Originally Posted by
My Man Orton
Look I hate to be a negative nancy here but why would we want a TE who did not play at all last year?
By your logic why would we want a QB who did not play last year?
Originally Posted by
My Man Orton
His numbers have declined every year...
Actually they have gone up every year.
'08 8.77 yards per catch, 1 TD for every 11 catches
'09 8.88 ypc, 1 TD for every 7.29 catches
'10 9.75 ypc, 1 TD for every 31 catches
Except for the number of TDs in 2010, his yards per catch and his TDs per catch went up every year. Do you not understand statistics or is math, in general confusing for you?
Originally Posted by
My Man Orton
So let me get this straight, someone who did NOT played the entire 2011 season is not injury prone? Im sorry im just trying to wrap my head around this one
One injury is not injury prone. How long he was out is irrelevant.
Prone [prohn] having a natural inclination or tendency toward something; liable (source)
If having one injury makes you "injury prone" then every football player who has ever had any injury (including Peyton Manning) is, by your definition "injury prone."
Originally Posted by
My Man Orton
Ah I see now, it wasnt serious. He just missed an entire year but hes fine
Again, using your logic, we shouldn't even think about signing Peyton Maning because he "missed an entire year." (I agree with this, by the way)
Originally Posted by
My Man Orton
He didnt play the whole 2011 season, how is he low risk?
Well, he is no more of a risk than Manning is.
My Man Orton, I will no longer respond to your posts. You have made it perfectly clear that you do not understand math, English, or logic. Why bother?
***Official Chiefs Crowd Game Thread Starter***
This space is reserved for something that has nothing whatsoever to do with MatthewsChiefs. (Whoever THAT is!)
Bookmarks