Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: Stanford Routt

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Cool Stanford Routt


    0 Not allowed!
    NFL Network is reporting Routt has agreed to a 3 year deal with the Chiefs


  2. #2
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    overland park ks
    Posts
    1,825
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Yeah we got a great deal three-year, $19.6 million. Does that mean Carr is going bye bye???

    Stanford Routt To The Chiefs On Three-Year Deal - Arrowhead Pride

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Dec 2008
    Location
    kcmo
    Posts
    1,024
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 66
    Given: 1

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    i just read it on cbssportsline as well. i still woukd rather have carr so i hope we sign carr longterm as well. i think we might cuz we only signed routt to a three year deal. carr is just getting to his prime. think it would be foolish toet him go. now im nervous that we going to looose him.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Lake Ozark, MO
    Posts
    1,763
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 41
    Given: 3

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    Yeah we got a great deal three-year, $19.6 million. Does that mean Carr is going bye bye???

    Stanford Routt To The Chiefs On Three-Year Deal - Arrowhead Pride
    Looks like it, been reading that carl will be unwilling to spend the money other teams are gonna throw at him i would rather have liked to keep the brandons....

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lewisville, TX (Dallas)
    Posts
    1,192
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 30
    Given: 22

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Maybe Carr and/or his agent gave the impression he did not want to stay here not saying he did but you never know. Maybe he wanted to go to a limelight town you know one with more nightlife.
    I think the franchise tag will go on 82 now because we now know who we can afford to lose and if we don't sign Carr we have a replacement unlike if we lost Bowe.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,373
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 332
    Given: 71

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I think that if we can get Carr resigned that our Defense will be in the top 5 next year after this. I hope to get it done.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Neosho, Mo.
    Posts
    310
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    come one pioli bring back carr, i say if anything we need to lock bowe to a long term deal and slap the tag on carr. And i believe it could happen we didn't spend alot on routt. Wow never seen the chiefs as the first to sign a free agent right when the market opened

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Jun 2006
    Location
    betwwen lost and nowhere,southcentral ks.
    Posts
    1,258
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    cant see pioli signing carr now. thats alot of cash tied up on cb`s.
    i guess dreaming tag carr,throw in a 2nd to rams for 2nd pick in draft. a new qb!
    i can remember what a chief super bowl team looks like! ......

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Topeka< KS
    Posts
    2,195
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 180
    Given: 56

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    That's "only" $6.5 million per year, so they still have plenty of room to sign Carr. My guess is that that is what they will try to do. If Carr gets a ridiculously high offer from another team (and he might) then the Chiefs can let him walk. They always have the option of extending Routt's deal if they lose Carr, and if they can keep him then they don't have too much money tied up in Routt.

    If they do lose Carr, then they have even more cap space to work with than they did before!

    Good job, Scott!
    Last edited by TopekaRoy; 02-20-2012 at 02:10 PM.
    ***Official Chiefs Crowd Game Thread Starter***

    Originally Posted by Name Withheld
    I don't think anything that's what wrong is nearly Smiths Falls we have no offense of line I think the coaches are free to call certain place I think he would absolutely do better with a different office of coordinator

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,499
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34
    Given: 38

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    The bad part of becoming a good team is now we may loose players we want to keep. It's a good insurance policy if Carr does end up leaving.

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Chiefs Interested in Stanford Rout...A sign Carr may be out?
    By Jrudi in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 02-20-2012, 04:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •