View Poll Results: Would removing the extra point be a good thing?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    0 0%
  • No

    23 100.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Remove the Extra Point?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default Remove the Extra Point?

    Would it be a good thing if the Extra Point after a Touchdown would be removed? And a touchdown was automatically 7 points.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    change for the sake of change is not good. change the rule about breaking the plane of the goal line to come down in the endzone like it used to be, start allowing defensive backs to defend, stop calling roughing on any lineman who breathes on a QB, but not the x-point.
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    9,803

    Default

    No way. Blocked or missed extra points often have a HUGE impact on a game.

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
    You dont watch chiefs games live?

    Only if it's a home game and I'm at Arrowhead. Otherwise, I ALWAYS watch it an hour or two later to avoid the commercials.

    It's "live" to me.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefs777 View Post
    Only if it's a home game and I'm at Arrowhead. Otherwise, I ALWAYS watch it an hour or two later to avoid the commercials.

    It's "live" to me.
    OH ok i thought you meant like the next day or something. I understand that. Although I like watching them fully live.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    overland park ks
    Posts
    1,825

    Default

    I think they should go the other direction, instead of just extra point or two point conversion and a third option, you can have you kicker try a 55 yard FG if you make it you get 3 points but if you miss it's a turnover on downs.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    I think they should go the other direction, instead of just extra point or two point conversion and a third option, you can have you kicker try a 55 yard FG if you make it you get 3 points but if you miss it's a turnover on downs.
    that would be interesting. especially with a kicker as good as Succop

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Topeka< KS
    Posts
    11,796

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by figcrostic View Post
    I think they should go the other direction, instead of just extra point or two point conversion and a third option, you can have you kicker try a 55 yard FG if you make it you get 3 points but if you miss it's a turnover on downs.
    I wouldn't want to do that after a TD, but I have had another thought.

    The MISL (Major Indoor Soccer League) used to have a 2 point goal. If a goal was kicked from beyond midfield (30 yds indoors) and it went in without anyone on the kicking team touching it, it was worth 2 points.

    So, how about a 4 point field goal? If the line of scrimmage is the 40 or farther, which would make it at least a 58 yd FG, it would be worth 4 pts instead of 3. This would be rare except at the very end of a half because they odds of making it are slim and you would give your opponent really good field position if you missed, but the extra point might induce some teams to go for it in certain situations.

    The NFL record is 63 yds, but the college record is 69 yds and the high school record is 68 yds. (Check out this impressive list.) There are plenty of guys who can kick it that distance. Accuracy is another story.

    It's just something that I think would add another fun wrinkle to the game.
    ***Official Chiefs Crowd Game Thread Starter***

    This space is reserved for something that has nothing whatsoever to do with MatthewsChiefs. (Whoever THAT is!)

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,128

    Default

    this would be an absoulute dumb idea.no offense against the author at all .but for gawd sakes what ever happend to if it is not broke dont fix it .the nfl is perfectly fine as is now.even better a few years ago before they tried tweaking a rule here and there.LEAVE IT ALONE

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    graham gano has kicked 67,65, & 64 yd fgs in high school in 2004...wonder what ever happened to him???
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    graham gano has kicked 67,65, & 64 yd fgs in high school in 2004...wonder what ever happened to him???
    He plays for the redskins

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Chiefs are planning to retain Romeo Crennel and remove interimtag
    By hayden2004 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01-11-2012, 12:07 AM
  2. Extra MNF Ticket
    By Vanilla Garilla in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-28-2011, 12:41 AM
  3. Extra game?
    By tornadospotter in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 09:41 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-02-2008, 03:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •