Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: mayock #11 pick mark barron 2 chiefs

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,128

    Default mayock #11 pick mark barron 2 chiefs

    mike mayocks official mock draft has us taking mark barron.who knows that would be the best safety group in the league

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    barron is talented nd a hard hitter but is oft injured...has already had 2 shoulder,2 hernia and knee surgeries. to high to risk it, rather kuechly or decastro both very durable so far
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rodu View Post
    There are bigger needs
    You're kidding right? We have Lilja as our LG, we don't need an ILB people are just wanting one. We run a LOT of 3 safety sets. McGraw, Sabby and heck even Donald Washinton spent a ton of time out on the field last year. That was with Lewis out there...how is it again that safety isn't a need?

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OPLookn View Post
    You're kidding right? We have Lilja as our LG, we don't need an ILB people are just wanting one. We run a LOT of 3 safety sets. McGraw, Sabby and heck even Donald Washinton spent a ton of time out on the field last year. That was with Lewis out there...how is it again that safety isn't a need?

    safety is a need but not barron at 11
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    safety is a need but not barron at 11
    I remember the same thing being said about another guy at 5 a few years ago.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OPLookn View Post
    You're kidding right? We have Lilja as our LG, we don't need an ILB people are just wanting one. We run a LOT of 3 safety sets. McGraw, Sabby and heck even Donald Washinton spent a ton of time out on the field last year. That was with Lewis out there...how is it again that safety isn't a need?
    Because we has a very strong secondary in 2011 and that with all those other names getting more playing time filling in for Berry for the entire year.

    Those players you named will all drop back one spot on the depth chart when Berry returns.

    And Lilja is unable to move the LOS, which is job-1 in a run-heavy offense.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    May 2009
    Posts
    11

    Default

    I feel the same way about DeCastro and Barron. You wouldn't hear me complain whatsoever if we picked one of them but there is too much depth later in this draft to justify picking them. Top to bottom, there are 8 safeties in this draft that would be good value picks and probably 5 high quality guards in rounds 2-4. With the importance of 3-4 DE's in our defensive scheme, contract questions regarding our current starters, and the infamous DE learning curve, I think we still see a DE Round 1. Premier 3-4 DE's are rare - there are only 4 I would really consider worthwhile in this draft (Fletcher Cox will probably be gone before 11).

    Michael Brockers - Middle Round 1
    Devon Still - End Round 1
    Kendall Reyes - Beginning Round 2
    Derek Wolfe - Maybe Middle to Late Round 2

    And I have doubts about whether or not Derek Wolfe would 2-gap. Basically 3 choices and all likely to be gone by our second pick.

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    Speaking of who we're going to select is the chat room going to be open for the draft? It was last year and it was fun going back and forth with everyone. Although I didn't like the early birds that announced who the pick was before it got to the podium. I guess this year they're not going to show the person when they're talking to the team that selected them. Keep the secrecy until the pick is announced...at the podium.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    S.J. Cali
    Posts
    883

    Default

    I am wondering the same thing..(chat room today?) My DVR is set I like to watch the highlights of picks. It really speeds up the watching process.
    The only Racing Team that matters-HENDRICK MotorSports. 24\48\88\5.. I need another! :please: :
    I'm out..

    1 Free "Get Out Of Mancard Violation" earned by braving The Black Hole as The Chiefs redeemed themselves.

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OPLookn View Post
    I remember the same thing being said about another guy at 5 a few years ago.

    i don't remember anyone ? Berrys' ability or durability...just that we had some greater needs which i am sure may be debatably still true. Berry has lived up to his hype however their are some that would still argue we should have used that pick to fill a more glaring need.
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    barron is talented nd a hard hitter but is oft injured...has already had 2 shoulder,2 hernia and knee surgeries. to high to risk it, rather kuechly or decastro both very durable so far
    yeah he is so injury prone that mayock and kiper are calling him one of the safest picks in the draft. and the cowboys,chargers and patriots are all trying to trade up for him because they want to waist there pick. bottomline the gm's and pros know more than us and everyone is big on this kid

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Chiefs workout Ex-Packers RT Mark Tauscher Today
    By Big Daddy Tek in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-02-2009, 10:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •