!)
Bookmarks